SavedAdd your journal

Journals / MN Kardiyoloji / 2000 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

The significance of electrophysiologic studies in symptomatic left bundle branch block

Semptomatik sol dal blokunda elektrofizyolojik çalışmanın önemi

Oben DÖVEN
Muharrem GÜLDAL
Remzi KARAOĞUZ
Tamer SAYIN
Derviş ORAL
Pages
62–63
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Holler monitoring demonstrated complete heart block at this time and permanent pacemaker was implanted to the patient.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Syncope and near-syncope in patients with left bundle branch block is common clinical problem.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We report the case, 80 years old man, with syncope attacks and left bundle branch block.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Holler monitoring demonstrated complete heart block at this time and permanent pacemaker was implanted to the patient.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kalp bloğu · Dal bloğu · Atrioventriküler nod

Abstract

Syncope and near-syncope in patients with left bundle branch block is common clinical problem. These symptoms may be due to intermittent complete heart block. We report the case, 80 years old man, with syncope attacks and left bundle branch block. No underlying cause was found in the first evaluation. According to the findings of electrophysiologic testing, second 24-hours Holler monitoring was done. Holler monitoring demonstrated complete heart block at this time and permanent pacemaker was implanted to the patient.

Özet

Senkop ve presenkop atakları dal bloku olan hastalarda sık görülmektedir. Gözlenen bu semptomlar atriyoventriküler tam bloklara bağlı olabilir. Olgumuz olan 80 yaşındaki, sol dal bloklu erkek hastada, senkop ataklarının nedeni ilk araştırmada bulunamazken (elektrofizyolojik çalışma doğrultusunda yapılan 24 saatlik Holter tekrarlarında geçici atriyoventriküler tam blok saptandı ve hastaya kalıcı pacemaker takıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

DÖVEN, O., GÜLDAL, M., KARAOĞUZ, R., SAYIN, T., ORAL, D. (2000). The significance of electrophysiologic studies in symptomatic left bundle branch block. MN Kardiyoloji, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 62–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/297840

References (1)

  1. McAnulty JH, Rahimtoola SH, Murphy ES, Kaufman S, Ritzmann LW, et al. Natural history of high risk bundle branch block: final report of prospective study. N Engl J Med 1982;307:137. Dhingra RC, Palileo E, Strasberg B, Swiryn S, Bauernfeind RA, et al. Significance of HV interval in 517 patients with chronic bifasicular block, circulation 1977; 56:240. Scheinman MM, Peters RW, Morady F, Sauve MJ, Malone P, et al. Electrophysiologic studies in patients with bundle branch block. PACE 1983;6:1157. Scheinman MM, Peters RW, Modin G, Mies C, O' Young J. Prognostic value of infranodal conduction time in patients with chronic bundle branch block. Circulation 1977;56:240. Ezri M, Lerman BB, Marchlinski FE, Buxton AE, Josephon ME, et al. Electrophysiologic evaluation of syncope in patients with bifasicular block. Am Heart J 1983; 106:693. Click RL, Gersh BJ, Surgue DD, Holmes DR, Wood DL, et al. Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic Bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol 1987;59:817.