Journals / MN Kardiyoloji / 2003 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

A new definition in the patent foramen ovale

Patent foramen ovalenin yeniden tanımlanması

Pages
104–110
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, for avoiding possible limitations it may be helpful to focus on the junction between the septum primum and secundum to interrogate for the presence of PFO.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to identify the prevalence of PFO, which definition based on the detection of the seperation between septum primum and secundum by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and to seek the relationship between atrial functions and contrast passage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:TEE were performed with a Hewlett-Packard (Sonos 1500) 5 MHz multiplane transducer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, for avoiding possible limitations it may be helpful to focus on the junction between the septum primum and secundum to interrogate for the presence of PFO.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tanı teknikleri · kalp damar · Kalp septal defektleri

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to identify the prevalence of PFO, which definition based on the detection of the seperation between septum primum and secundum by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and to seek the relationship between atrial functions and contrast passage. Material and Methods: Two hundred two consecutive patients referred for TEE were studied. TEE were performed with a Hewlett-Packard (Sonos 1500) 5 MHz multiplane transducer. The transducer was positioned to give a clear view of the thinnest portion of the interatrial septum and the junction between the septum primum and secundum to interrogate for the presence of PFO. Differentiating septum primum and secundum and visualising the tunnel, which is formed by these two septums, was the main criteria to define PFO. Results: The patients with no contrast passage had greater heart rate (91±15 vs. 79±14 beat/min, p=0.002), left ventricular diastolic diameter (3.54±0.82 vs 3.1±0.62, p=0.02) and rate of atrial fibrillation (%55 vs.%30, p=0.034) while left ventricular ejection fractıon was lower (.56.±12 vs 64±8, p=0.004.) than those with contrast passage. Besides, left atrial diameter (4.96±0.85 vs. 3.95.±0.69, p<0.001), area (27±8.3 vs.18.4±6.4, p<0.001) and spontaneous echo contrast degree were also greater (1.61±1.37 vs. 0.38±0.81, p<0.001) while left atrial appendage ejection rate was lower in patients with no contrast passage. (42±23 vs. 68±24, p<0.001). Conclusion: It is likely that a deterioration in left atrial function may prevent the contrast passage from right to left. Therefore, for avoiding possible limitations it may be helpful to focus on the junction between the septum primum and secundum to interrogate for the presence of PFO.

Özet

Amaç: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) tanısı koyarken mevcut kısıtlamalardan etkilenmemek için TEE ile septum primum ve sekundum ayrışmasınının görülmesini esas alarak, PFO sıklığını ve PFO varlığında kontrast geçişi ile her iki atriyum fonksiyonu arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmak için bu çalışmayı planladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya değişik endikasyonlar sebebiyle TEE incelemesi istenen arka arkaya 202 hasta dahil edildi. Bütün incelemeler Hewlett-Packard Sonos 1500 ekokardiyografi cihazına takılan multiplane 5 MHz TEE probu yardımıyla gerçekleştirildi. Septumun en ince yerini lokalize etmek ve PFO tanısı için septum primum ile sekundumun birleşme yerini en iyi görmek için gerekli olan kesit bulundu. Septum primum ve sekundumun ayırt edilebilmesi ve atriyumların her iki septumun oluşturduğu tünelle birbiri ile bağlantısının saptanması PFO tanısı için esas alındı. Bulgular: Sol atriyuma kontrast geçişi görülmeyen grupta kalp hızı (91±15 karşı 79±14 atım/dak, p=0.002), sol ventrikül sistolik çapı (3.54±0.82 karşı 3.1±0.62, p=0.02) ve atriyal fibrilasyon görülme sıklığı kontrast geçişi saptanan gruba göre daha fazla iken (%55 karşı %30, p=0.034) sol ventrikül ejeksiyon fraksiyonu düşüktü (56±12 karşı 64±8, p=0.004) (Tablo 1). Kontrast geçişi görülmeyen grupta sol atriyum çapı (4.96±0.85 karşı 3.95.±0.69, p<0.001), alanı (27±8.3 karşı18.4±6.4, p<0.001) ve spontan eko kontrast derecesi daha fazla iken (1.61±1.37 karşı 0.38±0.81, p<0.001) sol atriyum apendiks boşalma hızı daha düşüktü (42±23 karşı 68±24, p<0.001). Sonuç: PFO da sol atriyuma kontrast geçişini esas olarak sol atriyum fonksiyonu belirler. Bu yüzden PFO tanısı için sol atriyuma kontrast geçişinden ziyade septum sekundum ve primum ayrışmasını almak daha uygun olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖRGÜLÜ, Ş., EREN, M., ÇELİK, S., YILDIRIM, A., USLU, N., DAĞDEVİREN, B., GÜROL, T., UZUNLAR, B., NURKALEM, Z., TEZEL, T. (2003). A new definition in the patent foramen ovale. MN Kardiyoloji, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 104–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/297811

References (8)

  1. Lechat P, Mas JL, Lascault G, et. al. Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in patients with stroke. ISI Engl J Med 1988; 318:1148-52. de Belder MA, TourikisL, Leech G, Camm AJ. Risk of patent foramen ovale for thromboembolic events in all age groups. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69:1316-20.
  2. Van Camp G, Schulze D, Cosyns B, Vandenbossche jL. Relation between patent foramen ovale and stroke. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71:596-8. Cartoni 0, De Castro S, Valente G, et al. Idendification of scuba divers with patent foramen ovale at risk for decompres sion sickness. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31(suppl A):515A. Young ML, Smith DS, Murtagh F, Vasquez A, Levitt J Comparison of surgical and anesthetic complications in neurosurgical patients experiencing venous air embolism in the sitting position. Neurosurgery 1986; 18:157-61.
  3. Mammoto T, Hayashi Y, Ohnishi Y, Kuro M. Incidence of venous and paradoxical air embolism in neurosurgical patients in the sitting position: Detection by transesophageal echocardio graphy. ACTA Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42:643-7.
  4. De Belder MA, Tourikis L, Griffith M. Transesophageal contrast echocardiography and color flow mapping: methods of choice for the dedection of shunts at the atrial level? Am Heart J 1992;124:1545-50.
  5. Sun JP, Steward WJ, Hanna J, Thomas JD. Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale by contrast versus color Doppler by transesophageal echocardiography: realation to atrial size. Am Heart J 1996; 131:239-44.
  6. Van Camp G, Franken P, Melis P, Cosyns B, Schoors D, Vanoverschelde JL. Comparison of transthoracic echocardio­ graphy with second harmonic imaging with transesophageal echocardiography in the detection of right to left shunts. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86:1284-7, A9. Siostrzonek P, Zangeneh M, Gössinger H, et al. Comparison of transesophageal and transthoracic contrast echocardiograpy for detection of a patent foramen ovale. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68:1247-9.
  7. De Castro S, Cartoni D, Fiorelli M, et al. Patent foramen ovale and its embolic implications. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86(suppl):51G-2G. Stoddard MF, Keedy DL, Dawkins PR. The cough test is superior to the Valsalva maneuver in the delineation of right to left shunting through a patent foramen ovale during contrast transesophageal echocardiography. Am Heart J 1993; 125:185. Kerr AJ, Chia KKM, Buck Thomas, et al. Bed tilt as an effort independent maneuver to improve patent foramen ovale assesment by transthoracic contrast echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88:94-8.
  8. Movsowitz HD, Movsowitz C, Jacops LE, Kotler MN.