Journals / MN Kardiyoloji / 2002 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

The evaluation of myocardial blood flow with measurement technique to Fractional Flow Reserve in patients with myocardial bridging

Miyokardiayal "Bridging" olgularında "Fractional Flow Reserve" ölçüm tekniği ile miyokardiyal kan akımının değerlendirilmesi

Pages
260–263
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: Fractional flow reserve is not a useful index to evaluate the influence of MB in myocardial blood flow and is insufficient to demonstrate ischemia in patients with myocardial bridging.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an index to determine the functional severity of myocardial ischemia in coronary stenosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty and eight male patients with myocardial bridging (MB) who had systolic narrowing $\geq$70% in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) were enrolled in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: Fractional flow reserve is not a useful index to evaluate the influence of MB in myocardial blood flow and is insufficient to demonstrate ischemia in patients with myocardial bridging.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Geriyedönük çalışma · Kan basıncı · Hastalık ciddiyet indeksi

Abstract

AIM: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an index to determine the functional severity of myocardial ischemia in coronary stenosis. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of this index for establishing the severity of ischemia due to myocardial systolic narrowing in patients with myocardial bridging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty and eight male patients with myocardial bridging (MB) who had systolic narrowing $\geq$70% in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) were enrolled in this study. Thallium 201 sintigraphy testing (TST) was performed in all patients. Myocardial fractional flow reserve was measured with an intracoronary guidewire-mounted pressure wire. A FFR value <0.75 was distinguished functionally significant stenosis (positive). According to the presence of perfusion disturbance in TST, the patients (mean age: 54±7 years) were divided into two groups (I: TST positive, II: TST negative) and sub-groups according to the value of FFR index (A: FFR positive, B: FFR negative). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between all groups related to the degree of mean systolic narrowing in LAD (p=0.6). The value of FFR has shown significant myocardial ischemia in 56% of patients in group I who had positive thallium testing. The FFR value was >0.75 (negative) in 67% of patients in group II who had negative TST. There was not found any statistical difference between FFR indexes in sub-groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Fractional flow reserve is not a useful index to evaluate the influence of MB in myocardial blood flow and is insufficient to demonstrate ischemia in patients with myocardial bridging.

Özet

AMAÇ: Fraksiyonel akım rezervi (Fractional Flow Reserve=FFR), koroner arter darlıklarında miyokardiyal iskeminin fonksiyonel olarak ciddiyetini belirlemede kullanılan bir indekstir. Bu çalışmada Miyokardiyal "bridge" (MB) olan olgularda miyokardiyal sistolik daralmanın sebep olabileceği iskeminin ciddiyetini belirlemede FFR indeksinin kullanılabilirliği araştırılmıştır. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEMLER: Çalışmaya sol ön inen koroner arterde (LAD) sistolik daralmanın $\geq$%70 olan 38 MB'li erkek hasta alındı. Tüm hastalara talyum 201 sintigrafi testi (TST) uygulandı. Miyokardiyal fraksiyonel akım rezervi basınç algılayıcı transdüseri olan bir intrakoroner klavuz tel ile ölçüldü. FFR 0.75 (negatif) idi. Alt gruplar arasında FFR indeksi açısından istatistiksel anlamlı fark saptanmadı (p>0.05). SONUÇ: Fraksiyonel akım rezervi, MB'nin miyokardiyal kan akımı üzerindeki etkisini incelemek için kullanışlı bir indeks değildir ve miyokardial "bridging" olgularında iskemiyi göstermede yetersiz kalmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZOGHİ, M., YAVUZGİL, O., GÜRGÜN, C., AKILLI, A. (2002). The evaluation of myocardial blood flow with measurement technique to Fractional Flow Reserve in patients with myocardial bridging. MN Kardiyoloji, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 260–263. https://ajindex.com/articles/297801

References (13)

  1. Braunwald E: Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 6th Ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders 2001:415-6.
  2. Portsmann W, Iwig J: Die intramurale koronaroerterie im angiogramm. Fortschr Roentenstr 1960; 92:129-30.
  3. Angelini P, Trivellata M, Denis J et al: myocardial bridges. A review. Prog Cardiovasc Disease 1983; 1:75-88.
  4. Kramer JR, Kitazume H, Proufit WL, et al. Clinical significance of isolated coronary bridges: Benign and frequent condition involving the left anterior descending artery. Am Heart J 1982; 103:282-8. Assey ME. The puzzle of normal coronary arteries in the patient with chest pain: What to do? Clin Cardiol 1993; 16:170-80.
  5. Bshour TT, Espinoza E, Blumenthal J, et al. Myocardial infarction caused by coronary artery myocardial bridge. Am Heart J 1997; 124:473-7.
  6. Cottin Y, Lauren G. Letters to editor: Acute myocardial infarction related to myocardial bridging. Eur Heart J 1995; 16:2002-3.
  7. Ramos SG, Montenegre AP, Felik PR, et al. Occlusive thrombosis in myocardial bridgeing. Am Heart J 1993; 125:17713. Kranidis AJ, Salachas AJ, Antonellis IP, et al. Transesophageal echocardiographic Doppler study of coronary flow in a patient with myocardial bridging--a case report. Angiology 1997; 48:1007-11.
  8. Kütük E, Korkmaz Ş, Duru E ve ark. Semptomatik miyokardiyal bridge, ergometrik efor testi, egzersiz thallium-201 perfüzyon sintigrafisi ve koroner anjiografi korelasyonu. Mavi Bülten 1986; 18:159-77.
  9. Noble J, Bourassa MG, Petitclere R, Dyrda I. Myocardial bridging and milking effect of left anterior descending coronary artery: Normal variant or obstruction. Am J Cardiol 1967; 37: 993-9.
  10. Clara EE, Hanekamp MD, Jacques J, et al. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment. Circulation,, 1999; 99:1015-21.
  11. Takeuchi M, Himeno E, Sonoda Sh, Nakashima Y, Kuroiwa A. Measurement of myocardial fractional flow reserve during coronary angioplasty in patients with old myocardial infarction. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997; 42:19-25.
  12. Segers P, Fostier G, Neckerbrock J, Vandonck P. Assessing coronary artery stenosis severity: In vitro validation of the concept of factional flow reserve. Gathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1999; 46:375-9.
  13. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Been GJ, et al. Coronary pressure measurement to assess the hemodynamic significance of serial stenoses within one coronary artery: validation in humans. Circulation 2000; 102:2371 -7. Bech GJ, Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, et al. U