Journals / MN Kardiyoloji / 2014 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Outcomes of primary angioplasty procedure of a tertiary center without on-site cardiac surgery

Kalp damar cerrahisi olmayan tersiyer bir merkezin primer anjiyoplasti sonuçları

Pages
140–144
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Our primary angioplasty results were comparable with on- site cardiac surgery hospitals.These results support the theory that primary angioplasty can be effective and safe at off- site cardiac surgery hospitals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Debates continue about primary angioplasty procedures at hospitals without on- site cardiac surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Forty five consecutive acute ST- elevation myocardial infarction patients were underwent primary angioplasty between January and May 2012 at our hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Our primary angioplasty results were comparable with on- site cardiac surgery hospitals.These results support the theory that primary angioplasty can be effective and safe at off- site cardiac surgery hospitals.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Debates continue about primary angioplasty procedures at hospitals without on- site cardiac surgery. We aimed to present and compare the results of primary angioplasty procedures performed at our center without on- site cardiac surgery with the literature. Material and Method: Forty five consecutive acute ST- elevation myocardial infarction patients were underwent primary angioplasty between January and May 2012 at our hospital. Results: Mean age was 62±7 years (40- 85), 34 (76%) were male and, 11 (24%) were female. Thirteen (29%) patients were acute an- terior myocardial infarction and 32 (71%) were acute inferior myocardial infarction. Door- to- balloon time was 38±19 minutes. Thrombosis aspiration was 11% and intra-aortic pump use was 6%. Procedure success rate was 93%. In- hospital mortality was 4. 4%, vascular access complications were 2. 2%. A stent was slipped off from the balloon in one patient but retrieved from the artery and primary percutaneous procedure was completed successfully. There was no stroke and emergent cardiac surgery were not needed in any patient. Conclusion: Our primary angioplasty results were comparable with on- site cardiac surgery hospitals.These results support the theory that primary angioplasty can be effective and safe at off- site cardiac surgery hospitals.

Özet

Amaç: Kalp- damar cerrahisi olmayan hastanelerde primer anjiyoplastinin yapılabilirliği hakkındaki tartışmalar devam etmektedir. Bu çalışmada, kalp damar cerrahisi olmayan tersiyer merkezimizdeki primer anjiyoplasti sonuçlarını sunmayı ve literatürle karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Hastanemizde Ocak- Mayıs 2012 tarihleri arasında primer anjiyoplasti yapılan 45 ardışık akut ST- segment yükselmeli miyokard enfarktüsü (STEMI) olgusu çalışmaya alındı. Bulgular: Hastaların 34’ü (%76) erkek, 11’i (%24) kadın, ortalama yaşı 62±7 (40-85) idi. Akut anteriyor miyokard enfaktüsü (MI) 13 (%29), akut inferiyor MI 32 (%71) adetti. Kapı- balon zamanı 38±19 dakika, trombus aspirasyon oranı %11 ve %6 intra- aortik balon pompası kullanıldı. İşlem başarı oranı %93, hastane içi ölüm %4,4, damar- girişim yeri komplikasyonları %2,2 idi. Bir hastada stentin balondan sıyrılması oldu, bu hastada stent damardan başarılı olarak geri çıkarıldı ve primer anjiyoplasti işlemi tamamlandı. İnme ya da acil kardiyovasküler cerrahi gereksinimi olmadı. Sonuç: Hastanemizde kalp damar cerrahi desteği olmadan gerçekleştirilen primer anjiyoplasti sonuçlarımız literatürdeki kalp- damar cerrahisi olan merkezlerin sonuçları ile benzer bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlar, kalp damar cerrahisi olmayan merkezlerde primer anjiyoplasti yapılmasının güvenilir ve etkili olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MANSUROĞLU, C., ÖRNEK, E., ÇETİN, M., KIZILTUNÇ, E., KUNDİ, H., BALUN, A., GÖK, M., HÜSEYNOVA, S., UĞURLU, B., ULUSOY, F. V. (2014). Outcomes of primary angioplasty procedure of a tertiary center without on-site cardiac surgery. MN Kardiyoloji, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 140–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/297320

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Keely EC, Boura JA, Grines C L.Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantative rewiev of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003;361:13-20
  2. Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, et al. Comparison of pri- mary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: A quantative review: JAMA 1997;278:2093-8
  3. Seshardi N, Whitlow PL, Acharya N, Blackstone EH, Ellis SG. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era. Circulation 2002;106:2346-50
  4. Yang EH, Gumina RJ, Lennon RJ, Holmes DR Jr., Rihal CS, Singh M. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery for percutaneous interventions: changes in the incidence, clinical characteristics, and indications from 1979 to 2003. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:2004-9
  5. Wharton TP Jr., McNamara NS, Fedele FA, Jacobs MI, Gladstone AR, Funk EJ. Primary angioplasty for the treat- ment of acute myocardial infarction: experience at two community hospitals without cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;3:1257-65
  6. Warthon TP Jr., Grines LL, Turco MA, et al. Primary Angi- oplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction at Hospitals With No Surgery On-Site (the PAMI- No SOS Study) versus transfer to surgical centers for primary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004:43:1943-50
  7. Ozhan AR, Yazıcı EE, Albayrak S, Gunduz H, Uyan C. Pri- mary angioplasty without on-site surgical back-up: The first experience with mobile catheterization facility. J Invas Cardiol 2004;16:645-8
  8. Angeja BG, Gibson CM, Chin R, et al. Predictors of door- to-balloon delay in primary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:1156-61
  9. Cannon CP, Gibson CM, Lanbrew CT, et al. Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time with mortality in pa- tients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infac- tion. JAMA 2000;283:2941-7
  10. Barron HV, Bowlby LJ, Breen T, et al. Use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the United States: Data from the National Registry of Myocardial Iinfarction 2. Circulation 1998;97:1150-6
  11. Rogers WJ, Canto JG, Lambrew CT; et al. Temporal trends in the teatment over 1. 5 million patients with myocar- dial infarction in the u.s. from 1990 through 1999. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:2056-63
  12. Weaver WD. All hospitals are not equal for treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2003;108:1768-71
  13. Angeja BG, Gibson CM, Chin R, et al. Predictors of door- to-balloon delay