Journals / MN Kardiyoloji / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

A Rare Case of Lead Revision with Subclavian Vein Stenosis: Transport Lead from Opposite Side to Generator

Kalıcı Kalp Pili İmplante Edilen ve Elektrot Revizyonu Gereken Subklavyen Ven Stenozu Gelişmiş Nadir Bir Olgu: Lead’in Ters Taraftan Jeneratöre Taşınması

Pages
146–148
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We present a case of lead revision by transport right ventricle lead right to left pectoral area in a pa- tient with left subclavian venous stenosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pacemaker implantation has increased steadily in recent years and this also caused an increase number of new procedures like lead re- vision.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Usually 3 leads use for cardiac resynchronisation therapy implantation and this increases the venous stenosis risk.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We present a case of lead revision by transport right ventricle lead right to left pectoral area in a pa- tient with left subclavian venous stenosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Pacemaker implantation has increased steadily in recent years and this also caused an increase number of new procedures like lead re- vision. While lead revision, venous occlusion due to the old procedure is one of the most important problems. The most important risk factor for venous stenosis is the number of used leads. Usually 3 leads use for cardiac resynchronisation therapy implantation and this increases the venous stenosis risk. We present a case of lead revision by transport right ventricle lead right to left pectoral area in a pa- tient with left subclavian venous stenosis.

Özet

Pil implantasyonu son yıllarda sürekli artış göstermektedir ve bu durum lead revizyonu gibi yeni işlem sayısını da artırmaktadır. Lead re- vizyonu yaparken daha önce yapılan işleme bağlı venöz tıkanıklık önemli bir problemdir. Venöz tıkanıklık için en önemli risk faktörü kulla- nılan lead sayısıdır. Kardiyak resenkronizasyon tedavisi için sıklıkla 3 lead kullanılmakta ve bu durum venöz tıkanıklık riskini artırmaktadır. Sol subklavyen ven tıkanıklığı olan bir hastada sağ ventrikül leadinin sağ pektoral bölgeden sol pektoral bölgeye taşındığı bir vaka sunu- mu hazırladık.

🔖

Cite This Article

UÇAR, F. M., YILMAZTEPE, M. A. (2018). A Rare Case of Lead Revision with Subclavian Vein Stenosis: Transport Lead from Opposite Side to Generator. MN Kardiyoloji, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 146–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/297244

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Lickfett L. Bitzen A. Arepally A. et al. Incidence of venous obstruction following insertion of an implantable car- dioverter defibrillator. A study of systematic contrast venography on patients presenting for their first elective ICD generator replacement. Europace 2004;6:25-31 Sticherling C. Chough SP. Baker RL. et al. Prevalence of cen- tral venous occlusion in patients with chronic defibrillator leads. Am Heart J 2001;141:813-6 Abu-El-Haija B. Bhave PD. Campbell DN. et al. Venous Ste - no sis After Transvenous Lead Placement: A Study of Out - comes and Risk Factors in 212 Consecutive Patients. J Am Heart Assoc 2015;4(8):e001878. doi: 10.1161/ JAHA. 115.001878 Tourret J. et al. Central venous stenosis as a complication of ipsilateral haemodialysis fistula and pacemaker. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20(5):997-1001