Journals / MN Kardiyoloji / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Monocyte-to-High Density Lipoprotein Ratio in Patients with Cardiac Syndrome X

Kardiyak Sendrom X’li Hastalarda Monosit Yüksek Dansiteli Lipoprotein Oranının Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
65–69
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to these results, monocyte-to- high-density lipoprotein ratio may not be helpful in diagnosing cardiac syndrome X.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Although the relationship between atherosclerosis-inflammation is clearly known, the relationship between cardiac syn- drome X inflammation has not been clearly determined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: In a retrospective study, a total of 155 subjects (81 patients with cardiac syndrome X, 74 control) were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to these results, monocyte-to- high-density lipoprotein ratio may not be helpful in diagnosing cardiac syndrome X.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Although the relationship between atherosclerosis-inflammation is clearly known, the relationship between cardiac syn- drome X inflammation has not been clearly determined. Monocyte high-density lipoprotein ratio is a marker of inflammation. The aim of the study is to investigate the association between cardiac syndrome X and monocyte-to- high-density lipoprotein ratio. Material and Method: In a retrospective study, a total of 155 subjects (81 patients with cardiac syndrome X, 74 control) were examined. Monocyte-to- high-density lipoprotein ratio was calculated and compared in patients with cardiac syndrome X and control group. Then Duke treadmill scores of patients with cardiac syndrome X were calculated. It was investigated whether there was a correlation between monocyte-to- high-density lipoprotein ratio and Duke treadmill scores. Results: There was not a statistically significant between the groups in terms of monocyte-to- high-density lipoprotein ratio (6.2±2.72 vs. 6.27±3.49, p=0.879). Similarly there was not a statistically significant correlation between Duke treadmill score and monocyte-to- high-density lipoprotein ratio (r=0,049, p=0,667). Conclusion: Monocyte-to- high-density lipoprotein ratio value was not elevated in patients with cardiac syndrome X compared to the control group. In addition, this value was not statistically correlated with Duke treadmill score. According to these results, monocyte-to- high-density lipoprotein ratio may not be helpful in diagnosing cardiac syndrome X.

Özet

Amaç: Enflamasyonun aterosklerozdaki rolü çok iyi bilinmesine rağmen kardiyak sendrom X’deki rolü net değildir. Monosit-yüksek dan- siteli lipoprotein oranı enflamasyonu gösteren önemli bir belirteçtir. Son yıllarda yapılan çalışmalarda monosit yüksek dansiteli lipopro- tein oranının birçok kardiyak istenmeyen olay ile ilişkili olduğu gösterilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı kardiyak sendrom X tanısında mono- sit yüksek dansiteli lipoprotein oranının yerinin olup olmadığını araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma geriye dönük olarak planlandı. Kardiyak sendrom X tanısı konulmuş 81 hasta (54 kadın, 27 erkek) ve normal koroner bilgisayarlı tomografileri olan 74 sağlıklı gönüllünün (49 kadın, 25 erkek) monosit yüksek dansiteli lipoprotein oranları karşılaş- tırıldı. Ek olarak kardiyak sendrom X’li hastaların Duke treadmill skorları hesaplandı ve monosit yüksek dansiteli lipoprotein oranı ile ara- sında korelasyon olup olmadığı değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Monosit yüksek dansiteli lipoprotein oranı kardiyak sendrom X’li hastalarda 6,2±2,72 kontrol grubunda ise 6,27±3,49 olarak bulundu. İki grup arasında istatistiksel anlamlı fark olmadığı görüldü (p=0,879). Yapılan korelasyon analizinde ise hasta grubunun Duke treadmill skoru ile monosit yüksek dansiteli lipoprotein oranı arasında istatistiksel anlamlı korelasyon olmadığı görüldü (r=0,049, p=0,667). Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sonuçlarına göre kardiyak sendrom X’li hastalarda monosit yüksek dansiteli lipoprotein oranı sağlıklı popülasyon ile karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel anlamlı olarak yüksek değildi, ek olarak Duke treadmill skoru ile monosit yüksek dansiteli lipoprotein oranı arasında anlamlı korelasyon bulunamadı. Bu sonuçlara göre monosit yüksek dansiteli lipoprotein oranı kardiyak sendrom X’in ta- nısında yardımcı olmayabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, M., BİLGEL, Z. G., ALTIN, C., CANDEMİR, B., ACIBUCA, A., OKAR, S., MÜDERRİSOĞLU, İ. H. (2018). Evaluation of Monocyte-to-High Density Lipoprotein Ratio in Patients with Cardiac Syndrome X. MN Kardiyoloji, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 65–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/297238

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Agrawal S, Mehta PK, Bairey Merz CN. Cardiac Syndrome X: update 2014. Cardiol Clin 2014;32:463-78. Microvascular Resistance in Patients with Cardiac Synd ro - me X. Arq Bras Cardiol 2017;109:397-403.
  2. Chen C, Wei J, AlBadri A, Zarrini P, Bairey Merz CN. Coro - nary Microvascular Dysfunction-Epidemiology, Patho ge - nesis, Prognosis, Diagnosis, Risk Factors and Therapy. Circ J 2016;81:3-11.
  3. Synetos A, Papaioannou S, Tousoulis D. Atherosclerosis and inflammation. Clinical aspects of a modern tale. Hellenic J Cardiol 2017;58:122-3.
  4. Gratchev A, Sobenin I, Orekhov A, Kzhyshkowska J. Mono - cytes as a diagnostic marker of cardiovascular diseases. Immunobiology 2012;217:476-82.
  5. Nozawa N, Hibi K, Endo M, et al. Association between cir- culating monocytes and coronary plaque progression in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circ J 2010; 74:1384-91.
  6. Çiçek G, Kundi H, Bozbay M, Yayla C, Uyarel H. The rela- tionship between admission monocyte HDL-C ratio with short-term and long-term mortality among STEMI patients treated with successful primary PCI. Coronary Artery Dis 2016;27:176-84.
  7. Myers J, Arena R, Franklin B, et al. American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism, and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Recommen - dations for clinical exercise laboratories: a scientific state- ment from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2009;119:3144-61.
  8. Mark DB, Shaw L, Harrell FE Jr, et al. Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1991;325:849-53.
  9. Aziz A, Hansen HS, Sechtem U, Prescott E, Ong P. Sex- Related Differences in Vasomotor Function in Patients With Angina and Unobstructed Coronary Arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:2349-58.
  10. Long M, Huang Z, Zhuang X, et al. Association of Inflam - mation and Endothelial Dysfunction with Coronary Microvascular Resistance in Patients with Cardiac Synd ro - me X. Arq Bras Cardiol 2017;109:397-403.
  11. Demir B, Önal B, Özyazgan S, et al. Does Inflammation Have a Role in the Pathogenesis of Cardiac Syndrome X? A Genetic-Based Clinical Study With Assessment of Multiple Cytokine Levels. Angiology 2016;67:355-63.
  12. Okyay K, Yilmaz M, Yildirir A, et al. Relationship between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and impaired myocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015;19:1881-7.
  13. Çağdaş M, Karako