Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2009 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of bimanual microincision with standard coaxial phacoemulsification surgery in highly myopic eyes

Yüksek miyop gözlerde bimanuel mikroinsizyon ve standart koaksiyel fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
160–163
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since anterior chamber is more stable bimanual microincision cataract surgery can be performed with ease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of bimanual microincision phacoemulsification surgery with standard coaxial phacoemulsification surgery in highly myopic eyes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Sixteen eyes of 10 patients (Group-1) had bimanual microincision phacoemulsification surgery and 16 eyes of 14 patients (Group-2) had standard coaxial phacoemulsification surgery due to cataract or refractive correction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since anterior chamber is more stable bimanual microincision cataract surgery can be performed with ease.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of bimanual microincision phacoemulsification surgery with standard coaxial phacoemulsification surgery in highly myopic eyes. Material and Method: Sixteen eyes of 10 patients (Group-1) had bimanual microincision phacoemulsification surgery and 16 eyes of 14 patients (Group-2) had standard coaxial phacoemulsification surgery due to cataract or refractive correction. The difficulties observed during surgery, complications, preoperative and postoperative best corrected visual acuities were recorded and compared. Follow up period was 1 month. Results: Mean age of the patients were 38,6±13,4 years (6 male - 4 female) in Group-1, and 39,1±12,0 years (9 male - 5 female) in Group-2. Mean preoperative visual acuities were 0.38±0.12 and 0,40±0,19 in Group-1 and Group-2 respectively. At the end of 1st month visual acuities improved to 0,62±0,11 and 0,84±0,17 in Group-1 and Group-2 respectively. Anterior chamber was stable throughout the surgery in Group-1, but sudden anterior chamber deeepening and surge was observed in 5 eyes in Group-2. No intraoperative complication was observed in either groups. Conclusion: Bimanual microincision cataract surgery is effective and safe as standard coaxial phacoemulsification surgery in highly myopic eyes. Since anterior chamber is more stable bimanual microincision cataract surgery can be performed with ease.

Özet

Amaç: Yüksek miyop gözlerde bimanuel mikroinsizyon fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi ile standart koaksiyel fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisinin etkinliği ve güvenirliğini karşılaştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntem: Katarakt nedeniyle veya refraktif cerrahi amaçlı fakoemülsifikasyon planlanan 10 hastanın 16 gözüne bimanuel mikroinsizyon fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi (Grup-1), 14 hastanın 16 gözüne ise standart koaksiyel fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi uygulandı (Grup-2). Cerrahi sırasında oluşan güçlükler, komplikasyonlar, ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası en iyi görme keskinlikleri kaydedilip değerlendirildi. Takip süresi 1 aydı. Bulgular: Birinci gruptaki hastaların ortalama yaşı 38,6±13,4 (6 Erkek - 4 Kadın) iken 2. grupta 39,1±12,0 (9 Erkek - 5 Kadın) idi. Ortalama preoperatif görme keskinlikleri Grup-1 ve Grup-2 de sırasıyla 0,38±0,12 ve 0,40±0,19 iken 1. ay sonunda 0,62±0,11 ve 0,84±0,17 idi. Grup-1 de cerrahi boyunca ön kamara stabil iken Grup-2 de 5 gözde ön kamarada ani derinleşme ve dalgalanmalar gözlendi. Her iki grupta da intra operatif komplikasyon gözlenmedi. Sonuç: Bimanuel mikroinsizyon katarakt cerrahisi yüksek miyop gözlerde standart fakoemülsifikasyon kadar etkin ve güvenlidir. Ön kamara stabilizasyonu daha iyi olduğundan cerrahi daha rahat bir şekilde uygulanabilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLKILIK, G., TAŞKAPILI, M., KOCABORA, S., FAZIL, K. (2009). Comparison of bimanual microincision with standard coaxial phacoemulsification surgery in highly myopic eyes. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 160–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/296816

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Packer M, Fine HI, Hoffman SR. Refractive Lens Surgery. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 2006; 19:77-88. 2.Shearing SP, Relyea RL, Louiza A, Shearing RL. Routine phacoemulsification through a one-millimeter non-sutured incision. Cataract 1985;2: 6-11. 3.Alio J, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Galal A, Ramzy C. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology 2005; 112:1997-2003 4.Alio JL. What does MICS require? In: Alio JL, Rodriguez Prats JL, Galal A, eds. MICS Micro-incision Cataract Surgery. Miami: Highlights of Ophthalmology; 2004:1- 4. 5.Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Agarwal S, et al. Phakonit: phacoemulsification through a 0.9 mm corneal incision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:1548-52. 6.Olson RJ. Clinical experience with 21-gauge manual mi-crophacoemulsification using Sovereign WhiteStar technology in eyes with dense cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:168-72. 7.Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Gabriel P, et al. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 2006; 113:1818-26. 8.Thomas R, Navin S, Parikh R. Learning micro insicion surgery without the learning curve. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56: 135-7. 9. Tsuneoka H, Shiba T, Takahashi Y. Feasibility of ultrasound cataract surgery with a 1.4 mm incision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27: 934-40. 10. Soscia W, Howard JG, Olson RJ. Microphacoemulsification with WhiteStar. A wound-temperature study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28: 1044-6.