Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2006 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

The comparison of 1.25% povidone lodine and 0.3% lomefloxacin for the treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis.

Akut bakteri konjonktiviti tedavisinde %0.3 lomefloksasin ve %1.25 povidon-iyodin’in etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
85–87
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Povidone-iodine 1.25% is effective as lomefloxacin 0.3% in the treatment of acute bac­terial conjunctivitis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To compare the efficacies of 1.25% povidone iodine and lomefloxacin (3 mg/ml) (Okacin 0.3%, Novaritis Ophthalmics) for the treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: There were 25 patients in the lomefloxacin group, and 23 patients in the povidone group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Povidone-iodine 1.25% is effective as lomefloxacin 0.3% in the treatment of acute bac­terial conjunctivitis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Konjunktivit · bakteriyel · Povidon-iyot

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacies of 1.25% povidone iodine and lomefloxacin (3 mg/ml) (Okacin 0.3%, Novaritis Ophthalmics) for the treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Material and Methods: Patients were diagnosed according to a predefined protocol, and they we­re randomized to receive povidon iodine or lomefloxacin. Results: There were 25 patients in the lomefloxacin group, and 23 patients in the povidone group. Both of the drugs were equally effective at eliminating the signs and symptoms at the first and second cont­rols (p>0.05 and p>0.05 respectively). Self-reported and the physician reported relief were equal among groups (p>0.05 and p>0.05 respectively). Conclusion: Povidone-iodine 1.25% is effective as lomefloxacin 0.3% in the treatment of acute bac­terial conjunctivitis.

Özet

Amaç: Akut bakteri konjonktiviti (ABK) tedavisinde %1.25 povidon iyodini lomefloksasin (Okacin %0.3, Novartis Ophthalmics) ile karşılaştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Hastaların klinik bulguları daha önceden belirlenmiş bir protokol ile de­re­ce­lendirildi. Hastalar, povidon-iyodin veya lomefloksasin almak üzere iki ayrı gruba ay­rıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların 25’i lomefloksasin 23’ü ise povidon grubunda idi. Her iki ilaç birinci ve i­kin­ci kontrollerde benzer düzeyde oküler bulgularda iyileşme meydana getirdi (p>0.05, p>0.05). Doktor ve has­talar tarafından bildirilen, daha iyi olma veya tam iyi olma oranı her iki grupta aynıydı (p>0.05, p>0.05). Sonuç: Povidon-iyodin %1.25 ABK tedavisinde lomefloksasin %0.3 kadar etkilidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPRAK, A. B., DEVECİ, H., BAŞER, E., ESER, E., GÜLER, C. (2006). The comparison of 1.25% povidone lodine and 0.3% lomefloxacin for the treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis.. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 85–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/296029

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Arffa RC. Grayson's Diseases of the Cornea. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Year Book Inc, 1991: 103-50. 2.Lohr, JA. Treatment of conjunctivitis in infants and children. Pediatr Ann 1991; 22:359-64. 3.Isenberg SJ, Apt L, Yoshimori R, Khwarg S. Chemical preparation of the eye in ophthalmic surgery IV: Comparison of povidone-iodine on the conjunctiva with a prophylactic antibiotic. Arch Ophthalmol 1985; 103:1340-2. 4.Isenberg SJ, Apt L, Wood M. A controlled trial of povidone-iodine as prophylaxis against ophthalmia neonatorum. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:562-6. 5.Isenberg, SJ, Apt L, Valenton M, Del Signore M, Cubillan L, Labrador MA, Chan P, Berman NG. A controlled trial of povidone-iodine to treat infectious conjunctivitis in children. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 134:681 -8. 6.l Jauch A, Fsadni M, Gamba G. Meta-analysis of six clinical phase III studies comparing lomefloxacin 0.3% eye drops twice daily to five standard antibiotics in patients with acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1999; 237:705-13, 7. Chalita MR, Höfling-üma AL, Paranhos A, Schor P, Belfort R. Shifting trends in in vitro antibiotic susceptibilities for common ocular isolates during a period of 15 years. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137:43-51. 8.Marangon FB, Miller D, Muallem MS, Romano AC, Alfonso EC. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin resistance among methicil-lin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus isolates from keratitis and conjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137:453-8. 9.Kaspar HM, Shriver EM, Nguyen EV, Egbert PR, Singh K, Blumenkranz MS, Ta CN. Risk factors for antibiotic-resistant conjunctival bacterial flora in patients undergoing intraocular surgery. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003; 241:730-3.