Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2006 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

Modified VF-14 test application and patient satisfaction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation

Multifokal göz içi lens implantasyonunda modifiye Vf-14 testi uygulamaları ve hasta memnuniyeti

Pages
279–283
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Multifocal IOL causes less limitation in daily tasks regarding near , intermediate and distance vision; and those factors make important contributions to the high satisfaction level with multifocal IOLs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the functional condition and patient satisfaction with multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in cataract cases and to assess the factors effecting the patient satisfaction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: The functional condition of the 32 eyes of 32 cataract patients with Array SA40N multifocal IOL were evaluated with the modified VF-14 questionnaire.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Multifocal IOL causes less limitation in daily tasks regarding near , intermediate and distance vision; and those factors make important contributions to the high satisfaction level with multifocal IOLs.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lens implantasyonu · göz içi · Hasta memnuniyeti

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the functional condition and patient satisfaction with multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in cataract cases and to assess the factors effecting the patient satisfaction. Material and Methods: The functional condition of the 32 eyes of 32 cataract patients with Array SA40N multifocal IOL were evaluated with the modified VF-14 questionnaire. The correlation between the patient satisfaction and the VF-14 score; and the distance and near visual acuities were evaluated. The relationship of different daily functions and patient satisfaction was assessed. The follow up period was 8.4±0.6 months. Results: In this retrospective study, average uncorrected visual acuity was 0.7±0.1, the best corrected visual acuity was 0.9±0.1. all the patients achieved at least Jaeger 4 or better near visual acuity. The average VF-14 score was calculated 82% in the near subgroup, 98.3% in the intermediate subgroup, and 94% in the distance subgroup. The activities that effected patient satisfaction were; reading traffic, street or store signs (r=0.3, p=0.18), watching television (r=0.32, p=0.11), cooking (r=0.403, p=0.02). According to the patient questionnaire; the patient satisfaction was at least 'good' or better. We calculated the patient satisfaction on a scale between the highest score of 5 (perfect) and the lowest of 1 (bad); the average patient satisfaction was 4.34 out of 5. Conclusion: The patient satisfaction is high in cataract patients with multifocal IOL implantation. Multifocal IOL causes less limitation in daily tasks regarding near , intermediate and distance vision; and those factors make important contributions to the high satisfaction level with multifocal IOLs.

Özet

Amaç: Multifokal göz içi lens (GİL) implante edilen katarakt hastalarının fonksiyonel yeterlilikleri ve hasta memnuniyetini değerlendirmek ve hasta memnuniyetini etkileyen faktörleri incelemek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmada, Array SA40N multifokal GİL implante edilen 32 katarakt hastasının 32 gözünün fonksiyonel durumları modifiye edilmiş VF-14 skoru, uzak ve yakın görme keskinlikleri ile hasta memnuniyeti arasındaki korelasyon değerlendirildi. VF-14 skoru, uzak ve yakın görme keskinlikleri ile hasta memnuniyeti arasındaki korelasyon değerlendirildi. Farklı günlük aktivitelerin hasta memnuniyetine etkisi araştırıldı. Takip süresi 8.2±0.6 ay idi. Bulgular: Tashihsiz görme keskinliği 0.7±0.1, en iyi görme keskinliği 0.9±0.1 idi. Hastaların tümü Jaeger 4 ve daha iyi yakın görmeler elde ettiler. VF-14 skoru ortalama %85.8±18.2 idi. Ortalama VF-14 skoru yakın grubu sorularında %82, ara mesafe alt grubunda %98,3, ve uzak mesafe alt grubunda ortalama %94 idi. Hasta memnuniyetini en fazla etkileyen aktiviteler; trafik, sokak veya dükkan tabelalarını okumak (r=0.3, p=0.18), televizyon izlemek (r=0.32, p=0.11), yemek hazırlamak (r=0.403, p=0.02) idi. Hasta memnuniyet anketinde tüm hastalar memnuniyetini en az 'iyi' olarak belirtirlerken, 5 en yüksek (mükemmel) ile 1 en düşük (kötü) değerleri arasında hesaplama yaptığımızda ortalama memnuniyet 5 üzerinden 4.34 olarak hesaplandı. Sonuç: Multifokal GİL implante edilen katarakt hastalarında ameliyat memnuniyeti yüksektir. Multifokal GİL, yakın, ara mesafe ve uzak görme keskinliğini ilgilendiren günlük işlerde daha az miktarda fonksiyonel kayıp sağlar. Bu faktörler multifokal GİL implante edilen hastalardaki yüksek hasta memnuniyetinin en önemli sebepleridir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİN, A. B., ELTUTAR, K. (2006). Modified VF-14 test application and patient satisfaction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 279–283. https://ajindex.com/articles/295838

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Lindstrom RL. Food and Drug Administration study update. One year results from 671 patients with the 3M multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 1993
  2. Bellucci R, Giardini P. Pseudoaccomodation with the 3M diffractive multifocal intraocular lens: a refraction study of 52 subjects. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993
  3. Boesten IE, Beekhuis WH, Hassmann rE, Pameyer JH, Baarsma GS. Comparison of the Storz bifocal zonal and the 3M diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995
  4. Gray PJ, Lyall MG. Diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implants for unilateral cataracts in prepresbyopic patients. Br J Ophthalmol 1992
  5. Steinert RF, Aker BL, Trentacost DJ, Smith PJ, Tarantino N. A prospective comperative study of the AMO Array zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 1996
  6. 55'. 6.Steinert RF. Visual outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2000
  7. Vaquero-Ruano M, Encinas JL, Millan I, Hijos M, Cajigal C. AMO Array multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses: long term follow up. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998
  8. Percival SP, Setty SS. Prospectively randomized trial comparing the pseudoaccomodation of the AMO Array multifocal lens and a monofocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993
  9. Negishi K, Bissen-Miyajima H, Kato K, Kurosaka D, Nagamoto T. Evaluation of a zonal progressive multifocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthlamol 1997
  10. Doane JF. Accomodating intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004
  11. Claoue C. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accomodating intraocular lens implantation
  12. prospective comparative evaluation of Array multifocal and ICU accomodating lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004
  13. Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, Javitt JC, Sharkey P, Cassard SD, ve ark. National study of cataract surgery outcomes. Variation in 4-month postoperative outcomes as reflected in multiple outcome measures. Ophthalmology 1994
  14. Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, et al. The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 1994
  15. Steinert RF, Post CT, Jr., Brint SF, Fritch CD, Hall DL, Wilder LW, ve ark. A prospective, randomized, double-masked comparison of a zonal-progressive multifocal intraocularlens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthal