SavedAdd your journal

Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2010 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Comparasion of conventional detachment surgery vitreoretinal surgery and combined procedure of conventional detachment surgery with vitreoretinal surgery in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Regmatojen retina dekolmanlı olgularda konvansiyonel dekolman cerrahisi vitreoretinal cerrahi ve eş zamanlı uygulanan konvansiyonel dekolman - vitreoretinal cerrahi sonuçlarını karşılaştırmak

Ayşegül KÖKSAL
Nil İrem UÇGUN
Mehmet ÖNEN
Zeliha YAZAR
Pages
106–111
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference between three groups on the postoperative success in rhegmatogeneus retinal detachment in terms of recurrent retinal detachments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To compare result of conventional detachment surgery , vitreoretinal surgery and combined approach of scleral buckle with pars plana vitrectomy in patients with rhegmatogeneus retinal detachment which is the most common type of all retinal detachments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: This study included 109 eyes of 109 patients that undergone surgery for rhegmatogeneous retinal detachment between January 2005- May 2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference between three groups on the postoperative success in rhegmatogeneus retinal detachment in terms of recurrent retinal detachments.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Vitreoretinal cerrahi · Karşılaştırmalı çalışma · Oftalmolojik cerrahi işlemler

Abstract

Aim: To compare result of conventional detachment surgery , vitreoretinal surgery and combined approach of scleral buckle with pars plana vitrectomy in patients with rhegmatogeneus retinal detachment which is the most common type of all retinal detachments. Material and Method: This study included 109 eyes of 109 patients that undergone surgery for rhegmatogeneous retinal detachment between January 2005- May 2009. The patients were evaluated for type of surgery , visual acuity, anatomical success and complications. Results: In group 1.53 (48.6%) patients underwent convantional surgery, 25 (22.9%) patients had vitreoretinal surgery in Group 2 and in Group 3, 31 (28.4%) patients underwent combined procedure of conventional detachment surgery with vitreoretinal surgery. 42 (79.2%) cases in Group 1.20 (80%) cases in Group 2 and 25 (80.7%) cases in Group 3, anatomically successful results were determined. Recurrent retinal detachment was observed in 9 (16.9%) patients in Group 1.5 (20%) patients in Group 2 and 5 (16.1%) patienst in Group 3 during the follow up period. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference between three groups on the postoperative success in rhegmatogeneus retinal detachment in terms of recurrent retinal detachments.

Özet

Amaç: Retina dekolmanlarının en sık görülen şekli olan regmatojen retina dekolmanlı olgularda konvansiyonel dekolman cerrahisi, vitreoretinal cerrahi ve eş zamanlı uygulanan konvansiyonel dekolman-vitreoretinal cerrahi sonuçlarını karşılaştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntem: 0cak 2005- Mayıs 2009 tarihleri arasında cerrahi uygulanan regmatojen retina dekolmanlı 109 hastanın 109 gözü çalışmaya alındı. Hastalar ameliyat şekli, görme keskinliği, anatomik başarı ve komplikasyonlar açısından değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Grup 1’de 53 (%48.6) hastaya konvansiyonel dekolman cerrahisi; Grup 2’de 25 (%22.9) hastaya pars plana vitrektomi; Grup 3’te 31 (%28.4) hastaya eş zamanlı konvansiyonel- vitreoretinal cerrahi uygulandı. Grup 1’de 42 (%79.2) olgu, grup 2’de 20 (%80) olgu ve grup 3’te 25 (%80.7) olguda anatomik olarak başarılı sonuçlar elde edildi. Grup 1’de 9 (%16.9) hastada, Grup 2’de 5 (%20) hastada ve Grup 3’te 5 (%16.1) hastada ameliyat sonrası nüks retina dekolmanı gelişti. Sonuçlar: Ameliyat sonrası dönemde nüks retina dekolmanı açısından değerlendirme yapıldığında üç grup arasında anlamlı bir farklılık saptanmadı.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖKSAL, A., UÇGUN, N. İ., ÖNEN, M., YAZAR, Z. (2010). Comparasion of conventional detachment surgery vitreoretinal surgery and combined procedure of conventional detachment surgery with vitreoretinal surgery in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 106–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/295828

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Ghazi NG, Gren WR. Pathology and pathogenesis of retinal detachment. Eye 2002; 16:411-21
  2. Schepens Cl, Marden D. Data on the natural history of retinal detachment: age and sex relationship. Arch Ophthalmol 1961; 66:631- 42
  3. Landers MB, Hegelmeleud LM. Types of pathogenetic mechanism of retinal detachment. In: Ryan SJ ed. Retina The CV Mosby Co, St. Louis 1989; 3: 111-49
  4. Kwun RC, Chang S. Perfluorocarbon liquids in vitreoretinal surgery. In: Ryan SJ and Wilkinson CP eds. 3rd ed. Retina. Mosby Co, St. Louis 2001; 3: 2287-316
  5. Feltgen N, Wolf S, Weiss C, Heimann H. Scleral buckling versus study: recruitment list evaluation. Study report no
  6. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007; 245: 803-9
  7. SPR Study Group. View 2: the case for primary vitrectomy. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87: 784-7
  8. Williams GA, Aaberg TM. Techniques of skleral buckling. In: Retina Vol 3. St. Louis, MO: The CV Mosby Co, 1989:111-49
  9. Schwartz SG, Kuhl DP, McPherson AR, Holz ER, Mieler WF. Twenty-year follow-up for scleral buckling. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 325-9
  10. Tani P, Robetson DM, Langworthy A. Regmatogenous retinal detachment with scleral buckling. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 90: 503-8
  11. Avcı R, Yazıcı B, Gelişken Ö. Yırtıklı retina dekolmanları: anatomik ve görsel sonuçlar. Ret Vit 1996; 2: 562-7
  12. Denveyi RG, de Carvalho Nakamura H. Combined scleral buckle and pars plana vitrectomy as a primary procedure for pseudophakic retinal detachments. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1999; 30: 615- 8
  13. Gürsel H, Sayar A, İnal B, ve Yılmaz ÖF. Konvansiyonel retina dekolmanı ameliyatlarında başarıyı etkileyen faktörler. T Oft Gaz 2002; 32: 692-8
  14. Yılmaz N, Dürük K. Retina dekolmanı cerrahisinde ameliyat öncesi faktörlerle komplikasyon gelişimi arasındaki bağlantı. T Klin Oftalmol 2004; 13: 59-67
  15. Bonnet M. The development of severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy after retinal detachment surgery. Grade B: a determining risk faktör. Grafes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988; 226: 201-5
  16. Asaria RH, Gregor ZJ. Simple retinal detachments: identifying the at-risk case. Eye 2002; 16: 404- 10
  17. Bozan E, Gürelik G. Proliferatif vitreoretinopati tedavisinde yeni deneysel ajanlar. Ret- Vit 2004; 12: 214-23
  18. Çıtırık M, Batman C, Biçer T, Özalp S, Aslan Ö, Zilelioğlu O. Proliferatif vitreoretinopati ile birlikte olan yırtıklı retina dekolmanlarında intravitreal triamsinolon asetonid uygulamasının postoperatif başarıya etkisi. Ret- Vit 2007; 15: 123-8
  19. Ivanisevic M. Con