SavedAdd your journal

Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2015 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Prophylactic Laser Photocoagulation Following Scleral Fixated Intraocular Lens Implantation

Skleral Fiksasyonlu Göziçi Lens İmplantasyonundan Sonra Koruyucu Lazer Fotokoagülasyon

Handan BARDAK
Yavuz BARDAK
Pages
153–156
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Prophylactic Argon LP following SFIOL implantation may be effective in prevention of RD.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of prophylactic Argon laser photocoagulation (LP) in prevention of retinal detachment (RD) following scleral fixated intraocular lens implantation (SFIOL).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: This retrospective study included 82 eyes of 82 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Prophylactic Argon LP following SFIOL implantation may be effective in prevention of RD.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of prophylactic Argon laser photocoagulation (LP) in prevention of retinal detachment (RD) following scleral fixated intraocular lens implantation (SFIOL). Material and Method: This retrospective study included 82 eyes of 82 patients. Preoperative diagnosis were as follow: aphakia 15 (18.29 %) patients, complicated cataract 28 (34.15%) patients, dropped nucleus or traumatic lens luxation 30 (36.58%) patients, subluxated IOL 9 (10.98%) patients. Three weeks after SFIOL implantation, 3 rows of prophylactic Argon LP was applied to 360o peripheral retina, in all patients. Results: The mean follow up was 7,01 (6-30) months. At post-operative 6th month, the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); did not changed in 5 (6.1%) patients, increased in 77 (93.9%) patients. Following the SFIOL implantation; vitreous haemorrhage [2 (2.44%) patients], hyphema [3 (3.66%) patients], IOL decentralisation [2 (2.44%) patients], IOL tilt [1 (1.22%) patients], transient corneal oedema [5 (6.1%) patients], transient increased intraocular pressure [4 (4.88%) patients], suture irritation [3 (3.66%) patients] were observed. RD was not observed in any patients. Conclusion: Prophylactic Argon LP following SFIOL implantation may be effective in prevention of RD.

Özet

Amaç: Skleral fiksasyonlu göziçi lensi (SFGİL) implantasyonu sonrası yapılan koruyucu Argon lazer fotokoagülasyon (LFK)'un, retina dekolmanı (RD)'nı önlemedeki etkisinin araştırılması.Gereç ve Yöntem: SFGİL implantasyonu yapılan 82 hastanın 82 gözü çalışmaya dahil edildi. Ameliyat öncesi tanılar; afaki 15 (%18,29)hasta, komplike katarakt 28 (%34,15) hasta,"drop nükleus" veya travmatik lens luksasyonu 30 (%36,58) hasta, arka kamara lensi sublüksasyonu 9 (%10,98) hasta olarak saptandı. Tüm hastalara; SFGİL implantasyonundan 3 hafta sonra, 360oüç sıra koruyucu LFK yapıldı. Bulgular: Ortalama takip süresi 7,01 aydı. Ameliyat sonrası 6. ayda, en iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği (EDGK); hastaların 5 (%6,1)'inde artmazken, 77 (%93,9) hastada arttı. SFGİL implantasyonunda, intraoperatif komplikasyon olmadı. SFGİL implantasyonu sonrası;vitreus hemorojisi [2 (%2,44) hasta], hifema [3 (%3,66) hasta], GİL desantralizasyonu [2 (%2,44) hasta], GİL tilti [1 (%1,22) hasta], geçicikornea ödemi [5 (%6,1) hasta], geçici göziçi basıncı yükselmesi [4 (%4,88) hasta], sütür iritasyonu [3 (%3,66) hasta] oldu. Hastaların hiçbirinde RD gelişmedi. Sonuç: SFGİL implantasyonu sonrası yapılan koruyucu Argon LFK, RD gelişimini önlemede etkin olabilir

🔖

Cite This Article

BARDAK, H., BARDAK, Y. (2015). Prophylactic Laser Photocoagulation Following Scleral Fixated Intraocular Lens Implantation. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 153–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/295663

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. McCluskey P, Harrisberg B. Long term results using scleralfixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1994;20:34-9
  2. Hussain M, Mehmood H, Durrani J, et al. Secondary implantation of IOL Pak. J Ophthalmol 1995;11:2631
  3. Malbran E, Drews R. Indications and techniques for scleral fixation and suturing of intraocular lenses to the posterior surface of the iris. Klin Oczna 1994 Feb;96(2):76-81
  4. Mutoh T, Matsumoto Y, Chikuda M. Use of pars plana vitrectomy with phacoemulsification in vitreous cavity to treat complete posterior dislocation of lens. Clin Ophthalmol 2011;5:937-40. doi: 10.2147 5. Kim SW, Kim MJ, Yang KS, et al. Risk factors for pseudophakic retinal detachment after intraocular lens scleral fixation with or without pars plana vitrectomy. Retina 2009;10:1479-85.doi:10. 1097 6. Bading G, Hillenkamp J, Sachs HG, et al. Long-term safety and functional outcome of combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral-fixated sutured posterior chamber lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:371-377
  5. Bourke RD, Gray PJ, Rosen PH, et al. Retinal detachment complicating scleral-sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens surgery. Eye 1996;10:501-8
  6. Yıldırım A, Özgün C, Gücükoğlu A.Transskleral arka kamara göziçi lens implantasyonları. In: Doğan ÖK, Aydın RÇ, TOD XXVIII. Ulusal Kongre Bülteni. Yeni İnan Ofset, Tekirdağ, 1994, Cilt 1;328-31
  7. Ersöz TR, Canataroğlu H, Özdemir VN ve ark. Lewis tekniği ile skleral fiksasyonlu arka kamara lens implantasyonları. In: Andaç K, Menteş J, Yağcı A ve ark. TOD XXVII. Ulusal Kongre Bülte ni. Yeniyol Matbaası, İzmir, 1993, Cilt 2;1445-50
  8. Kasım R, Aslan BS, Duman S. Transskleral fiksasyonlu arka kamara göziçi lensleri. In. Kural G, Duman S. TOD XXX Ulusal Kongre Bülteni 1996;Cilt 2;291-4
  9. Johnston RL, Charteris DG, Horgan SE, et al. Combined pars plana vitrectomy and sutured posterior chamber implant. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:905-10
  10. Ghazi NG, Green WR. Pathology and pathogenesis of retinal detachment. Eye (Lond) 2002;16:411-21
  11. Oshima Y, Awh CC, Tano Y. Self-retaining 27-gauge transconjunctival chandelier endoillumination for panoramic viewing during vitreous surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:166-7
  12. Zafar S, Bokhari SA, Kamil Z, et al.Outcomes of silicone oil removal. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2013;23:476-9
  13. Vivek C, Ryan PB, Kourous AR. Scleral depressed vitreous shaving, 360 laser, and perflouropropane for retinal detachment 2014;62:804-8
  14. Javitt JC, Stree