Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

To Examine The Effect of Anxiety Levels on Pain in Patients Undergoing Panretinal Photocoagulation Using Conventional and Multispot Laser

Konvansiyonel ve Çok Odaklı Lazer ile Panretinal Fotokoagülasyon Uygulanan Hastalarda Anksiyete Düzeyinin Algılanan Ağrı Üzerine Olan Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
92–96
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Multi-focus laser photocoagulator provides excellent patient compliance with low anxiety levels before procedure and less pain levels during laser than con- ventional laser systems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to evaluate preoperative anxiety levels and the effect of anxiety on pain in patients undergoing panretinal photoco- agulation with conventional laser and multi-focus laser systems for proliferative diabetic retinopathy Material and method: In our study enrolling sixty-eight patients who had undergoing panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative dia- betic retinopathy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thirty-four eye of 34 randomly selected patients underwent multi-focus laser two sessions and thirty-four eye of 34 patients underwent conventional laser in two sessions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Multi-focus laser photocoagulator provides excellent patient compliance with low anxiety levels before procedure and less pain levels during laser than con- ventional laser systems.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate preoperative anxiety levels and the effect of anxiety on pain in patients undergoing panretinal photoco- agulation with conventional laser and multi-focus laser systems for proliferative diabetic retinopathy Material and method: In our study enrolling sixty-eight patients who had undergoing panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative dia- betic retinopathy. Thirty-four eye of 34 randomly selected patients underwent multi-focus laser two sessions and thirty-four eye of 34 patients underwent conventional laser in two sessions. The level of anxiety was measured using the STAI FORM TX 1 anxiety assessment scale before the first and second session. The severity of the pain detected during the procedure was assessed using visual analogue scale at the end of the first and second sessions. Results: There were no significantly differences between the groups in terms of mean age, gender, HbA1c levels and mean diabetes dura- tion. The mean anxiety levels was significantly higher in the conventional laser group compared to multi-focus laser group in before second session (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant correlation between first session visual analogue scale score and before second session anxiety level (multi-focus laser r=0.464 p=0.006, conventional laser r=0.492 p=0.003). In addition, There was a statistically significant cor- relation between before second session anxiety level and second session visual analogue scale score in patients underwent conventional laser group (r=0.463 p=0.006). Conclusion: The pre-procedural high anxiety level in patients affects the level of pain perceived during the procedure. Multi-focus laser photocoagulator provides excellent patient compliance with low anxiety levels before procedure and less pain levels during laser than con- ventional laser systems.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada proliferatif diyabetik retinopati nedeniyle konvansiyonel lazer ve çok odaklı lazer sistemleri ile panretinal fotokoa- gülasyon uygulanan hastalarda işlem öncesi anksiyete düzeylerini karşılaştırmak ve anksiyete düzeylerinin ağrı üzerine olan etkisini değer- lendirmeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamıza proliferatif diyabetik retinopati nedeniyle panretinal fotokoagülasyon uygulanan 68 hasta dahil edildi. Çalışmaya alınan hastalardan rastgele seçilen 34 hastanın 34 gözüne çok odaklı patern tara ma lı lazer, 34 hastanın 34 gözüne ise konvansiyo- nel lazer ile iki hafta ara ile iki seansta panretinal fotokoagülasyon işlemi uygulandı. Birinci ve ikinci seans öncesi hissedilen kaygı düzeyi ank- siyete değerlendirme ölçeği olan STAI FORM TX 1 kullanılarak ölçüldü. Birinci ve ikinci seans sonunda, işlem sırasında algılanan ağrının şid- deti görsel analog skala kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Her iki grup arasında yaş, cinsiyet, HbA1c seviyesi ve diyabetin süresi arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmamakta idi. İkinci se- ans öncesi anksiyete düzeyinin konvansiyonel lazer grubunda çok odaklı patern tara ma lı lazer grubuna göre anlamlı derecede daha yüksek ol- duğu görüldü (p<0,001). Her iki grupta da ilk seans görsel analog skala ağrı skoru ile ikinci seans öncesi anksiyete düzeyi arasında anlamlı korelasyon olduğu görüldü (Çok odaklı patern tara ma lı lazer r=0,464, p=0,006, konvansiyonel lazer r=0,492, p=0,003). Ayrıca konvansiyo- nel lazer hasta grubunda ikinci seans öncesi anksiyete düzeyi ile ikinci seans görsel analog skala ağrı skoru arasında anlamlı korelasyon bu- lundu (r=0,463 p=0,006). Sonuç: Panretinal fotokoagülasyon işlemi öncesi yüksek anksiyete düzeyi, işlem sırasında algılanan ağrı seviyesini etkilemektedir. Çok odaklı patern tara ma lı lazer fotokoagülatör, işlem öncesi düşük anksiyete düzeyi ve lazer sırasında daha az hissedilen ağrı seviyeleri ile kon- vansiyonel lazer sistemlerine göre hasta uyumu açısından üstünlük sağlar.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUNEL, O., DEMİRCAN, S. (2018). To Examine The Effect of Anxiety Levels on Pain in Patients Undergoing Panretinal Photocoagulation Using Conventional and Multispot Laser. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 92–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/295416

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Klein BE. Overview of epidemiologic studies of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2007;14(4):179-83.
  2. Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R. et al. Meta-Analysis for Eye Disease (META-EYE) Study Group. Global prevalence and majör risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diab Care 2012;35(3):556-64.
  3. Klein BE, Klein R, McBride PE. et al. Cardiovascular disease, mortality, and retinal microvascular characteristics in type 1 dia- betes: Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Intern Med 2004;164(17):1917-24. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1991;98(5 Suppl):823-33. Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopaty; the second report of diabetic retinopaty study findings. Ophthal - mology 1978;85(1):82-106
  4. Vander JF, Duker JS, Benson WE, Brown G, McNamara JA, Rosenstein RB. Longterm stability and visual outcome after favo - urable initial response of proliferative diabetic retinopathy to pan- retinal photocoagulation. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1575-19. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group (1991b): Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS Report No. 9. Ophthalmology 1991;98(5):766-85.
  5. Çeliker H, Erdağı Bulut A, Şahin Ö. Comparison of Efficacy and Side Effects of Multispot Lasers and Conventional Lasers for Diabetic Retinopathy Treatment. Turk J Ophthalmol 2017;47(1): 34-41 Roider J. Brinkmann R. Wirbelauer C. Laqua H. Birngruber R. Subthreshold (retinal pigment epithelium) photocoagulation in macular diseases: a pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84(1):40- 47 Muqit MK. Gray JCB. Marcellino GR. et al. Fundus autofluores- cence and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography imaging of 10 and 20 ms Pascal retinal photocoagulation treatment. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93(4):518-25 Blumenkranz MS. Yellachich D. Andersen DE. et al. Semiautomated patterned scanning laser for retinal photocoagula- tiom. Retina 2006;26(3):370-6. Doft BH. Blankenship GW. Single versus multiple treatment ses- sions of argon laser panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1982;89(7):772-9. Al-Hussainy S. Dodson PM. Gibson JM. Pain response and fol- low-up of patients undergoing panretinal laser photocoagulation with reduced exposure times. Eye 2008;22(1):96-9. Badner NH. Nielson WR. Munk S. Kwiatkowska C. Gelb AW. Preoperative anxiety: Detection and contributing