Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Outcomes of Conjunctival - Müller’s Muscle Resection for Treatment of Unilateral Mild and Moderate Blepharoptosis

Tek Taraflı Hafif ve Orta Derece Blefaropitozis Tedavisinde Konjonktival - Müller Kas Rezeksiyonu Sonuçları

Pages
1–5
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It may be alternative the levator surgery in the appropriate patient group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the outcomes in patients with unilateral mild and moderate blepharoptosis who underwent conjunctival-Müller’s muscle resection surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: A total of 18 patients included in this study had unilateral ptosis and the phenylephrine test was positive.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It may be alternative the levator surgery in the appropriate patient group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes in patients with unilateral mild and moderate blepharoptosis who underwent conjunctival-Müller’s muscle resection surgery. Material and Method: A total of 18 patients included in this study had unilateral ptosis and the phenylephrine test was positive. Patients who underwent unilateral conjunctival-Müller’s muscle resection surgery between September 2016 and November 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Prior to surgery, levator function and marginal reflex distance (MRD1) were measured. Surgical success was defined as a difference of less than 1 mm in MRD1 between eyes that did and did not undergo surgery. Undercorrection was defined as a difference 1 mm or greater in MRD1 between eyes that did and did not undergo surgery. Overcorrection was defined as a greater MRD1 for eyes that underwent surgery than for eyes that did not undergo surgery. MRD1, surgical success, intraoperative and postoperative complications were analysed. Results: The patients comprised of 8 men (%44.4) and 10 women (%55.6), and their mean age was 50.1±11.8 years. MRD1 of eyes that underwent surgery was 2.2±0.7 mm preoperatively, 3.8±0.7 mm at postoperative 1 month (p<0.001). Surgical success was achieved in 15 patients (83.3%). Minimal overcorrection was observed in 2 patients (11.1%). Undercorrection was observed in one patient (5.5%) who underwent external levator advancement surgery in the following period. Intraoperative complications was not seen. Symptoms and signs of dry eye was not found in any patient postoperatively. Conclusion: Conjunctival-Müller’s muscle resection surgery is a effective and safe procedure in patients with unilateral blepharoptosis. It may be alternative the levator surgery in the appropriate patient group.

Özet

Amaç: Tek taraflı hafif ve orta derece blefaroptozisi olan hastalarda konjonktival-Müller kas rezeksiyonu cerrahisinin sonuçlarını değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Fenilefrin testi pozitif tek taraflı blefaroptozisi olan 18 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Eylül 2016 ile Kasım 2018 tarihleri arasında tek taraflı konjonktival-Müller kas rezeksiyonu cerrahisi uygulanan hastalar geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Cerrahi öncesi tüm hastaların levator fonksiyonu ve kapak refle mesafesi ölçüldü. Cerrahi başarı, cerrahi uygulanan göz ile uygulanmayan göz arasında kapak refle mesafesinin 1 mm’den az olması olarak tanımlandı. Yetersiz düzeltme, cerrahi uygulanan göz ile uygulanmayan göz arasında kapak refle mesafesinin 1 mm veya daha fazla olması olarak tanımlandı. Aşırı düzeltme, cerrahi uygulanan gözde kapak refle mesafesinin uygulanmayan göze göre fazla olması olarak tanımlandı. Kapak refle mesafesi, cerrahi başarı, intraoperatif ve postoperatif komplikasyonlar analiz edildi. Bulgular: Hastaların 8’i erkek (%44,4), 10’u kadın (%55,6) ve yaş ortalamaları 50,1±11,8 yıl idi. Cerrahi uygulanan gözde kapak refle mesafesi ameliyat öncesi 2,2±0,7 mm, ameliyat sonrası 1. ay 3,8±0,7 mm idi (p<0,001). 15 hastada cerrahi başarı sağlandı (%83,3). 2 hastada minimal aşırı düzeltme izlendi (%11,1). 1 hastada yetersiz düzelme olduğu izlendi ve sonraki dönemde eksternal levator ilerletme cerrahisi uygulandı (%5,5). İntraoperatif komplikasyon izlenmedi. Hiçbir hastada ameliyat sonrası kuru göz semptom ve bulguları saptanmadı. Sonuç: Konjonktival-Müller kas rezeksiyonu cerrahisi tek taraflı blefaroptozis hastalarında etkili ve güvenli bir uygulamadır. Uygun hasta grubunda levator cerrahisine iyi bir alternatif olabilir

🔖

Cite This Article

MANGAN, M. S., TEKCAN, H. (2020). Outcomes of Conjunctival - Müller’s Muscle Resection for Treatment of Unilateral Mild and Moderate Blepharoptosis. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 1–5. https://ajindex.com/articles/295331

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Lee JH, Nam SM, Kim YB. Blepharoptosis correction: levator aponeurosis-Muller muscle complex advancement with three partial incisions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(2):388-95
  2. Emsen IM. A new ptosis correction technique: A modification of levator aponeurosis advancement. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19(3): 669-74
  3. Putterman AM, Urist MJ. Müller muscle-conjunctiva resection: Technique for treatment of blepharoptosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93(8):619-23
  4. Fasanella RM. Surgery for minimal ptosis: The Fasanella-Servat operation. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1973;93:425-38
  5. Jones LT, Quickert MH, Wobig JL. The cure of ptosis by aponeurotic repair. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93(8):629-34
  6. McCord CD Jr. An external minimal ptosis procedure: External tarsoaponeurectomy. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1975;79(5):683-6
  7. Ünal M, Konuk O, Köksal M, Hasanreisoğlu B. Ptozisli olgunun değerlendirilmesinde ve cerrahinin seçiminde etiyolojik sınıflamanın önemi. MN Oftalmoloji. 1998;5(4):375-7
  8. Hoşal MB, Tekeli O, Gürsel E. Pitozis tedavisinde levator aponevroz cerrahisi. MN Oftalmoloji. 1998;5(1):72-5
  9. Uğurlu Ş, Atik S, Işık MR, Diniz G. Kronik progresif eksternal oftalmoplejili hastalarda pitozis cerrahisi sonuçları. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2014;44(5):379-83
  10. Jang SY, Chin S, Jang JW. Ten years’ experience with unilateral conjunctival mullerectomy in the Asian eyelid. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(4):879-86
  11. Ben Simon GJ, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA. Muller’s muscle-conjunctival resection for correction of upper eyelid ptosis: Relationship between phenylephrine testing and the amount of tissue resected with final eyelid position. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;9(6):413-17
  12. Yazıcı B, Salkaya M, Doğru M. Üst gözkapağı ptozisinde konjonktiva-Müller kası rezeksiyonu. T Oft Gaz. 2002;32:564-69
  13. Perry JD, Kadakia A, Foster JA. A new algorithm for ptosis repair using conjunctival Müllerectomy with or without tarsectomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;18(6):426-29
  14. Ozturk Karabulut G, Fazil K. Corneal Topographical Changes After Müller's Muscle-conjunctival Resection Surgery. Ophthal - mic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;35(2):177-81
  15. Golbert M, Pereira FJ, Garcia DM, Cruz AAV. Contour Symmetry of the Upper Eyelid Following Bilateral Conjunctival-Müller's Muscle Resection. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37(3):269-75
  16. Putterman AM, Urist MJ. Müller’s muscle-conjunctival resection ptosis procedure. Ophthalmic Surg. 1978;9(3):