SavedAdd your journal

Journals / MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 19

“The Sitting Goddess” from Perinthos: Some Ideas on the Workshop Problematic at Propontis Area in the Archaic Period

Perinthos’tan “Oturan Tanrıça”: Arkaik Dönem Propontis Çevresi Atölye Sorunsalı Üzerine Düşünceler

H. Arda BÜLBÜL
Pages
120–128
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, throughout Propontis, between the second half of the 6th century BC and the beginning of the 5th century BC, new ideas were introduced to the workshop problem of the region.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:When we consider the whole Thrace Region, it is noteworthy that researches on the material culture and the written texts are insufficient.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The recent increase of the studies in East Thracia, along with the settlements patterns, defense systems, sanctuaries and necropolis areas of the region enable to expand our knowledge of the socio-cultural structure, economic relations and belief systems of the people (local or foreign) living in the region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, throughout Propontis, between the second half of the 6th century BC and the beginning of the 5th century BC, new ideas were introduced to the workshop problem of the region.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

When we consider the whole Thrace Region, it is noteworthy that researches on the material culture and the written texts are insufficient. The recent increase of the studies in East Thracia, along with the settlements patterns, defense systems, sanctuaries and necropolis areas of the region enable to expand our knowledge of the socio-cultural structure, economic relations and belief systems of the people (local or foreign) living in the region. The main subject of the paper is “Naiskos stele with sitting Goddess”, which was discovered in the ancient city of Perinthos. The fact that the stele belongs to the Archaic Period will help us to obtain important data in terms of both the period of colonization and the belief systems, and also to present observations on the workshop where it was produced. In addition, throughout Propontis, between the second half of the 6th century BC and the beginning of the 5th century BC, new ideas were introduced to the workshop problem of the region.

Özet

Thrakia Bölgesi’nin geneline baktığımızda gerek materyal kültürün gerekse yazılı kaynakların yetersiz araştırılması dikkati çekmektedir. Özellikle son zamanlarda Doğu Thrakia’da (Türkiye Thrakiası) yapılan çalışmaların hız kazanması, bölgenin yerleşim modelleri, savunma sistemleri, kutsal alanları ve nekropolis alanları ile beraber, bölgede yaşayan halkın (yerli veya yabancı) sosyo-kültürel yapısı, ekonomik ilişkileri ve inanç sistemlerine dair bilgilerimizin genişlemesini sağlamaktadır. Çalışmanın ana konusunu oluşturan “Oturan Tanrıça Betimli Naiskos Tipli Adak Steli” Tekirdağ Perinthos antik kentinde bulunmuştur. Söz konusu stelin Arkaik Dönem’e ait olması hem kolonizasyon hem de inanç bağlamında önemli veriler elde etmemize, ayrıca üretilmiş olduğu atölyeye ilişkin gözlemlerin ortaya atılmasına yardımcı olacaktır. Ayrıca Propontis genelinde, MÖ 6. yüzyılın ikinci yarısı ile MÖ 5. yüzyılın başları arasında bölgenin atölye sorunsalına yeni düşünceler ortaya atılmasına olanak sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜLBÜL, H. A. (2019). “The Sitting Goddess” from Perinthos: Some Ideas on the Workshop Problematic at Propontis Area in the Archaic Period. MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 19, 120–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/294757

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adam- Veleni, P., Tsagaraki, E., Chatzinikolaou (Eds.) (2016). Rhaidestos- Thessaloniki. Antiquities in Refugee Journey, Thessaloniki: Archaeological Museum of Thessaloniki. Akurgal, E. (1965). Neue Archaische Bildwerke aus Kyzikos. Antike Kunst 8, ss. 99-103.
  2. Akurgal, E. (1998). Anadolu Kültür Tarihi. Ankara:
  3. TÜBİTAK. Bayburtluoğlu, C. (1970). Tekirdağ Kuros’u. Belleten 35, ss. 347-351.
  4. Bogh, B. (2012). Mother of the Gods: Goddess of Power and Protector of Cities. Numen 59, ss. 32-67.
  5. Bol, P. C. (2002). Die Geschichte der antiken Bildhauerkunst, I. Frühgriechische Plastik. Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern. Bruns-Özgan, (1989). Grabstelen gebildeter Jünglinge. Beiträge zur Ikonographie und Hermeneutik. Festschrift für Nikolaus Himmelmann, ss. 183-190. CCCA (1987/1989).
  6. Vermaseren, M.J., Corpus Cultus Cybelae Attidisque I-IV. Etudes préliminaires aux religions orientales dans l’Empire romain. Leiden: Brill. Doksanaltı, E.,- Özgan, R. (2008). Kilikya’dan Arkaik Devre ait iki kabartma üzerine düşünceler. Anatolia 32, ss. 1-20.
  7. Erpehlivan, H. (2019). Arkaik ve Klasik Dönem’de Propontis Çevresindeki Kültler ve Kutsal Alanlar. MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(3), İstanbul.
  8. Freyer- Schauenburg, B. (1974). Bildwerke der Archaischen Zeit und des Strengen Stils. Samos XI. Koçel-Erdem, Z. (2009). Preliminary Report of the Tekirdağ Ganos 2008 Survey. AnatAn, 17, ss. 411-426.
  9. Koçel-Erdem, Z. (2010). Tekirdağ Ganos 2009 Survey. AnatAn, 18, ss. 305-320.
  10. Kokkorou Alevros G. (1997). Ionian Sculpture of the Archaic Period on Dorian Rhodos. I. Jenkins- G.B. Waywell (Ed.), Sculptors and Sculpture of Caria and the Dodecanese, ss. 150-160.
  11. Laubscher, H. P. (1963/1964). Zwei neue Kouroi aus Kleinasien. İstMitt 13/14, ss. 73-87.
  12. Lullies, R.-Hirmer, M. (1957). Greek Sculpture. London: Thames and Hudson Naumann, F. (1983). Die Ikonographie der Kybele in der Phrygischen Kunst. IstMitt Beiheft 28. Neumann, G. (1979). Probleme des Griechischen Weihreliefs. Tübingen: Ernst Wasmuth. Özgan, R. (1978). Untersuchungen zur Archaischen Plastik Ioniens. Bonn: Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität. Pedley, J.G. (1976). Archaic Sculpture and Island Workshop. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern. Richter, G.,M.,A. (1968). Korai,. London: R. & R. Clark. Rohaut, L. (2015). Les Naiskoi Archaiques de Milet. La Sculpture Greco-Romaine en Asie Mineure. Synthese et Recherces Recentes, ss. 103-122.
  13. Roller, L.E. (2004). Ana Tanrıça’nın İzinde Anadolu’da Kybele Kültü (Çev. B. Avunç). İstanbul: Homer. Rose,