Journals / Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi / 2010 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3

Problematic internet use in the psychiatric sample compared community sample

Psikiyatrik bozukluğu olan ve olmayan ergenlerde problemli internet kullanımı

Pages
241–246
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: This study has supported the relationship between PIU and psychopathology among adolescents which is more pronounced in adolescents with ADHD.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the characteristics of internet use and Problematic Internet Use (PIU) in adolescents with and without psychiatric disorder.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The present study was performed on 884 adolescents, who were in the age group of 12 to 18 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: This study has supported the relationship between PIU and psychopathology among adolescents which is more pronounced in adolescents with ADHD.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the characteristics of internet use and Problematic Internet Use (PIU) in adolescents with and without psychiatric disorder. Methods: The present study was performed on 884 adolescents, who were in the age group of 12 to 18 years. Each o psychiatric sample (PS) and community sample (CS) included 442 age/gender matched adolescents. PS were patients at the child and adolescent psychiatry departments of Cukurova, Mersin and Akdeniz Universities. Online Cognition Scale (OCS) was used for PIU. Results: The most common diagnoses in PS were attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; n: 260), followed by anxiety disorders (AD; n: 96), mood disorders (MD; n: 55), and other disorders (OD; n: 31, 7.0%). 23.3% of participants in PS and 10.6% in CS reported use of internet for more than 8 hours/week (p=0.0001). Additionally, mean OCS scores of participants in PS were significantly higher than those in CS (p=0.0001). The highest OCS score average was observed in the ADHD group and it was significantly higher than that in CS (p=0.0001). Conclusion: This study has supported the relationship between PIU and psychopathology among adolescents which is more pronounced in adolescents with ADHD.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı psikiyatrik bozukluğu olan ve olmayan ergenlerde internet kullanım özelliklerinin ve Problemli İnternet Kullanımının (PİK) araştırılmasıdır. Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 12-18 yaşında 884 ergen katılmıştır. Psikiyatrik örneklem (PÖ) ve Toplum örnekleminin (TÖ) her birinde yaş/cinsiyet eşlenmiş 442 ergen bulunmaktadır. PÖ’de yer alanlar Çukurova - Mersin - Akdeniz Üniversitesi Çocuk Psikiyatrisi Polikliniklerine başvuran hastaları içermektedir. PİK internette bilimsel durum ölçeği (İBDÖ) ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: PÖ’de en sık tanı dikkat eksikliği hiper aktivite bozukluğudur (DEHB; n:260); bunu kaygı bozuklukları (KB; n:96) duygudurum bozuklukları (DDB; n:55) ve diğer bozukluklar (DB; n:31) izlemektedir. PÖ’de yer alan ergenlerin %23.3’ü haftada 8 saatten fazla internet kullandığını bildirirken, TÖ’de bu oran %10.6’dır (p=0.0001). PÖ’de yer alan ergenlerin İBDÖ ortalaması TÖ’de yer alanlardan yüksektir (p=0.0001). En yüksek İBDÖ ortalamalarının DEHB grubunda gözlenmiştir ve TÖ’den anlamlı biçimde farklıdır (p=0.0001). Sonuç: Bu çalışma ergenlerde psikopatoloji ve PİK ilişkisini desteklemektedir ve bu ilişki DEHB’li ergenler için daha belirgindir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAHİROĞLU, A. Y., ÇELİK, G. G., FETTAHOĞLU, Ç., YILDIRIM, V., TOROS, F., AVCI, A., ÖZATALAY, E., UZEL, M. (2010). Problematic internet use in the psychiatric sample compared community sample. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3, 241–246. https://ajindex.com/articles/292892

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Cao F, Su L. Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: prevalence and psychological features. Child Care Health Dev 2007; 33:275-81
  2. Kratzer S, Hegerl U. Is "Internet Addiction" a disorder of its own?--a study on subjects with excessive internet use. Psychiatry Prax 2008; 35:80-3
  3. Shapira NA, Goldsmith TD, Keck PE et al. Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic internet use. J Affect Disord 2000; 57:267-2
  4. Griffiths M. Internet gambling: issues, concerns, and recommendations. Cyberpsychol Behav 2003; 6:557-68
  5. Morgan C, Cotten SR. The relationship between Internet activities and depressive symptoms in a sample of college freshmen. Cyberpsychol Behav 2003; 6:133-42
  6. Kraut P, Patterson M, Lundmark V et al. Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being. Am J Psychol 1998; 53:1017-31
  7. Anderson KJ. Internet use among college students: an exploratory study. J Am Col Health, 2001; 50:21-6
  8. Lo SK, Wang CC, Fang W. Physical Interpersonal Relationships and Social Anxiety among Online Game Players. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005; 8:15-22
  9. Peris R, Gimeno MA, Pinazo D et al. Online chat rooms: virtual spaces of interaction for socially oriented people. Cyberpsychol Behav 2002; 5:43-51
  10. Young K. Psychology of computer use: XL. Addictive use of the Internet: a case that breaks the stereotype. Psychol Rep 1996; 79:899-902
  11. Whang LSM, Lee S, Chang G. Internet over-users’ psychological profiles: a behavior sampling analysis on Internet addiction. Cyberpsychol Behav 2003; 6:143-50
  12. Shepherd RM, Edelmann RJ. Reasons for internet use and social anxiety. Pers Individ Dif 2005; 39:949-58
  13. Grüsser SM, Thalemann R, Albrecht U et al. Excessive computer usage in adolescents--results of a psychometric evaluation. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2005; 117:173-5
  14. Weiss M, Weiss G. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Lewis M, editor. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, A Comprehensive Textbook içinde. Philadelphia: Lippincott William and Wilkins; 2002; 647-50
  15. Yoo HJ, Cho SC, Ha J et al. Attention deficit hyperactivity symptoms and internet addiction. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2004; 58:487-94
  16. Chan P, Rabinowitz T. A cross-sectional analysis of video games and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in adolescents. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2006; 5:16
  17. Greenberg JL, Lewis SE, Dodd DK. Overlapping addictions and self-esteem among college men and women. Addict Behav 1999; 24