Journals / Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi / 2010 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3

The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the obsessive beliefs questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44)

Obsesif inanışlar ölçeği-44'ün (OİÖ-44) Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirliği

Pages
216–222
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the OBQ-44 has adequate validity and reliability in clinical and nonclinical Turkish sample.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Cognitive factors have a central place in the etiology and persistence of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the study was to evaluate psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The Turkish version of the OBQ-44 has adequate validity and reliability in clinical and nonclinical Turkish sample.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive factors have a central place in the etiology and persistence of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The aim of the study was to evaluate psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44). Original factor structure of the OBQ-44 and discrimination characteristic of the instrument between OCD patients and nonclinical population were evaluated extensively in Turkish sample. Methods: Data were collected from 175 healthy subjects and 62 patients with OCD who applied to the Psychiatry Clinic at Yüzüncü Yıl University. Subjects were administered the SCID-I, the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44), the Padua Inventory (PI-41), the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOKS), the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30), the Thought Action Fusion Scale (TAFS), the White Bear Suppression Inventory (WBSI), the Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity (PIOS), the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Data were analyzed in order to evaluate the reliability and validity of the OBQ-44. Results: The three-factor original structure tested using confirmatory factor analysis was observed to be highly consistent with the data obtained from the study. OCD patients reported significantly higher scores on OBQ-44 rather than controls. Correlations of the OBQ-44 scores with psychological variables were generally significant. Inner consistency coefficient for the OBQ-44 was a0,95 and test-retest correlation between two points at 30-day time course was r=0.79. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the OBQ-44 has adequate validity and reliability in clinical and nonclinical Turkish sample.

Özet

Amaç: Obsesif kompulsif bozukluğun (OKB) etiyolojisinde ve süreğenliğinde bilişsel faktörler merkezde yer almaktadır. Bu çalışmada OİÖ-44’un Türkçe formunun psikometrik özelliklerinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Türk örnekleminde OİÖ-44’ün orijinal faktör yapısı ve ölçme aracının OKB hastaları ve klinik olmayan bireyleri ayırt edebilme özelliğinin ayrıntılı bir değerlendirmesi yapılmıştır. Yöntem: Çalışmanın verileri 175 sağlıklı birey ve Y.Y.Ü. Tıp Fakültesi psikiyatri kliniğine başvuran 62 OKB hastasından elde edildi. Çalışmaya katılan kişilere SCID-I, Obsesif İnançlar Ölçeği-44 (OİÖ-44), Padua Envanteri (PE-41), Yale-Brown Obsesyon Kompülsiyon Ölçeği (YBOKÖ), Üst Biliş Ölçeği – 30 (ÜBÖ-30), Düşünce Eylem Kaynaşması Ölçeği (DEKÖ), Beyaz Ayı Supresyon Envanteri (BASE), Dini Kaygılar Ölçeği (DKÖ), Penn State Endişe Ölçeği (PSEÖ) ve Beck Depresyon Envanteri (BDE) uygulanmıştır. OBQ-44 toplam ve alt ölçekleri için geçerlik ve güvenirlik düzeylerini gösteren istatistikler hesaplanmıştır. Bulgular: Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi kullanılarak test edilen üç faktörlü orijinal yapının çalışmanın verilerle (VERILERIYLE?)uyumu yüksek bulunmuştur. OKB hastaları sağlıklı kontrollere göre önemli düzeyde daha yüksek ÖİÖ-44 puanları bildirmiştir. OİÖ-44 puanları ve diğer ölçekler arasında genel olarak önemli bağıntı düzeyleri elde edilmiştir. OİÖ-44 için iç turtalılık katsayısı a0,95 ve 30 günlük test tekrar test korelasyonu r=0.79’dur. Sonuç: OİÖ-44’ün Türkçe formu klinik ve klinik olmayan Türk örnekleminde yeterli geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğe sahip bir ölçme aracıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOYSAN, M., BEŞİROĞLU, L., ÇETİNKAYA, N., ATLI, A., AYDIN, A. (2010). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the obsessive beliefs questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44). Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3, 216–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/292702

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Beşiroğlu L, Ağargün MY. Obsesif kompulsif bozuklukta sağlık yardımı arama davranışı ile ilişkili etmenler: hastalık ile ilişkili ve genel etmenlerin rolü. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2006; 17:213-22
  2. Rachman SJ, de Silva P. Abnormal and normal obsessions. Behav Res Ther 1978; 16:233-48
  3. Salkovskis P, Harrison J. Abnormal and normal obsessions: A replication. Behav Res Ther 1984; 22:549-52
  4. Purdon C, Clark DA. Obsessive intrusive thoughts in nonclinical subjects: part I. Content and relation with depressive, anxious and obsessional symptoms. Behav Res Ther 1993; 31:713-20
  5. Salkovskis PM. Obsessional compulsive problems: a cognitive-behavioural analysis. Behav Res Ther 1985; 23:571-83.PDF 6. Salkovskis PM. Cognitive-behavioural factors and the persistence of intrusive thoughts in obsessional problems. Behav Res Ther 1989; 27:677-82
  6. Taylor S, Kyrios M, Thordarson DS et al. Development and validation of instruments for measuring intrusions and beliefs in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Cognitive approaches to obsessions and compulsions: Theory, research and treatment, RO Frost, G Steketee, editörler. Oxford: Elsevier; 2002; s. 117-38
  7. Wells A. Emotional disorders and metacognition: innovative cognitive therapy. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2000; s. 179-99
  8. Shafran R, Rachman S. Thought-action fusion:a review. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2004; 35:87-107
  9. Clark DA, Purdon C. New perspectives for a cognitive theory of obsessions. Australian Psychology 1993; 28:161-67
  10. Purdon C, Clark DA. Suppression of obsession like thoughts in nonclinical individuals: impact on thought frequency, appraisal, and mood state. Behav Res Ther 2001; 39:1163-81
  11. Abramowitz JS, Huppert JD, Cohen AB et al. Religious obsessions and compulsions in a non-clinical sample: the Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity (PIOS). Behav Res Ther 2002; 40:825-38
  12. Wells A, Papageorgiou C. Relationships between worry, obsessive–compulsive symptoms and meta-cognitive beliefs. Behav Res Ther 1998; 36:899-913
  13. Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group. Cognitive assessment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behav Res Ther 1997; 35:667-81
  14. Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group. Development and initial validation of the obsessive beliefs questionnaire and the interpretation of intrusions inventory. Behav Res Ther 2001; 39:987-1006
  15. Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group. Psychometric validation of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire and the interpretation of