Journals / Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi / 2009 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 4

Türkiye’de çocuk ve ergen ruh sağlığı yataklı servisleri, gerekli mi ve işe yarıyor mu?

Child and adolescent mental health ınpatient services in Turkey: Is there a need and are they effective?

Pages
143–148
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion: We believe that it is crucial and valuable to demonstrate the positive outcome of child and adolescent inpatient treatment in our country, while new legislative bodies have been discussing the National Mental Health Act.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Inpatient care is the most widely used intensive care component of child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) internationally.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The data was collected from the individual case files of the patients who had inpatient care in the Dokuz Eylül School of Medicine CAMH Inpatient Unit between January 2006 and May 2008.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion: We believe that it is crucial and valuable to demonstrate the positive outcome of child and adolescent inpatient treatment in our country, while new legislative bodies have been discussing the National Mental Health Act.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Geriyedönük çalışma · Ergen · Çocuk

Abstract

Objective: Inpatient care is the most widely used intensive care component of child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) internationally. In some studies, child and adolescent inpatient care has been shown to be effective and remains a neccesary function of a comprehensive child and adolescent mental health service. Our aim is to examine the treatment outcome of our newly opened CAMHS inpatient unit in terms of patients functioning levels via key variables which were measured at two time periods, namely (i) at admission to the unit and (ii) at discharge. Methods: The data was collected from the individual case files of the patients who had inpatient care in the Dokuz Eylül School of Medicine CAMH Inpatient Unit between January 2006 and May 2008. The difference in the level of severity of psychopathology of the patient at admission and at discharge was examined with different variables. Moreover, psychiatric diagnosis of the patients, psychopharmacological treatment details and length of stay were also evaluated. Results: Consistent with the previous research, the present study shows that all the measures of treatment response of young people admitted to our inpatient unit improved substantially from admission to discharge. Discussion: We believe that it is crucial and valuable to demonstrate the positive outcome of child and adolescent inpatient treatment in our country, while new legislative bodies have been discussing the National Mental Health Act.

Özet

Amaç: Yataklı tedavi modeli, tüm dünyada çocuk ve ergen ruh sağlığında yaygın olarak kullanılan yoğun bir tedavi ve rehabilitasyon şeklidir. Bazı çalışmalarda, çocuk ve ergen ruh sağlığı yataklı servislerinin etkili olduğu bulunmuş ve çocuk ve ergen ruh sağlığı bütüncül yaklaşımlarında önemli bir unsurdur. Bu çalışmadaki amacımız, yeni açılan servisimizde tedavi gören çocuk ve ergenlerin hastane dosyalarındaki bilgiler ve bulgulardan yararlanarak, iki önemli zaman diliminde; (i) yatışta ve (ii) taburculuktaki bazı ölçümlerden yararlanarak tedavinin etkinliğini göstermektir. Yöntemler: Ocak 2006-Mayıs 2008 tarihleri arasında, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Çocuk ve Ergen Ruh Sağlığı Servisi (ÇERSS)’nde yatarak tedavi gören ve taburcu edilen hastaların kayıtları geriye dönük olarak incelenmiştir. Hastaların yatış ve çıkışta psikopatolojilerinin şiddetini değerlendirmek amacı ile farklı değişkenlerden yararlanılmıştır. Buna ek olarak, hastaların psikiyatrik tanıları, psikofarmakolojik tedavilerinin detayları ve yatış süreleri ayrıca incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Daha önce bu alanda yapılan çalışma sonuçlarına uyumlu olarak, bizim çalışmamızda da ÇERSS yataklı servisinde yatan hastaların tedavi sonuçlarını değerlendirme ölçütlerinin hepsinde yatış ve taburculuk arasında anlamlı düzeyde fark olduğu gösterilmiştir. Tartışma: Ülkemizde ruh sağlığı politikalarının belirlendiği ve ruh sağlığı eylem planları üzerinde tartışıldığı bu dönemde çocuk ve ergen ruh sağlığı hizmetlerinin en gelişmiş ve en yoğun şekli olan yataklı tedavilerin gerekliliği ve etkinliğinin gösterilmesinin önemine inanmaktayız.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜVENİR, T., TAŞ, V. F., ÖZBEK, A. (2009). Türkiye’de çocuk ve ergen ruh sağlığı yataklı servisleri, gerekli mi ve işe yarıyor mu?. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 4, 143–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/292691

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. World Health Organization. Child and Adolescent Mental Health Policies and Plans. Mental Health Policy and Service Guidance Package 2005
  2. McDougall T, Worrall-Davies A, Hewson L et al. Tier 4 child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) – in-patient care, day services and alternatives: an overview of tier CAMHS provision in the UK. Child and Adolescent Mental Health 2008; 13:173-80
  3. Green J, Kroll L, Imrie D et al. Health gain and outcome predictors during inpatient and related day treatment in child and adolescent psychiatry. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001; 40:325-32
  4. Jaffa T, Stott C. Do patients on adolescent units recover? A study of outcome and acceptability of treatment. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999; 8:292-300
  5. O’Herlihy A, Worrall A, Lelliott P et al. Distribution and characteristics of the patient in child and adolescent mental health services in England. Br J Psychiatry 2003; 183:547-51
  6. Green J, Jacobs B, Beecham J et al. Inpatient treatment in child and adolescent psychiatry-a prospective study of health gain and costs. J Child Psychol and Psychiatry 2007; 48:1259-67
  7. Sourander A, Piha J. Three-year follow-up of child psychiatric inpatient treatment. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1998; 7:153-62
  8. Royal College of Psychiatrists Quality Network for Inpatient CAMHS. Service Standards 2005/2006. London: College Research Unit 2005
  9. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, edition 4. Washington, American Psychiatric Association 1994
  10. Shaffer D, Gould MS, Brasic J et al. A children's global assessment scale (CGAS). Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983; 40:1228-31
  11. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurol and Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960; 23:56-62
  12. Kovacs M. The children’s depression inventory (CDI). Psychopharmacol Bull 1985; 21:995-8
  13. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE et al. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry 1978; 133:429-35
  14. Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1987; 13:261-76
  15. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA et al. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. I. development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989; 46:1006-11
  16. Gavidia-Payne S, Littlefiield L, Hallgren M et al. Outcome evaluation of a statewide child inpatient mental health unit. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2003;37:204-11
  17. Mayes DS, Calhoun SL