Journals / Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi / 2015 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1

Sosyal Anksiyete Bozukluğunda Dikkat Yanlılığı ve Eğitimi

Attentional Bias and Training in Social Anxiety Disorder

Pages
4–7
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Attention processes, attentional bias and attentional training in SAD are discussed in this review

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the most effective treatment modalities for social anxiety disorder (SAD), showing a high level of clinical evidence supporting its effectiveness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On the other hand, lack of the desired benefit from this treatment in some patients causes continuation of the search for new techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Attention processes, attentional bias and attentional training in SAD are discussed in this review
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the most effective treatment modalities for social anxiety disorder (SAD), showing a high level of clinical evidence supporting its effectiveness. On the other hand, lack of the desired benefit from this treatment in some patients causes continuation of the search for new techniques. Recent research studies have focused on attentional bias and attention training in SAD. Attention processes in SAD have been a major target of interest and investigation since the introduction of the first cognitive models explaining SAD. In the first model, it was highlighted that attention was self-focused. The relationship between threatening stimuli and attention was considered in the subsequent models. Attentional bias towards threat may take place in several ways, such as facilitated processing of threat, difficulty in disengaging attention from the threat and avoidance of attention from the threat. After these descriptions regarding the phenomenology of the disorder, treatments to modify attention, processes were developed. In spite of conflicting results, investigations on attentional training are promising. Attention processes, attentional bias and attentional training in SAD are discussed in this review

Özet

Bilişsel davranışçı terapi (BDT) sosyal anksiyete bozukluğunda (SAB ) kanıt düzeyi yüksek, en iyi sonuç alınan tedavi yöntemlerinden biridir. Öte yandan, bazı hastalarda bu tedaviden istenilen yararın elde edilememesi, yeni teknikler arayışının devamına neden olmaktadır. SAB'da son araştırmalar dikkat yanlılığına ve dikkat eğitimine odaklanmıştır. SAB'da dikkat süreçleri rahatsızlığın bir bilişsel bozukluk olarak açıklandığı ilk modellerden bu yana araştırmaların hedefi olmuştur. İlk modelde, dikkatin kişinin kendi üzerine odaklı olduğu vurgulanmıştır. Tehdit edici uyaranlar ve dikkat arasındaki ilişki daha sonraki modellerde kabul edilmiştir.Tehdite yönelik dikkat yanlı-lığı tehditin kolaylaştırılmış işlenmesi, dikkatin tehditten uzaklaştırılmasında zorlanma, dikkatin tehditten kaçırılması şeklinde oluşabilir. Hastalık süreci-ne getirilen bu açıklamalar sonrasında, dikkat süreçlerini değiştirmek için tedaviler geliştirilmiştir. Çelişkili sonuçlara rağmen, dikkat eğitimi araştırma-ları ümit vericidir. Bu derlemede SAB'da dikkat süreçleri, dikkat yanlılıkları ve dikkat eğitimi konuları tartışılmıştı

🔖

Cite This Article

FISTIKÇI, N., SAATÇİOĞLU, Ö., KEYVAN, A., TOPÇUOĞLU, V. (2015). Sosyal Anksiyete Bozukluğunda Dikkat Yanlılığı ve Eğitimi. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1, 4–7. https://ajindex.com/articles/292425

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prev- alence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the national comor- bidity survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62:593-602. [CrossRef] Stein M, Kean Y. Disability and quality of life in social phobia: Epidemiologic findings. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157:1606-1613. [CrossRef] Özgüven HD, Sungur MZ. Sosyal fobi. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 1998; 9:128-138.
  2. Norton PJ, Price EC. A meta-analytic review of adult cognitive-behavior- al treatment outcome across the anxiety disorders. J Nerv Ment Dis 2007; 195:521-531. [CrossRef] Clark DM, Wells A. A cognitive model of social phobia. Heimberg RG, Li- ebowitz MR, Hope DA, Schneier FR, (eds). Social Phobia: Diagnosis, Assess- ment, and Treatment. New York: Guilford Press; 1995; s.69-93.
  3. Davidson JR, Foa EB, Huppert JD, Keefe FJ, Franklin ME, Compton JS, Connor KM, Lynch TR, Gadde KM. Fluoxetine, comprehensive cognitive behavioral therapy, and placebo in generalized social phobia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61:1005-1013. [CrossRef] Beck AT. Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders. New York: Interna- tional Universities Press; 1976. Eysenck MW. Anxiety: The Cognitive Perspective. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 1992.
  4. Beck AT, Clark DA. An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes. Behav Res Ther 1997; 35:49-58. [CrossRef] Wells A, Matthews G. Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Hove, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994.
  5. Williams JMG, Watts FN, MacLeod C, Mathews A. Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1988.
  6. Mogg K, Bradley BP. A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behav Res Ther 1998; 36:809-848. [CrossRef] Eysenck MW, Derakshan N, Santos R, Calvo MG. Anxiety and cognitive perfor- mance: Attentional control theory. Emotion 2007; 7:336-353. [CrossRef] Bar-Haim Y, Lamy D, Pergamin L, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van IJzendoorn MH. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Bull 2007; 133:1-24. [CrossRef] Yiend J, Mathews A. Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures. Q J Exp Psychol A 2001; 3:665-681. [CrossRef] MacLeod C, Mathews A, Tata P. Attentional bias in emotional disorders. J Abnorm Psychol 1986; 95:15-20. [CrossRef] De Ruiter C, Brosschot JF. The emotional Stroop interference effect in anx- iety: Attentional bias or cognitive avoidance? Behav Res Ther 1994; 32:315- 319. [