SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3

Distrust in organization: A qualitative cross-cultural study

Örgüte güvensizlik: Kültürlerarası nitel bir çalışma

S. Arzu WASTI
K. Duygu ERDAŞ
UZAY DURAL ŞENOĞUZ
Pages
525–552
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We observed both similarities as well as differences between Turkey and the Netherlands in terms of the importance attributed to these factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We conducted a qualitative cross-cultural study to explore the antecedents of employee distrust in organization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results of semi-structured interviews with white-collar workers from Turkey (n = 19) and the Netherlands (n = 19) indicate that distrust in organization is affected by institutional, organizational and individual level variables.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We observed both similarities as well as differences between Turkey and the Netherlands in terms of the importance attributed to these factors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We conducted a qualitative cross-cultural study to explore the antecedents of employee distrust in organization. The results of semi-structured interviews with white-collar workers from Turkey (n = 19) and the Netherlands (n = 19) indicate that distrust in organization is affected by institutional, organizational and individual level variables. Moreover, similar to interpersonal trust, the most significant antecedents of distrust in organization are associated with the well-established factors of trustworthiness, namely ability, benevolence and integrity. We observed both similarities as well as differences between Turkey and the Netherlands in terms of the importance attributed to these factors.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, örgüte güvensizliğin öncülleri ve bunların kültürlerarası farklılık gösterip göstermediği incelenmektedir. Türk (n = 19) ve Hollandalı (n = 19) beyaz yakalı çalışanlar ile yapılan yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşmeler sonucunda elde edilen bulgular, örgüte güvensizliğin çevresel, örgütsel ve kişisel değişkenlerden etkilenen bir kavram olduğuna işaret etmektedir. Bununla beraber, örgüte güvensizlik öncüllerinin çoğunun kişilerarası güvende olduğu gibi (Mayer ve ark., 1995) yetenek, iyi niyet ve dürüstlük olarak adlandırılan güvenilirlik etmenlerinin öncülleri olduğu görülmektedir. Ayrıca güvensizlik oluşumunda bu öncüllere atfedilen rollerin Türkiye ve Hollanda arasında hem benzerlik hem de farklılıklar gösterdiği dikkati çekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

WASTI, S. A., ERDAŞ, K. D., ŞENOĞUZ, U. D. (2013). Distrust in organization: A qualitative cross-cultural study. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3, 525–552. https://ajindex.com/articles/291993

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. BIGLEY, A. G. ve PEARCE, J. (1998), “Straining for Shared Meaning in Organization Science: Problems of Trust and Distrust”, The Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 405-421.
  2. BLUHM, D. J., HARMAN, W., LEE, T. W. ve MITCHELL, T. R. (2011), “Qualitative Research in Management: A Decade of Progress”, Journal of Management Studies, 48 (8), 1866-1891.
  3. BRANZEI, O., VERTINSKY, I. ve CAMP, R. D. (2007), “Culture-Contingent Signs of Trust in Emergent Relationships”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104 (1), 61-82.
  4. BREWER, M. ve CHEN, Y. (2007), “Where (Who) are Collectives in Collectivism? Toward Conceptual Clarification of Individualism and Collectivism”, Psychological Review, 114 (1), 133-151.
  5. CALDWELL, C. ve CLAPHAM, S.E. (2003), “Organizational Trustworthiness: An International Perspective”, Journal of Business Ethics, 47 (4), 349-358.
  6. COLQUITT, J.A. ve RODELL, J.B. (2011), “Justice, Trust, and Trustworthiness: A Longitudinal Analysis Integrating Three Theoretical Perspectives”, Academy of Management Journal, 54 (6), 1183-1206.
  7. COLQUITT, J.A., CONLON, D.E., WESSON, M.J., PORTER, C. ve NG, K.Y. (2001), “Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 years of Organizational Justice Research”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3), 425-445.
  8. CREED, W. ve MILES, R. (1996), “Trust in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework Linking Organizational Forms, Managerial Philosophies and the Oppurtunity Costs of Controls”. R. Kramer, ve T. Tyler (der.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research içinde, Thousand Oaks: Sage, s. 16-38.
  9. CROPANZANO, R. S., KACMAR, K. M. ve BOZEMAN, D. P. (1995), “The Social Setting of Work Organizations: Politics, Justice, and Support”. R. S. Cropanzano ve K. M. Kacmar (der.), Organizational Politics, Justice, and Support: Managing the Social Climate of the Workplace içinde, Westport, CT: Quorum, s. 2-18.
  10. DE GIER, E. ve OOIJENS, M. (2004), “The Dutch Welfare State and Social Security System”. E. de Gier, A. de Swaan, M. Ooijens (der.), Dutch Welfare Reform in an Expanding Europe: the Neighbors’ View içinde, Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis, s.15-34.
  11. DEMİRCAN, N. ve CEYLAN, A (2003), “Örgütsel Güven Kavramı: Nedenleri ve Sonuçları”, Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Dergisi, 10 (2), 139-150.
  12. DIETZ, G. ve DEN HARTOG, D. N. (2006), “Measuring Trust inside Organisations”, Personnel Review, 35 (5), 557-588.
  13. DIETZ, G., GILLESPIE, N. ve CHAO, G.T. (2010), “Unravelling the Complexities of Trust and Culture.”, M. Saunders, D. Ski