SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1

The effect of perceived job insecurity on organizational mobility preferences: The moderating role of perceived employability

Algılanan iş güvencesizliğinin örgütler arası hareketlilik tercihine etkisi: Algılanan istihdam edilebilirliğin biçimlendirici değişken rolü

K. Övgü OTLUOĞLU ÇAKMAK
Pages
25–41
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the data from 350 white-collar employees, the results demonstrate that perceived job insecurity and perceived employability are positively related to organizational mobility preferences.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Most employees are confronted with the increased levels of job insecurity in today’s working life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Based on the data from 350 white-collar employees, the results demonstrate that perceived job insecurity and perceived employability are positively related to organizational mobility preferences.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Perceived employability does not moderate the relationship between the perceived job insecurity and organizational mobility preferences.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Most employees are confronted with the increased levels of job insecurity in today’s working life. Organizational mobility and employability therefore have become salient to the employees. This study aims to examine the impact of perceived job insecurity on organizational mobility preferences. It is also aimed to investigate the moderating role of perceived employability on the relationship between perceived job insecurity and organizational mobility preferences. Based on the data from 350 white-collar employees, the results demonstrate that perceived job insecurity and perceived employability are positively related to organizational mobility preferences. Perceived employability does not moderate the relationship between the perceived job insecurity and organizational mobility preferences.

Özet

Günümüz çalışma koşullarında, çoğu işgören iş güvencesizliği ile karşı karşıyadır. Bu doğrultuda örgütler arası hareketlilik ve istihdam edilebilirlik olgularının ön plana çıktığı görülmektedir. Çalışmada algılanan iş güvencesizliğinin, örgütler arası hareketlilik tercihine etkisi incelenmiştir. Ayrıca algılanan istihdam edilebilirliğin, algılanan iş güvencesizliğinin örgütler arası hareketlilik tercihi üzerindeki biçimlendirici değişken rolü de test edilmiştir. 350 kişi üzerinde gerçekleştirilen araştırmada, hiyerarşik regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre algılanan iş güvencesizliği ve algılanan istihdam edilebilirliğin, örgütler arası hareketlilik tercihini pozitif yönde etkilediği saptanmıştır. Ancak algılanan istihdam edilebilirliğin, biçimlendirici değişken olarak rol oynamadığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKMAK, K. Ö. O. (2014). The effect of perceived job insecurity on organizational mobility preferences: The moderating role of perceived employability. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 25–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/291983

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ADAMSON, S., DOHERTY, J. N. ve VINEY, C. (1998),“The Meanings of Career Revisited: Implications for Theory and Practice”, British Journal of Management, 9-4, 251-259.
  2. ARTHUR, M. B. ve ROUSSEAU, D. M. (1996), “Introduction: The Boudaryless Career as a New Employment Principle”, The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era, Editörler: Michael B. Arthur, Denise M. Rousseau, Oxford University Press, New York, ss.3-20.
  3. BARUCH, Y. (2004), “Transforming Careers: From Linear to Multidirectional Career Paths: Organizational and Individual Perspectives”, Career Development International, 9-1, 58-73.
  4. BARUCH, Y. (2001), “Employability: A Substitute For Loyalty?”, Human Resource Development International, 4-4, 543-566.
  5. BARUCH, Y. ve PEIPERL, M. (2000), “Career Management Practices: An Empirical Survey and Implications”, Human Resource Management, 39-4, 347-366.
  6. BERNTSON, E., NASWALL, K. ve SVERKE, H. (2010), “The Moderating Role of Employability in the Association Between Job Insecurity and Exit, Voice, Loyalty and Neglect”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31-2, 215-230.
  7. BRISCOE, J. P., HALL, D. T. ve DEMUTH, R. L. F. (2006), “Protean and Boundaryless Careers: An Empirical Exploration”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69-1, 30-47.
  8. BURGARD, S. A., BRAND, J. E. ve HOUSE, J. S. (2009), “Perceived Job Insecurity and Worker Health in The United States”, Social Science and Medicine, 69-5, 777-785.
  9. BÜSSING, A. (1999), “Can Control at Work and Social Support Moderate Psychological Consequences of Job Insecurity? Results from a Quasi-experimental Study in The Steel Industry”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8-2, 219-242.
  10. CARBERY, R. ve GARAVAN, T. N. (2005), “Organizational Restructuring and Downsizing: Issues Related to Learning, Training, and Employability of Survivors”, Journal of European Industrial Training, 29-6, 488-508.
  11. CHENG, Y., CHEN, C. W., CHEN, C. J. ve CHIANG, T. L. (2005), "Job Insecurity and Its Association With Health Among Employees in The Taiwanese General Population." Social Science and Medicine, 61-1, 41-52.
  12. CHIRUMBOLO, A. ve ARENI, A. (2005), "The Influence of Job Insecurity on Job Performance and Absenteeism: The Moderating Effect of Work Attitudes." SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31-4, 65-71.
  13. CHIRUMBOLO, A. ve HELLGREN, J. (2003), “Individual and Organizational Consequences of Job Insecurity: A European Study”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24-2, 217-240.
  14. CLARKE, M. (2007), “Where