Journals / ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3

Getting into the inner circle:Professional managers in Turkish family business groups

İç halkaya dâhil olmak: Türkiye'deki büyük aile holdinglerinde profesyonel yöneticiler

Pages
521–551
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For educational backgrounds, we find no empirical support for separate hypotheses predicated on each of these perspectives.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we develop and empirically examine the idea of the inner circle within the context of Turkish family business groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The question we ask is "what work and educational experiences distinguish professional managers who get into the inner circle of the family leader?" Findings show that those who get into the inner circle are likely to have longer internal tenure and public sector experience relative to other highranking managers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For educational backgrounds, we find no empirical support for separate hypotheses predicated on each of these perspectives.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we develop and empirically examine the idea of the inner circle within the context of Turkish family business groups. The question we ask is "what work and educational experiences distinguish professional managers who get into the inner circle of the family leader?" Findings show that those who get into the inner circle are likely to have longer internal tenure and public sector experience relative to other highranking managers. There is only a weak relationship between international work experience and inner circle membership. Of the two institutional-theoretic perspectives that we consider, these findings lend greater support to the national version than the economic one. For educational backgrounds, we find no empirical support for separate hypotheses predicated on each of these perspectives.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, iç halka fikrini Türkiye'deki büyük aile holdingleri ortamına taşıyıp, görgül olarak inceliyoruz. Sorduğumuz soru, holdingin başında bulunan aile üyesinin etrafındaki iç halkaya dâhil olabilen profesyonel yöneticileri hangi iş ve eğitim deneyimlerinin ayırt ettiğidir. Bulgular, iç halkaya girenlerin uzun holding kıdemine ve devlet deneyimine sahip olmaları ihtimalinin diğer üst düzey yöneticilere kıyasla daha yüksek olduğunu göstermektedir. Yurtdışında çalışma deneyimi ile iç halka üyeliği arasında zayıf bir ilişki vardır. Bu sonuçlar, kuramsal temel olarak aldığımız iki kurumsalcı yaklaşımdan ulusal kurumsalcılığa, iktisadi olanına kıyasla daha fazla destek sağlamaktadır. Yöneticilerin eğitim geçmişine dair, yine bu iki yaklaşıma dayalı, hipotezlerimiz ise görgül destek görmemektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜSDİKEN, B., ŞENOL, F. N., ŞENOL, N. (2015). Getting into the inner circle:Professional managers in Turkish family business groups. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3, 521–551. https://ajindex.com/articles/291959

References (12)

  1. BIGGART, N. W. (1990), "Institutionalized Patrimonialism in Korean Business", Comparative Social Research, 12, 113-133.
  2. BUĞRA, A. (1994), State and Business in Modern Turkey: A Comparative Study. New York: State University of New York Press.
  3. CARNEY, M. (2004), "The Institutions of Industrial Restructuring in Southeast Asia", Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21 (1-2), 171-188.
  4. CARNEY, M. (2008), Asian Business Groups: Context, Governance and Performance. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. CARNEY, M., GEDAJLOVIC, E. R., HEUGENS, P. P. M. A. R., VAN ESSEN, M. ve VAN OOSTERHOUT, J. (2011), "Business Group Affiliation, Performance, Context, and Strategy: A Meta-analysis", Academy of Management Journal, 54 (3), 437-460.
  5. CARPENTER, M. A., GELETKANYCZ, M. A. ve SANDERS, W. G. (2004), "Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition", Journal of Management, 30 (6), 749-778.
  6. CHANG, J. J. ve Shin, H-H. (2006), "Governance System Effectiveness Following the Crisis: The case of Korean Business Group Headquarters", Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14 (2), 85-97.
  7. CHIZEMA, A. ve KIM, J. (2010), "Outside Directors on Korean Boards: Governance and Institutions", Journal of Management Studies, 47 (1), 109-129.
  8. CHUNG, C-N. ve LUO, X. (2008). "Human Agents, Contexts, and Institutional Change: The Decline of Family in the Leadership of Business Groups", Organization Science, 19 (1), 124- 142. ÇOLPAN, A. M. (2010), "Business Groups in Turkey", A. M. Çolpan, T. Hikino ve J. R. Lincoln (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 468- 525. ÇOLPAN, A. M. ve HIKINO, T. (2010), "Foundations of Business Groups: Towards An Integrated Framework", A. M. Çolpan, T. Hikino ve J. R. Lincoln (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 35-66.
  9. CUERVO-CAZURRA, A. ve DAU, L. A. (2009), "Promarket Reforms and Firm Profitability in Developing Countries", Academy of Management Journal, 52 (6), 1348-1368.
  10. FINKELSTEIN, S. (1992), "Power In Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation", Academy of Management Journal, 35 (3), 505-538.
  11. FINKELSTEIN, S., HAMBRICK, D. C. ve CANNELLA, A. A. (2009), Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams and Boards, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. GÖKŞEN, N. S. (2007), "Makro-kurumsal Bakış Açısı: Bir Değerlendirme", S. Sargut ve Ş. Özen (Ed.), Örgüt Kuramları, Ankara: İmg