SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3

Divergent behaviors of actors under common institutional expectations: University-, departmental-, and individual-level predictors of scientific publication productivity of academics

Aynı kurumsal beklentilere tabi aktörlerin farklılaşan davranışları: Öğretim üyelerinin bilimsel yayın üretkenliklerinin üniversite, bölüm ve birey düzeyindeki yordayıcıları

CETIN ONDER
Selin Eser ERDİL
Pages
481–519
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings reveal that most academicians fail to satisfy institutional demands and that publication productivity varies considerably depending on university-, departmental-, or individual- level factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Academic research is increasingly governed by external regulation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study examines scientific publication productivity of academicians in management departments of Turkish universities between 2007 and 2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings reveal that most academicians fail to satisfy institutional demands and that publication productivity varies considerably depending on university-, departmental-, or individual- level factors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Academic research is increasingly governed by external regulation. Some of the core components of these regulations relate to scientific publication productivity of academicians. This study examines scientific publication productivity of academicians in management departments of Turkish universities between 2007 and 2011. Findings reveal that most academicians fail to satisfy institutional demands and that publication productivity varies considerably depending on university-, departmental-, or individual- level factors. We discuss conceptual and administrative implications of these findings.

Özet

Akademik araştırma giderek artan ölçüde dışsal düzenlemelerle yönetilir hale gelmektedir. Bu düzenlemelerin en önemli unsurlarından bazıları akademisyenlerin bilimsel yayın üretkenliklerinin artırılmasına ilişkindir. Bu çalışmada, Türk üniversitelerinin işletme bölümlerindeki öğretim üyelerinin 2007 ve 2011 yılları arasındaki bilimsel yayın üretkenliklerinin öncülleri görgül olarak incelenmektedir. Bulgular, öğretim üyelerinin ancak bir kısmının düzenlemelerde öngörülen türde bilimsel yayın yaptığını; üretkenliklerinin de üniversite, bölüm veya birey düzeyindeki bazı faktörlere bağlı olarak önemli ölçüde farklılaştığını göstermektedir. Çalışmada, söz konusu bulguların kavramsal ve yönetimsel sonuçları tartışılmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

ONDER, C., ERDİL, S. E. (2015). Divergent behaviors of actors under common institutional expectations: University-, departmental-, and individual-level predictors of scientific publication productivity of academics. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3, 481–519. https://ajindex.com/articles/291958

References (17)

  1. ADAM, D. (2002), "Citation Analysis: The Counting House", Nature, 415(6873), 726-729.
  2. ALATAS, S. F. (2003), "Academic Dependency and the Global Division of Labour in the Social Sciences", Current Sociology, 51(6), 599-613.
  3. ANDERSON, G. (2006), "Carving out Time and Space in the Managerial University", Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(5), 578-592.
  4. BALCI, M. (2011), "Yüksek Sayıda Makalelerin Sırrı", Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik, 255, 10-11.
  5. BANSAL, P. ve CLELLAND, I. (2004), "Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment", Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93-103.
  6. BEALL, J. (2012), "Predatory Publishers are Corrupting Open Access", Nature, 489, 179. BECKERT, J. (2010), "Institutional Isomorphism Revisited: Convergence and Divergence in Institutional Change", Sociological Theory, 28(2), 150-166.
  7. BERLEMANN, M. ve HAUCAP, J. (2015), "Which Factors Drive the Decision to Opt out of Individual Research Rankings? An Empirical Study of Academic Resistance to Change", Research Policy, 44(5), 1108-1115.
  8. BROMLEY, P. ve WALTER, W. (2012), "From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World", Academy of Management Annals, 6, 1-48.
  9. BUTLER, L. (2003), "Modifying Publishing Practices in Response to Funding Formulas", Research Evaluation, 12(1), 39-46.
  10. CAMERON, A. C. ve PRAVIN K. T. (1998),
  11. Regression Analysis of Count Data, Cambridge University Press,
  12. Cambridge. CHANDLER, J., BARRY, J. ve CLARK, H. (2002), "Stressing Academe: The Wear and Tear of the New Public Management", Human Relations, 55(9), 1051-1069.
  13. CLEMENS, E. S. ve COOK, J. M. (1999), "Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change", Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 441-466.
  14. DIMAGGIO, P. D. ve POWELL, W. W. (1983), "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields", American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
  15. DRORI, G. S. ve MEYER, J. W. (2006), "Global Scientization: An Environment for Expanded Organization", Globalization and Organization, World Society and Organizational Change, Editörler: DRORI, G.S., MEYER, J. W. ve HWANG, H., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 50-68.
  16. DÜNDAR, H. ve LEWIS, D. R. (1998), "Determinants of Research Productivity in Higher Education", Research in Higher Education, 39(6), 607-631.
  17. ESPELAND, W. N. ve SAUDER, M. (2007), "Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds", American Journ