SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

The experimental and numerical analysis of turbulent flow pressure drop of helical square duct

Kare kesitli helisel kanalda türbülanslı akışta basınç düşüşünün deneysel ve nümerik analizi

OKYAR KAYA
Pages
283–289
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The experimental and numerical results were compared and validated with the results in the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the pressure drop of helical square duct which has 8x8 mm dimension, a pitch of b =12 mm was investigated both experimentally and numerically with the similar experimental boundary conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result it was understood that the maximum difference between numerical and experimental data is about 5 %.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The experimental and numerical results were compared and validated with the results in the literature.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the pressure drop of helical square duct which has 8x8 mm dimension, a pitch of b =12 mm was investigated both experimentally and numerically with the similar experimental boundary conditions. SIMPLE algorithm, PRESTO pressure-velocity interpolation option, RNG k-$\epsilon$ turbulent model and Gauss Siedel iteration method were used in numerical computations which were done by FLUENT® programme. As a result it was understood that the maximum difference between numerical and experimental data is about 5 %. The experimental and numerical results were compared and validated with the results in the literature.

Özet

Bu çalışmada 8x8 mm kare kesitli, 12 mm hatveli helisel kanalda basınç düşüşü deneysel olarak tespit edilerek benzer sınır şartlarında bilgisayarda nümerik çözüm yapılmıştır. Nümerik çözüm FLUENT® programı ile SIMPLE çözüm algoritması, PRESTO basınç-hız enterpolasyon yöntemi, RNG k-$\epsilon$ türbülans modeli ve Gauss Siedel iterasyon metodu kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Nümerik ve deneysel veriler arasında en fazla % 5 gibi bir fark vardır. Deneysel ve nümerik sonuçlar literatürde yayınlanmış çözümler ile karşılaştırılarak valide edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, O. (2004). The experimental and numerical analysis of turbulent flow pressure drop of helical square duct. Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 283–289. https://ajindex.com/articles/291172

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Anonymous, 1998. Fluent® User's Guide. Fluent Incorporated Centerra Resource Park, Lebanon. Bolinder, C.J. 1995. The Effect of Torsion on the Bifurcation Structure of Laminar Flow in a Helical Square Duct Transections of the ASME.117, 242-248.
  2. Butuzow, A.I., Bezrodnyy, M.K., Pustovit, M.M:, 1975. Hydroulic Resistance and Heat Transfer in Forced Flow in Rectangular Coiled Tubes, Heat Transfer Sov. Res. 7-4, 84-88.
  3. Ito, H. 1959. Friction Factors for Turbulent Flow in Curved Pipes. J. Basic Eng., Vol. 81, pp. 123-134.
  4. Kadambi, V. 1983. Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop in a Helically Coiled Rectangular Duct, ASME Paper, No 83-WA/HT-1 Kaya, O. 2002. Plastik Boru Ekstrüder Kalibrelerinde Isı Transferinin İyileştirilmesi, Doktora Tezi. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi,
  5. İstanbul.
  6. Kubair, V., Varrier, C.B.S. 1961. Pressure Drop for Liquid Flow in Helical Coils, Trans. Indian Inst Chem. Eng. 14,93-97.
  7. Li, L. J., Lin, C. X., Ebadian, M. A. 1998. Turbulent Mixed Convective Heat Transfer in the Entrance Region of a Curved Pipe with Uniform Wall Temperature, Int. J. Heat and Mass Transfer. (41), 3793-3805.
  8. Lin, C. X., Zhang, P., Ebadian, M. A. 1997. Laminar Forced Convection in the Entrance Region of Helical Pipes, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 40 (14), 3293-3304.
  9. Mishra, P., Grupta, S. N. 1979.
  10. Momentum Transfer in Curved Pipes, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 18,130-142.
  11. Mori, Y., Nakayama, W. 1965. Study on Forced Convective Heat Transfer in Curved Pipes, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 8, 67-82.
  12. Patankar, S.V., Pratap, V. S., Spalding, D.B. 1974. Prediction of Laminar Flow and Heat Transfer in Helically Coiled Pipes, J. Fluid Mech. 62, 539-551.
  13. Srinivasan, P. S., Nandapurkar, S. S., Holland, F. A. 1968. Pressure Drop and Heat Transfer in Coils, The Chem. Eng. (London). 218, 113-119.
  14. Thangam, S., Hur, N. 1990. Laminar Secondary Flows in Curved Rectangular Ducts, Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 217,421-440
  15. Thomson, D. L., Bayazıtoğlu, Y., Meade, A. J. 2001. Series Solution of Low Dean and Germano Number Flows in Helical Rectangular Ducts, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 40, 937-948
  16. Yang, G., Gong, F., Ebadian, M. A. 1995. Laminar Forced Convection in a Helicoidal Pipe with Finite Pitch, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 38 (5), 853-862.
  17. Yakhot, V., Orzag, S.A. 1986. Renormalization Group Analysis of Turbulance, J. Of Scientific Computing 1:3.