Journals / Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi / 2017 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Monitoring My Multiple Sclerosis Scale

Multipl Skleroz İzlem Ölçeği Türkçe Formu’nun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Pages
131–138
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 instrument was used to determine concurrent validity and the Expanded Disability Status Scale, HospitalAnxiety and Depression Scale, and Mini Mental State Examination were used for further determination of the construct validity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: This research was conducted to adapt the Monitoring My Multiple Sclerosis (MMMS) scale, which is a scale used for selfevaluation by multiple sclerosis (MS) patients of their own health and quality of life, to Turkish and to determine the psychometric properties of the scale.Methods: The methodological research was conducted in the outpatient MS clinic of a university hospital between January and September 2013.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample in this study consisted of 140 patients aged above 18 who had a diagnosis of definite MS.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 instrument was used to determine concurrent validity and the Expanded Disability Status Scale, HospitalAnxiety and Depression Scale, and Mini Mental State Examination were used for further determination of the construct validity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: This research was conducted to adapt the Monitoring My Multiple Sclerosis (MMMS) scale, which is a scale used for selfevaluation by multiple sclerosis (MS) patients of their own health and quality of life, to Turkish and to determine the psychometric properties of the scale.Methods: The methodological research was conducted in the outpatient MS clinic of a university hospital between January and September 2013. The sample in this study consisted of 140 patients aged above 18 who had a diagnosis of definite MS. Patients who experienced attacks in the previous month or had any serious medical problems other than MS were not included in the group. The linguistic validity of MMMS was tested by a backward–forward translation method and an expert panel. Reliability analysis was performed using test–retest correlations, item–total correlations, and internal consistency analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis and concurrent validity were used to determine the construct validity. The Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 instrument was used to determine concurrent validity and the Expanded Disability Status Scale, HospitalAnxiety and Depression Scale, and Mini Mental State Examination were used for further determination of the construct validity.

Özet

Amaç: Bu araştırma, multipl sklerozlu hastaların sağlık algılarını ve yaşam kalitelerini kendi kendilerine değerlendirmelerinde kullanılan "Multipl Skleroz İzlem Ölçeği"ni (Monitoring My Multiple Sclerosis, MMMS) Türkçe'ye uyarlamak ve psikometrik özelliklerini incelemek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

DÜNYA, C. P., TÜLEK, Z., KÜRTÜNCÜ, M., ERAKSOY, M. (2017). Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Monitoring My Multiple Sclerosis Scale. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2, 131–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/291024

References (13)

  1. Albuquerquea C, Geraldob A, Martinsa R, Ribeiro O. Quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis: Clinical and psychosocial determinants. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2015
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Tülek Z. Düzenli sağlık kontrolüne alınan multipl sklerozlu hastalarda yaşam kalitesinin belirlenmesi (Determination of Quality of Life İn Multiple Sclerosis Patients), İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Hemşirelik Doktora Tezi (Istanbul University Institute of Health Sciences, Doctoral Thesis), 2006, Istanbul. 3. Gulick EE, Namey M, Halper J. Monitoring my multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care 2011
  3. [CrossRef] 4. Rotstein Z, Hazan R, Barak Y, Achiron A. Perspectives in multiple sclerosis health care: special focus on the costs of multiple sclerosis. Autoimmün Rev 2006
  4. [CrossRef] 5. Benito-Leon J. Multiple sclerosis: Is the prevalence rising and if so why? Neuroepidemiology 2011
  5. [CrossRef] 6. Heydarpour P, Khoshkish S, Abtahi S, Moradi-Lakeh M, Sahraian MA. Multiple Sclerosis Epidemiology in Middle East and North Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neuroepidemiology 2015
  6. [CrossRef] 7. Boru UT, Alp R, Sur H, Gül L. Prevalence of multiple sclerosis: door-to-door survey in Maltepe, Istanbul, Turkey. Neuroepidemiology 2006
  7. [CrossRef] 8. Chopra P, Herrman H, Kennedy G. Comparison of disability and quality of life measures in patients with long-term psychotic disorders and patients with multiple sclerosis: an application of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II and WHO Quality of Life-BREF. Int J Rehabil Res 2008
  8. [CrossRef] 9. Dilorenzo TA, Halper J, Picone MA. Quality of life in MS: does aging enhance perceptions of mental health? Disabil Rehabil 2009
  9. [CrossRef] 10. Files DK, Jausurawong T, Katrajian R, Danoff R. Multiple sclerosis. Prim Care 2015
  10. [CrossRef] 11. Akkus Y, Akdemir N. Improving the quality of life for multiple sclerosis patients using the nurse-based home visiting model. Scand J Caring Sci 2012
  11. [CrossRef] 12. Strickland K, Baguley F. The role of the community nurse in care provision for people with multiple sclerosis. Br J Community Nurs 2015
  12. [CrossRef] 13. Mattarozzi K, Casini F, Baldin E, Baldini M, Lugaresi A, Milani P, Pietrolongo E, Gajofatto A, Leone M, Riise T, Vignatelli L, D’Alessandro R
  13. G.E.Ro.N.I.Mu.S.Group. Assessing subjective quality of life domains after multiple sclerosis diagnosis disc