SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Novitas-Royal / 2011 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Introductıon: Conversatıon Analysıs in Applıed Lınguıstıcs

Olcay SERT
Paul SEEDHOUSE
Pages
1–14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We believe that the publication of such a special journal issue is timely, since Conversation Analysis has been one of the most influential methodologies in recent Applied Linguistic research, as can be seen by the growing number of publications appearing in various journals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This short, introductory paper presents an up-to-date account of works within the field of Applied Linguistics which have been influenced by a Conversation Analytic paradigm.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The article reviews recent studies in classroom interaction, materials development, proficiency assessment and language teacher education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We believe that the publication of such a special journal issue is timely, since Conversation Analysis has been one of the most influential methodologies in recent Applied Linguistic research, as can be seen by the growing number of publications appearing in various journals.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This short, introductory paper presents an up-to-date account of works within the field of Applied Linguistics which have been influenced by a Conversation Analytic paradigm. The article reviews recent studies in classroom interaction, materials development, proficiency assessment and language teacher education. We believe that the publication of such a special journal issue is timely, since Conversation Analysis has been one of the most influential methodologies in recent Applied Linguistic research, as can be seen by the growing number of publications appearing in various journals.

Özet

Bu kısa giriş makalesi Konuşma Çözümlemesi yaklaşımından etkilenen Uygulamalı Dilbilim alanındaki çalışmalara dair güncel bir değerlendirme sunmaktadır. Çalışmamız sınıf etkileşimi, materyal geliştirme, dil yeterliliği değerlendirmesi ve yabancı dil öğretmeni yetiştirme gibi çeşitli alanlarda yapılan güncel çalışmaları taramaktadır. İnanıyoruz ki bu özel sayının yayınlanması, Konuşma Çözümlemesinin Uygulamalı Dilbilimde son zamanlarda kullanılan en etkili yöntemlerden biri olması bakımından, zaman açısından çok uygundur; ki bu çeşitli dergilerde sürekli artan bu alandaki makale sayısından anlaşılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SERT, O., SEEDHOUSE, P. (2011). Introductıon: Conversatıon Analysıs in Applıed Lınguıstıcs. Novitas-Royal, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/291014

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Bernsten, S. G. (2002). Using Conversation Analysis to evaluate pre-sequences in invitation, offer and request dialogues in ESL textbooks. University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign. Bowles, H. (2006). Bridging the gap between conversation analysis and ESP- an applied study of the opening sequences of NS and NNS service telephone calls. English for Specific Purposes. 25, 332-357.
  2. Bowles, H. (2011). The contribution of CA to the study of literary dialogue. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language). 5(1), 161-168. Retrieved from http://www.novitasroyal.org/Vol_5_1/bowles.pdf
  3. Brown, A. (2003). Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency. Language Testing, 20(1), 1-25.
  4. Brown, T.P. and Lewis, M. (2003). An ESP project: Analysis of an authentic workplace conversation. English for Specific Purposes. 22, 93-98.
  5. Brouwer, C. (2003). Word searches in NNS-NS interaction: Opportunities for language learning? The Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 534-545.
  6. Brouwer, C. E. and Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics. 1(1), 30-47.
  7. Carroll, D. (2005). Learning through interactive talk: A school-based mentor teacher study group as a context for professional learning. Teacher and Teacher Education. 21, 457- 473. Cekaite, A. (2007). A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. The Modern Language Journal. 91(1), 45-62.
  8. Christodoulidou, M. (2011). Lexical markers within the university lecture. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language). 5(1), 143-160. Retrieved from http://www.novitasroyal.org/Vol_5_1/chistodoulidou.pdf
  9. Cook, V. (2007). The nature of the L2 user. In Roberts, L., Gurel, A., Tatar, S. and Marti, L. (eds). EUROSLA Yearbook. 7, 205-20.
  10. Durus, N., Ludwig, M., Sert, O., Steinkraus, R. and Ziegler, G. (2010). Turn-initials as learners’ participation devices: “turning out” in ELF discourse. New Insights into the Study of Conversation: Applications to the Language Classroom. May 26-28, 2010.
  11. University of Granada, Granada, Spain. Egbert, M. (1998). Miscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-year German students: comparison with natural conversation. In R. Young & A. He (Eds.), Talking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency (pp. 147-69). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Evnitskaya, N. and Morton, T. (2011). Knowledge construction, meaning-making and interaction in CLIL science classroom communities of prac