SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Novitas-Royal / 2016 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

ÖZ-BELİRLEME KURAMI VE DAY VE BAMFORD'IN KAPSAMLI OKUMA HAKKINDAKİ İLKELER

SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY AND DAY AND BAMFORD'S PRINCIPLES FOR EXTENSIVE READING

Gönül TÜRKDOĞAN
John SIVELL
Pages
159–179
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Implications are proposed for pre-service teacher education, institutional planning, and in-service professional development

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Day and Bamford's ten principles for promoting second-language (L2) extensive reading (ER) have been commended for their highly applicable practicality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Day and Bamford's ten recommendations incorporate features that can be viewed as exemplifying one or more of the three SDT components - competence, autonomy, and relatedness - which, SDT argues, should all be present in an ideally motivational environment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Implications are proposed for pre-service teacher education, institutional planning, and in-service professional development
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Day and Bamford's ten principles for promoting second-language (L2) extensive reading (ER) have been commended for their highly applicable practicality. However, for various reasons, assuring successful ER instruction can remain a challenging task. This surprising contrast may in part be clarified by examining the relationship between Day and Bamford's recommendations and the factors highlighted in the Self-Determination Theory (SDT) of motivation. Day and Bamford's ten recommendations incorporate features that can be viewed as exemplifying one or more of the three SDT components - competence, autonomy, and relatedness - which, SDT argues, should all be present in an ideally motivational environment. However, a mixed-method study of 9 adult ESL instructors (Likert scale questionnaires, plus follow-up interviews) suggested that selective adherence to some but not all dimensions of Day and Bamford's guidance may allow SDT constituents to be unwittingly underrepresented. We therefore advise that Day and Bamford's principles for ER instruction should be explicitly associated with the SDT framework, in order to draw practitioners' attention as directly as possible to the full range of motivational resources available. Implications are proposed for pre-service teacher education, institutional planning, and in-service professional development

Özet

İkinci dilde kapsamlı okumayı geliştirmek için Day ve Bamford tarafından belirlenen on ilke özellikle uygulanabilirlikleri açısından önemli bulunmuştur fakat birçok sebepten dolayı başarılı bir kapsamlı okuma yönergesi verebilmenin zorlukları da bilinmektedir. Day ve Bamford'ın önerileri ile motivasyonun Öz-Belirleme Kuramında altı çizilen faktörler arasındaki ilişki incelenerek açıklığa kavuşturulabilir. Day ve Bamford tarafından belirlenen on öneri, Öz-Belirleme Kuramının üç ögesinden - yeterlik, özerklik ve ilintililik -, ki Öz-Belirleme Kuramı bunların hepsinin motive edici ideal bir ortamda bulunması gerektiğini ileri sürmektedir, bir veya daha fazlasını örneklendiren özellikleri içermektedir. Ancak, 9 yetişkin İkinci Dil Olarak İngilizce (ESL) okutmanının katılımıyla gerçekleştirilen bu karma-yöntemli çalışmanın sonuçları Day ve Bamford rehberliğinin tüm katmanlarını değil de bir kısmını seçici olarak takip etmenin mümkün olduğunu göstermektedir. Uygulayıcıların dikkatini motivasyonla ilgili kaynakların tümüne dikkat çekmek için, kapsamlı okuma yönergeleriyle ilgili Day ve Bamford tarafından belirlenen ilkelerin Öz-Belirleme Kuramı ile ilişkilendirilmesini öneriyoruz. Aday öğretmen eğitimi, kurumsal planlama ve hizmet içi mesleki gelişim için öneriler de bu makalenin içeriğinde sunulmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKDOĞAN, G., SIVELL, J. (2022). ÖZ-BELİRLEME KURAMI VE DAY VE BAMFORD'IN KAPSAMLI OKUMA HAKKINDAKİ İLKELER. Novitas-Royal, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 159–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/584568

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Al-Homoud, F., & Schmitt, N. (2009). Extensive reading in a challenging environment: A comparison of extensive and intensive approaches in Saudi Arabia. Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 383-401.
  2. Asraf, M. R., & Ahmad, S. I. (2003). Promoting English language development and the reading habit among students in rural schools through the guided extensive reading program. Reading in a Foreign Language 15(2), 83-102.
  3. Bamford, J. & Day, J. (1997). Extensive reading: What is it? Why bother? The Language Teacher, 21(5). Retrieved from http://jalt- publications.org/old_tlt/files/97/may/extensive.html Bell, T. (2001). Extensive reading: Speed and comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 1(1), n.p. Brooks, F. C., & Young, L. S. (2011). Are choice-making opportunities needed in the classroom? Using self-determination theory to consider motivation and learner empowerment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 48-59.
  4. Camiciottoli, B. (2001). Extensive reading in English: habits and attitudes of a group of Italian university EFL students. Journal of Research in Reading, 24(2), 135-153.
  5. Cho, K., & Krashen, S. (1994). Acquisition of vocabulary from the Sweet Valley Kids series: Adult ESL acquisition. Journal of Reading, 37, 662-667.
  6. Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (1997). Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225-299.
  7. Day, R. (2015). Extending extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(2), 294-301.
  8. Day, R & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Day, R. & Bamford, J. (2002). Top ten principles for teaching extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(2), 136-141.
  10. Deci, E. L, & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
  12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49 (3), 182-185. de Morgado, N. F. (2009). Extensive reading: Students' performance and perception. The Reading Matrix, 9(1), 31-43.
  13. Edy, S. (2015). The effectiveness of extensive reading on students' reading comprehension achievement as observed from students' motivation. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 2