Journals / Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online) / 2018 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1

Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the gugging swallowing screen test in the early period of hemispheric stroke

Pages
6–13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: T-GUSS has good internal consistency and very good reliability between raters, as well as good correlation with FEES evaluation regarding the detection of aspiration risk in the early period of stroke in Turkish patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) test is a bedside screening test for the assessment of all phases of swallow- ing in acute-period stroke.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The scale was administered to 113 patients within the early periods of stroke (within 30 days after stroke).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: T-GUSS has good internal consistency and very good reliability between raters, as well as good correlation with FEES evaluation regarding the detection of aspiration risk in the early period of stroke in Turkish patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) test is a bedside screening test for the assessment of all phases of swallow- ing in acute-period stroke. The present study aimed to evaluate whether GUSS was effective for the detection of dysphagia in the early period after stroke, as well as to conduct Turkish translation, and validity and reliability studies. Methods: The scale was administered to 113 patients within the early periods of stroke (within 30 days after stroke). The proce- dures were scored by two blinded independent expert observers. Cronbach’s alpha and item-to-total correlations were used to assess internal consistency. Inter-rater reliability studies were also conducted. Endoscopic evaluations were performed within the first 4 hours following the application of the screening tests. The fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) method was used to describe the validity of measures. Results: The mean time since the stroke was 14.34±5.23 days. Internal consistency was found to be good with Cronbach’s α values between 0.844 and 0.846. The intraclass correlation coefficient scores indicated excellent inter-rater reliability with scores ranging from 0.881 to 1.000. A strong negative correlation was found between FEES stage and the total T-GUSS scores of the raters (r=-0.547 p<0.001; r=-0.515, p=0.001, respectively). Conclusion: T-GUSS has good internal consistency and very good reliability between raters, as well as good correlation with FEES evaluation regarding the detection of aspiration risk in the early period of stroke in Turkish patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

UMAY, E. K., GÜRÇAY, E., BAHÇECİ, K., ÖZTÜRK, E., YILMAZ, V., GÜNDOĞDU, İ., CEYLAN, T., EREN, Y., ÇAKCI, A. (2018). Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the gugging swallowing screen test in the early period of hemispheric stroke. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online), Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1, 6–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/290605

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Falsetti P, Acciai C, Palilla R, et al. Oropharyngeal dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and clinical predictors in patients admitted to a neurorehabilitation unit. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 18: 329-335. [CrossRef ] Cohen DL, Roffe C, Beavan J, et al. Post-stroke dysphagia: A review and design considerations for future trials. Int J Stroke 2016; 11: 399-411. [CrossRef ] Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, et al. Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke 2005; 36: 2756-2763. [CrossRef ] Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013; 44: 870-947. [CrossRef ] Hebert D, Lindsay MP, McIntyre A, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. Int J Stroke 2016; 11: 459-484. [CrossRef ] Donovan NJ, Daniels SK, Edmiaston J, et al. Dysphagia screening: state of the art: invitational conference proceeding from the State-of-the-Art Nursing Symposium, International Stroke Conference 2012. Stroke 2013; 44: e24-31. [CrossRef ] Poorjavad M, Jalaie S. Systemic review on highly qualified screening tests for swallowing disorders following stroke: Validity and reliability issues. J Res Med Sci 2014; 19: 776-785.
  2. Mann G, Hankey GJ, Cameron D. Swallowing disorders following acute stroke: prevalence and diagnostic accuracy. Cerebrovasc Dis 2000; 10: 380-386. [CrossRef ] Teasell R, Foley N, Salter K, et al. Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation: executive summary, 12th edition. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009; 16:463-488. [CrossRef ] Daniels SK, Anderson JA, Willson PC. Valid items for screening dysphagia risk in patients with stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2012; 43: 892-897. [CrossRef ] Oh JC, Park JH, Jung MY, et al. Relationship between Quantified Instrumental Swallowing Examination and Comprehensive Clinical Swallowing Examination. Occup Ther Int 2016; 23: 3-10. [CrossRef ] Trapl M, Enderle P, Nowotny M, et al. Dysphagia bedside screening for acute-stroke patients: the Gugging Swallowing Screen. Stroke 2007; 38: 2948-2952. [CrossRef ] Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25: 3186-3191. [CrossRef ] Dziewas R, Warnecke T, Olenberg S, et al. Towards a basic endoscopic assess