Journals / Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online) / 2018 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4

Investigation of the effects of continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with migraine

Pages
177–182
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings indicate impairment of glutamatergic circuits to be a major culprit in the pathogenesis of migraine.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) allows the non-invasive investigation of synaptic plasticity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study included 17 patients with migraine without aura and 18 healthy volunteers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings indicate impairment of glutamatergic circuits to be a major culprit in the pathogenesis of migraine.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Abstract Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) allows the non-invasive investigation of synaptic plasticity. Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) is a modified form of rTMS that induces synaptic plasticity. Our objective was to evaluate cortical excitability using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (ppTMS) before and after continuous TBS (cTBS) in healthy controls and patients with migraine. Methods: The study included 17 patients with migraine without aura and 18 healthy volunteers. Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes, motor threshold (MT), intracortical inhibition (ICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and cortical silent period (CSP) were assessed using a figure-of-eight–shaped coil with a magnetic stimulator. cTBS was applied following baseline assessments; the results of ICI, ICF, and CSP at baseline and post-cTBS were compared between patients with migraine and healthy controls. Results: There were no differences in baseline MT, CSP, and ICI parameters between patients with migraine and healthy controls; ICF was not achieved and a decrease in MEP amplitudes (80±52%) was found in most patients with migraine. After cTBS, ICF was not achieved in most subjects in both groups and a significant TIME effect (F=9.124 p=0.005) in addition to TIME x GROUP interaction (F=7.129 p=0.012) was noted, indicating a more significant decrease in the controls than in patients with migraine. Conclusion: Baseline ICF was not achieved in patients with migraine, and after cTBS, ICF was not achieved in either group; the inhibitory effect of cTBS was absent in patients with migraine. These findings indicate impairment of glutamatergic circuits to be a major culprit in the pathogenesis of migraine.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATMACA, M. Ç., KAVAKLIOĞLU, B. Ç., ALDAN, M. A., Argun, T., ATMACA, M. M., GÜL, G., SOYSAL, A. (2018). Investigation of the effects of continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with migraine. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online), Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4, 177–182. https://ajindex.com/articles/290559

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Rossini PM, Rossi S. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: diagnostic, therapeutic, and research potential. Neurology 2007
  2. [CrossRef] Khedr EM, Ahmed MA, Mohamed KA. Motor and visual cortical excitability in migraineurs patients with or without aura: transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurophysiol Clin 2006
  3. [CrossRef] van der Kamp W, Maassen VanDenBrink A, Ferrari MD, van Dijk JG. Interictal cortical hyperexcitability in migraine patients demonstrated with transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurol Sci 1996
  4. [CrossRef] Maertens de Noordhout A, Pepin JL, Schoenen J, Delwaide PJ. Percutaneous magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in migraine. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992
  5. [CrossRef] Afra J, Mascia A, Gerard P, Maertens de Noordhout A, Schoenen J. Interictal cortical excitability in migraine: a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor and visual cortices. Ann Neurol 1998
  6. [CrossRef] van der Kamp W, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Ferrari MD, van Dijk JG. Interictal cortical excitability to magnetic stimulation in familial hemiplegic migraine. Neurology 1997
  7. [CrossRef] Bettucci D, Cantello R, Gianelli M, Naldi P, Mutani R. Menstrual migraine without aura: cortical excitability to magnetic stimulation. Headache 1992
  8. [CrossRef] Gunaydin S, Soysal A, Atay T, Arpaci B. Motor and occipital cortex excitability in migraine patients. Can J Neurol Sci 2006
  9. [CrossRef] Werhahn KJ, Wiseman K, Herzog J, Förderreuther S, Dichgans M, Straube A. Motor cortex excitability in patients with migraine with aura and hemiplegic migraine. Cephalalgia 2000
  10. [CrossRef] Bohotin V, Fumal A, Vandenheede M, Bohotin C, Schoenen J. Excitability of visual V1-V2 and motor cortices to single transcranial magnetic stimuli in migraine: a reappraisal using a figure-of-eight coil. Cephalalgia 2003
  11. [CrossRef] Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer. Neuron 2007
  12. [CrossRef] Siniatchkin M, Kroner-Herwig B, Kocabiyik E, Rothenberger A. Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in migraine--a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Headache 2007
  13. [CrossRef] Brighina F, Giglia G, Scalia S, Francolini M, Palermo A, Fierro B. Facilitatory effects of 1 Hz rTMS in motor cortex of patients affected by migraine with aura. Exp Brain Res 2005
  14. [CrossRef] Brighina F, Palermo A, Daniele O, Aloisio A, Fierro B. H