Journals / Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

USING CLUSTER ANALYSIS METHODS FOR MULTIVARIATE MAPPING

ÇOK DEĞİŞKENLİ HARİTALAMA İÇİN KÜMELEME YÖNTEMLERİNİN KULLANILMASI

Pages
415–429
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The methods were compared using the maps produced with these methods and effectiveness of these maps in risk management and planning were discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Multivariate mapping is the visual exploration of spatial objects with multiple attributes using a map.
📊
Key Findings & Data:More than one attribute can be visually explored and symbolized using numerous statistical classification systems or data reduction techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The methods were compared using the maps produced with these methods and effectiveness of these maps in risk management and planning were discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çok değişkenli haritalama · veri madenciliği · kümeleme analizi

Abstract

Multivariate mapping is the visual exploration of spatial objects with multiple attributes using a map. More than one attribute can be visually explored and symbolized using numerous statistical classification systems or data reduction techniques. In this sense, clustering analysis methods can be used for multivariate mapping. In this study, among clustering analysis methods, k-means method, k-medoids method and Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering method were selected. For this purpose, multivariate maps created from traffic accident data of two different years in Turkey were used. The methods were compared using the maps produced with these methods and effectiveness of these maps in risk management and planning were discussed.

Özet

Çok değişkenli haritalama mekânsal objelere ait birden çok özelliğin harita kullanılarak görsel sunumudur. Çeşitli veri hazırlama ve istatistiksel sınıflandırma teknikleri kullanılarak mekânsal objelere ait birden çok özellik görsel olarak incelenebilir ve kartografik işaretlerle gösterilebilir. Bu kapsamda kümeleme analizi yöntemleri de çok değişkenli haritalama için kullanılabilir. Bu çalışmada kümeleme analiz yöntemlerinden k-ortalama yöntemi, k-temsilci yöntemi ve Birleştirici Hiyerarşik Kümeleme yöntemi ele alınmıştır. Bu yöntemlerle Türkiye’deki üç ayrı yıla ait trafik kaza verileri kullanılarak oluşturulan sınıflar ve üretilen çok değişkenli haritalar kullanılarak bu yöntemlerin karşılaştırılması yapılmış, bu yöntemlerle üretilen haritaların risk yönetimi ve planlamada kullanılabilirliği üzerinde durulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

SELVİ, H. Z., ÇAĞLAR, B. (2017). USING CLUSTER ANALYSIS METHODS FOR MULTIVARIATE MAPPING. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 415–429. https://ajindex.com/articles/290490

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. BUCKLEY, A., Multivariate Mapping. In K. KEMP (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Geographic Information Science (pp. 300-303), 2008
  2. SLOCUM, T.A., MCMASTER,,R.B., KESSLER, F.C., HOWARD, H.H.,Thematic Cartography and Geovisualization, Pearson Education Inc. Third Edition, USA, 2009
  3. BREWER, C.A., Color Use Guidelines for Mapping and Visualization, In A.M. MACEACHREN D.R.F TAYLOR (Eds.), Visualization in Modern Cartography (pp. 123-147),1994
  4. METTERNICHT, G., VESTOTT J., “Trivariate Spectral Encoding: A Prototype System for Automated Selection of Colours for Soil Maps Based on Soil Textural Composition”, Proceedings of the 21st International Cartographic Conference, Durban, CD, 2003
  5. BYRON, J. R., “Spectral Encoding of Soil Texture: A New Visualization Method”, GIS/LIS Proceedings, Phoenix, Airz., 125-132, 1994
  6. INTERRANTE, V., “Harnessing Natural Textures for Multivariate Visualization”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 20, 6-11, 2000
  7. JENKS, G. F., “Pointillism as a Cartographic Technique”, The Professional Geographer, 5, 4-6, 1953
  8. COX, D.J., “The Art of Scientific Visualization. Academic Computing”, 4, 20-22, 32-34, 36-38,1990
  9. ELLSON, R., “Visualization at Work”, Academic Computing, 4, 6, 26-28,54-56, 1990
  10. DORLING, D., “The Visualization Of Local Urban Change Across Britain”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 22, 269 -290, 1995
  11. GRINSTEIN, G., SIEG, J.C.J., SMITH, S., WILLIAMS M.G., “Visualization for Knowledge Discovery”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 7, 637-648, 1992
  12. HEALEY, C.G., ENNS, J.T., “Large Datasets at A Glance: Combining Textures And Colors In Scientific Visualization”, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 5, 2, 145-167, 1999
  13. MILLER, J.R., “Attribute Blocks: Visualizing Multiple Continuously Defined Attributes”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 27, 3, 57-69, 2007
  14. ZHANG X., PAZNER, M., “The Icon Imagemap Technique for Multivariate Geospatial Data Visualization: Approach and Software System”, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 31, 1, 29-41, 2004
  15. NELSON, E. S., GILMARTIN, P. P., An Evaluation Of Multivariate, Quantitative Point Symbols For Maps, In C. H. WOOD, C. P. KELLER (Eds.) Cartographic Design: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives (pp. 191-203), 1996
  16. DIBIASE, D., “Designing Animated Maps for A Multimedia Encyclopedia”, Cartographic Perspectives, 19, 3-7, 1994
  17. NELSON, E.S., “Designing Eff