Journals / Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

ESTIMATION UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF SOME SEDIMENTERY ROCKS FROM OTHER PHYSICO-MECHANICAL PROPERTIES AT DIFFERENT WATER SATURATION DEGREE

FARKLI SUYA DOYGUNLUK DERECELERİNDE BAZI SEDİMANTER KAYAÇLARDA TEK EKSENLİ SIKIŞMA DAYANIMININ DİĞER FİZİKO-MEKANİK ÖZELLİKLERDEN KESTİRİMİ

Pages
681–691
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the predictive performance of models is good, especially at 70 and 100% degree saturation, and they are very practical tools to estimate the UCS at any water content using other mechanical properties.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The determination of the physico-mechanical properties of rocks is a very important issue in a lot of engineering applications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose the UCS, point load strength, Schmidt and Shore rebound hardness, ultrasonic wave velocity and Brazilian tensile strength were determined for specimens at oven dried and 35, 70 and 100% saturated specimens.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the predictive performance of models is good, especially at 70 and 100% degree saturation, and they are very practical tools to estimate the UCS at any water content using other mechanical properties.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kayaç · nokta yükleme dayanım indeksi · Regresyon analizi

Abstract

The determination of the physico-mechanical properties of rocks is a very important issue in a lot of engineering applications. Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) is one of the most important properties of rocks. The method to determine it is relatively simple, but it is time consuming, expensive and requires a well-prepared rock sample. For this reason, other physico-mechanical properties are frequently used to predict the UCS. Specimens used in this kind of work are either dry or have uncontrolled water content. This study aims to develop models for estimating the UCS at any water content, and some laboratory tests were carried out on different types of sedimentary rocks. For this purpose the UCS, point load strength, Schmidt and Shore rebound hardness, ultrasonic wave velocity and Brazilian tensile strength were determined for specimens at oven dried and 35, 70 and 100% saturated specimens. Simple and multiple regression analyses were carried out. The results showed that the predictive performance of models is good, especially at 70 and 100% degree saturation, and they are very practical tools to estimate the UCS at any water content using other mechanical properties.

Özet

Mühendislik tasarımlarının pek çoğunda kayaçların fiziko-mekanik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi önem taşımaktadır. Bu özelliklerin en önemlilerinden bir tanesi olan tek eksenli sıkışma dayanımının belirlenmesinde uygun laboratuvar koşullarının gerekliliği ve standartlara uygun örnek hazırlamanın zorlukları bu parametrenin diğer fiziko-mekanik özelliklerden istatistiksel metodlar kullanılarak tahmin edilmesi çalışmalarını yaygınlaştırmıştır. Bu amaçla yapılan çalışmalarda kullanılan numuneler genellikle kuru halde veya kontrol edilemeyen su içeriğine sahip olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada üç farklı sedimanter kökenli kayaç numunesinde kontrollü şekilde suya doygunluk oluşturularak; kuru ağırlıkça %35, 70 ve 100 doygun koşullarda iken tek eksenli sıkışma dayanımı (TESD), nokta yükleme dayanımı, dolaylı çekme dayanımı (Brazilian), Schmidt ve Shore sertliği, ultrasonik hız tayini deneyleri yapılmıştır. Basit ve çok değişkenli regresyon analizleri ile tek eksenli sıkışma dayanımını diğer fiziko-mekanik özelliklerden tahmin etmek için modeller geliştirilmiştir. Modellerin geçerliliği incelendiğinde %70 ve 100 suya doygunluk koşullarında tek eksenli sıkışma dayanımı ile diğer mekanik özellikler arasında güçlü ilişkilerin olduğu (R2>90) görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, E., SARICI, D. E. (2017). ESTIMATION UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF SOME SEDIMENTERY ROCKS FROM OTHER PHYSICO-MECHANICAL PROPERTIES AT DIFFERENT WATER SATURATION DEGREE. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 681–691. https://ajindex.com/articles/290316

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ASTM D 4543, “Standard Practice for Preparing Rock Core Specimens and Determining Dimensional and Shape Tolerances”, Philadelphia, 2001
  2. YILMAZ, I., ‘‘Influence of Water Content on the Strength and Deformability of Gypsum”, International Journal of Rock Mechanic and Mining Science, 47, 342-347, 2010
  3. HARRISON, H.P., HUDSON, J.A., Engineering Rock Mechanics Part2: Illustrative Worked Examples, Pergamon Press, London, UK, 2000
  4. GOEL, R., SINGH, B., Engineering Rock Mass Classification Tunneling Foundations and Lanslides, Butterworth-Heinemann, London, UK, 2011
  5. MISHRA, D., BASU, A., “Estimation of Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rock Materials by Index Test Using Regression Analysis and Fuzzy Inference System”, Engineering Geology, 160, 54-68, 2013
  6. KAHRAMAN, S., “Evaluation of Simple Methods for Assessing the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rock”, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 38, 981-994, 2001
  7. BAREFIELD, E., SHAKOOR, A., “The Effect of Degree of Saturation on the Unconfined Compressive Strength of Selected Sandstones”, 10th IAEG International Congress, 606-612, Nottingham, UK, 2006
  8. AJALLOIAN, R.M., KARIMZADEH, L., “Geotechnical Rock Mass Evaluation of Givi Dam Site (Case Study, Ardabil Iran)”, 10th ISRM Congress, 7-10,Sandton, South Africa, 2003
  9. VASARHELYI, B., “Some Observations Regarding the Strength and Deformability of Sandstones in Case of Dry and Saturated Conditions”, Bulletin Engineering Geological Environment, 62, 245-249, 2003
  10. KILIÇ, A., TEYMEN, A., “Determination of Mechanical Properties Rocks Using Simple Methods”, Bulletin Engineering Geological Environment, 67, 237-244, 2003
  11. ERSOY, H., KANİK, D., “Multicriteria Decision-Making Analysis Based Methodogy for Predicting Carbonate Rocks Uniaxial Compressive Strength”, Earth Science Rescue Journal, 16(1), 65-74, 2012
  12. MISHRA, D.A., BASU, A., “Use of the Block Punch Test to Predict to Compressive and Tensile Strengths of Rocks”, International Journal of Rock Mechanic and Mining Science, 51, 119-127, 2012
  13. SÖNMEZ, H., GÖKÇEOĞLU, C., MEDLEY, E.W., TUNCAY, E., NEFESİLİOĞLU, H.A., “Estimating the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of a Volcanic Bedrock”, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 43(4), 554-561, 2006
  14. TSIAMBAOS, G., SABATAKAKIS, N., “Consideration on Strength of Intact Sedimentary Rocks”, Engineering Geology, 72, 261-273, 2004
  15. FENER, M., KAHRAMAN, S., BİLGİL, A., GÜNAYDIN