SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Chemistry Laboratory Experiences of Prospective Biology Teachers: A Case Study

Biyoloji Öğretmen Adaylarının Kimya Laboratuvar Yaşantıları: Bir Durum Çalışması

Sinem DİNÇOL ÖZGÜR
Pınar ÖZDEMİR ŞİMŞEK
Ayhan YILMAZ.
Pages
125–155
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Prospective biology teachers were found to have several different types of needs with respect to chemistry laboratory experiences.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to evaluate the experiences of prospective biology teachers in the chemistry laboratory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Prospective biology teachers’ experiences, including their preparation for laboratory work, the duration of laboratory work, experiences following laboratory work and benefits derived from the work were investigated and methods of optimizing laboratory conditions were identified by observing current situations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Prospective biology teachers were found to have several different types of needs with respect to chemistry laboratory experiences.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:kimya laboratuvarı · biyoloji öğretmen adayları · nitel durum çalışması

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the experiences of prospective biology teachers in the chemistry laboratory. Prospective biology teachers’ experiences, including their preparation for laboratory work, the duration of laboratory work, experiences following laboratory work and benefits derived from the work were investigated and methods of optimizing laboratory conditions were identified by observing current situations. Participants comprised prospective biology teachers studying at Hacettepe University in the Department of Biology Education and registered in the General Chemistry Laboratory II course. The case study research design—a qualitative research method was utilized. The data for the research were collected through interview, observation and document analysis. The results obtained were evaluated by applying content analysis to assess data. Prospective biology teachers were found to have several different types of needs with respect to chemistry laboratory experiences.

Özet

Bu çalışmada biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının kimya laboratuvarı yaşantılarının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu bağlamda kimya laboratuvarına hazırlık, laboratuvarda geçirilen süreçler, yaşanan zorluklar, laboratuvar sonrası yaşantılarına ve laboratuvarın onlara katkılarına ilişkin sorulara yanıtlar aranmış ve laboratuvar koşullarının daha iyi duruma getirilmesi adına onlar tarafından değiştirilmesi istenen konularda bilgi alınmıştır. Çalışmaya Hacettepe Üniversitesi Biyoloji Eğitimi Anabilim Dalında okuyan ve Temel Kimya Laboratuvarı II dersine kayıtlı olan öğretmen adayları katılmıştır. Çalışmada nitel araştırma desenlerinden; durum çalışması araştırma deseni kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada veriler; görüşme, gözlem ve doküman inceleme yollarıyla toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizi için içerik analizi yapılarak, sonuçlar değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının kimya laboratuvar yaşantılarına ilişkin ihtiyaçları da belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÜR, S. D., ŞİMŞEK, P. Ö., YILMAZ., A. (2016). Chemistry Laboratory Experiences of Prospective Biology Teachers: A Case Study. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 125–155. https://ajindex.com/articles/289922

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adami, G.A. (2006). New project-based laboratory for undergraduate environmental and analytical chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 253. Akdeniz, A. R., Çepni, S., & Azar, A. (1998). Fizik öğretmen adaylarının laboratuvar kullanım becerilerini geliştirmek için bir yaklaşım. Paper presented at III. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu, KTÜ, Trabzon, 118–125.
  2. Ayas, A., Akdeniz, A.R., & Çepni, S. (1994). Fen bilimlerinde laboratuvarın yeri ve önemi-I. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 204, 21–25.
  3. Ayas, A., Karamustafaoğlu, S., Sevim, S., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2002). Academicians’ and students’ views of general chemistry laboratory applications. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 23, 50–56.
  4. Aydoğdu, C. (2003). A comparasion of the constructive laboratory method and traditional laboratory method on the students achievements in chemistry education. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 25, 14–18.
  5. Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Azizoğlu, N., & Uzuntiryaki, E. (2006). Chemistry laboratory anxiety scale. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30, 55–62.
  6. Beach, D. H., & Stone, H. M. (1988). Provocative opinion: Survival of the high school chemistry lab. Journal of Chemical Education, 65(7), 619–620.
  7. Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1982). Qualitative research for education to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Borrmann, T. (2008). Laboratory education in New Zealand. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4 (4), 327–335.
  8. Cheung, D. (2007). Facilitating chemistry teachers to implement inquiry-based laboratory work. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 107–130.
  9. Choi, A., Hand, B., & Greenbowe, T. (2013). Students’ written arguments in general chemistry laboratory investigations. Research in Science Education, 43, 1763–1783.
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks; London; New Delhi: Sage Publications. Cronholm, T., Höög, J.O., & Martenson, D. (2000). Student attitudes towards laboratory exercises in medical biochemistry. Medical Teacher, 22 (1), 30–33.
  11. Çilenti, K. (1985). Fen eğitimi teknolojisi. Ankara:
  12. Kadıoğlu Matbaası. Deacon, C., & Hajek, A. (2011). Student perceptions of the value of physics laboratories. International Journal of Science Education, 33 (7), 943–977.
  13. Değirmençay, Ş. A. (2000). Fizik öğretmenlerinin laboratuvar be