These perspectives are performance, distributed programming and system level services.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, two of the widely used distributed object system standards which are CORBA and Java RMI has been compared from different perspectives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper, two of the widely used distributed object system standards which are CORBA and Java RMI has been compared from different perspectives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These perspectives are performance, distributed programming and system level services.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
In this paper, two of the widely used distributed object system standards which are CORBA and Java RMI has been compared from different perspectives. These perspectives are performance, distributed programming and system level services.
Özet
Bu çalışmada, günümüzde dağıtık sistemlerin nesneye dayalı olarak modellenmesinde en çok kullanılan standartlardan olan CORBA ve Java RMI farklı bakış açılarından karşılaştırılmaktadır. Bu bakış açıları; performans, dağıtık programlama ve sistem düzeyinde sunulan servislerdir.
🔖
Cite This Article
TÜRKSEVER, M., ERDUR, R. C. (2001). Comparision of Java RMI and CORBA from different perspectives. Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 63–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/289312
Anonymous, 1997. Microsoft Visual Basic Component Tools Guide. Microsoft Corporation, 796p. Anonymous, 1998. Sun Microsystems. ”Java Development Kit Documentation JDK1.2”. Available at http://www.javasoft.com.
Orfali, R., Harkey, D. and Edwards, J. 1997.
Instant CORBA, John Wiley and Sons. Orfali, R. and Harkey, D. 1998. Client/Server Programming With Java and CORBA, John Wiley and Sons. Pedrick, D., Weedon, J., Goldberg, J. and Bleifield E. 1998.
Programming with Visibroker, Wiley Computer Publishing. Saleh, K., Probert, R. and Khanafer, H. 1999. “The Distributed Object Computing Paradigm: Concepts and Applications”, The Journal of Systems and Software, 47 (1999) 125-131, Elsevier Science Inc.