Journals / Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2001 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Atkı örmeciliği esnasında uçuntu oluşumu üzerine bir çalışma 1. Bölüm: Kaynak taraması

A study of fly generation during weft knitting part 1: Literature review

Pages
381–387
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although there is no listed literature for fly prediction techniques, fiber and yarn properties, along with knitting parameters, can be used for fiber-fly prediction during knitting.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study of fly generation during weft knitting has attracted the attention of many workers for decades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Among all fiber properties, the fiber length has the greatest effect on the amount of fly generated during knitting.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although there is no listed literature for fly prediction techniques, fiber and yarn properties, along with knitting parameters, can be used for fiber-fly prediction during knitting.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The study of fly generation during weft knitting has attracted the attention of many workers for decades. Among all fiber properties, the fiber length has the greatest effect on the amount of fly generated during knitting. Blending with a synthetic fiber type also reduces the fly generation due to an increase in the fiber mean length. Additionally, yarn moisture content, stitch length, yarn speed and input tension, and package conicity have a significant effect on the fly generation. Although there is no listed literature for fly prediction techniques, fiber and yarn properties, along with knitting parameters, can be used for fiber-fly prediction during knitting.

Özet

Atkı örmeciliği esnasında oluşan uçuntu yıllarca pekçok kişinin ilgisini çekmiştir. Örme esnasında lifin bütün özellikleri yanında lif uzunluğu uçuntu miktarı üzerinde en fazla etkiye sahiptir. Sentetik lifler ile karışım ortalama lif uzunluğunu arttırdığı için uçuntu miktarında azalmaya sebebiyet verirler. Ayrıca iplikteki nem miktarı, örgü uzunluğu, ipliğin besleme hızı ve gerilmesi ile ipliğin sarılı oiduğu bobinin konikliği uçuntu miktarı üzerinde büyük etkiye sahiptir. Uçuntu miktarının önceden tahmin edilmesi üzerine herhangi bir çalışma olmamasına rağmen lif ve iplik özellikleri örme parametreleri ile birlikte kullanılarak, örme esnasındaki uçuntu miktarı tahmin edilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKSEKKAYA, M. E. (2001). Atkı örmeciliği esnasında uçuntu oluşumu üzerine bir çalışma 1. Bölüm: Kaynak taraması. Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 381–387. https://ajindex.com/articles/289300

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Barella, A. 1966. The Hairiness of Yarns: A Review of the Literature and a Survey of the Present Position, J. Textile Inst. 57, T461-T489. Barella, A. and Ruiz-Cuevas, M. 1958. Some Factors Affecting the Hairiness of Worsted Yarns, J. Textile Inst. 49, T170-T171. Barella, A., Torn, J., and Vigo, J. P. 1971. Application of a New Hairiness Meter to the Study of Sources of Yarn Hairiness, Textile Res. J. 41, 126-133.
  2. Brown, P. 1978. A Preliminary Study of the Fiber- Length Distribution in Fly Produced During the Weft Knitting of Cotton Yarns, Textile Res. J. 48, 162-166.
  3. Bühler, G., Rieder, O., and Haussler, W. 1987. The Origins of Fiber Fly on Knitting Machines and Ideas for Reducing their Harmful Effect upon Knitting- Efficiency, Knitting Tech. 9, 250-258.
  4. Bühler, G., Rieder, O., and Haussler, W. 1988.
  5. Fiber Fly, A Serious Problem for the Knitting Industry, Knitting Tech. 10, 163-166.
  6. Bühler, G., Rieder, O. and Haussler, W. 1990. The Reduction of Fiber Fly by Obtaining the Best Possible Results from the Knitting Yarns, Knitting Tech. 12, 35-39 and 208-211.
  7. Goswami, B. C. 1969. The Hairiness of Cotton Yarns an Improvement Over the Existing Microscopic Technique, Textile Res. J. 39, 234-242.
  8. Knapton, J. J. F. 1972. Knitting of High Quality Double Knit Cloth: Part 2, Knitting Times, 41, 44- 49. Lawrence, C. A., and Mohamed, S. A. 1996. Yarn and Knitting Parameters Affecting Fly During Weft Knitting of Staple Yarns, Textile Res. J. 66, 694- 704. Lee, J. R. and Ruppenicker, G. F. 1978. Effects of Processing Variables on the Properties of Cotton Knitting Yarns, Textile Res. J. 48, 27-31.
  9. Lyne, D. G. 1955. The Dynamic Friction Between Cellulose Acetate Yarn and Cylindrical Metal Surface, J. Textile Inst. 46, P112-P118. Munden, D. L. 1959. The Geometry and Dimensional Properties of Plain-Knit Fabrics, J. Textile Inst. 50, T448-T471. Munden, D. L. 1962. Specification of Construction of Knitted Fabrics, J. Textile Inst. 53, P628-P630. Munden, D. L. Knapton, J. J. F. and Frith, C. D. 1961. Factors Affecting the Properties of Plain- Knitted Fabrics Knitted from Bulked and Stretch Yarns, J. Textile Inst. 52, P488-P507. Pillay, K. P. R. 1964. A Study of the Hairiness of Cotton Yarns Part I: Effect of Fiber and Yarn Factors, Textile Res. J. 34, 663-674.
  10. Pillay, K. P. R. 1964a. A Study of the Hairiness of Cotton Yarns Part II: Effect of Processing Factors, Textile Res. J. 34, 783-791.
  11. Röder, H. L. 1953. Measurements of the Influence of Finishing Agents on the Friction of F