Journals / Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Route selection in transportation networks using information axiom

Ulaşım ağlarında bilgi aksiyomu kullanılarak güzergah (rota) seçimi

Pages
425–435
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Axiomatic approach including crisp information axiom for complete information and fuzzy information axiom for incomplete information is used as a tool for the evaluation of alternative routes in Denizli.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Route choice in urban transportation networks is a complex decision making problem for the road users.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This decision has resulted in different ways such as increase in transportation cost and negative effects on driver psychology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Axiomatic approach including crisp information axiom for complete information and fuzzy information axiom for incomplete information is used as a tool for the evaluation of alternative routes in Denizli.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Route choice in urban transportation networks is a complex decision making problem for the road users. This decision has resulted in different ways such as increase in transportation cost and negative effects on driver psychology. Travel time, congestion, safety and environmental effects are the important criteria that should be taken in to account in route choice. Selection of the convenient route under determined criteria using the information axiom will be realized in this study. The Information axiom, the second axiom of Axiomatic Design (AD) principles, proposes the selection of the proper alternative that has minimum information content. Axiomatic approach including crisp information axiom for complete information and fuzzy information axiom for incomplete information is used as a tool for the evaluation of alternative routes in Denizli.

Özet

Ulaşım ağlarında rota seçimi büyük kentlerde yaşayanlar için önemli bir karar problemidir. Seçilen rotaya bağlı olarak ulaşım maliyetleri ve sürücü sağlığı önemli oranda etkilenmektedir. Rota seçiminde göz önüne alınması gereken ölçütler seyahat süresi, tıkanma seviyesi, güvenlik ve çevre faktörü olarak sınıflandırılabilirler. Bu çalışma, belirtilen ölçütleri göz önüne alarak sürücüler için en uygun rotanın değerlendirilmesi ve seçilmesinde bilgi aksiyomunu kullanan bir yaklaşımı sunmaktadır. Bilgi aksiyomu, aksiyomlarla tasarım prensiplerinin ikinci aksiyomu olup minimum bilgi içeriğine sahip alternatifin seçilmesini önermektedir. Kesin (crisp) ölçüt değerleri için klasik bilgi aksiyomu yaklaşımını ve bulanık (fuzzy) ölçüt değerleri için bulanık bilgi aksiyomu yaklaşımını içeren bu yöntem, Denizli kentinde rotaların değerlendirilmesi için uygulanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MURAT, Y. Ş., KULAK, O. (2005). Route selection in transportation networks using information axiom. Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 425–435. https://ajindex.com/articles/289176

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Anonim, 2004. Denizli Emniyet Müdürlüğü Kaza Kayıtları, Denizli Emniyet Müdürlüğü. 2.Arslan, T. and Khisty, C. J. 2004. A Rational Reasoning Method From Fuzzy Perceptions in Route Choice, Fuzzy Sets and Systems (article in press). 3.Babic, B. 1999. Axiomatic Design of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, International Journal Of Production Research, 37 (5), 1159-1173. 4.Binetti, M. and De Mitri, M. 2002. Traffic Assignment Model With Fuzzy Travel cost. Proceedings of the 13th Mini-EURO Conference on Uncertainity in Transportation, Bari, Italy, pp. 805-812. 5.Büyüközkan, G., Ertay, T., Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., 2004. Determining The Importance Weights for the Design Requirements in the House of Quality Using The Fuzzy Analytic Network Approach, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 19 (5), 443-461. 6.Chen, S. J., Chen, L. C. and Lin L. 2000. Knowledge-Based Support for Simulation Analysis of Manufacturing Cells, Computers in Industry, 44, 33-49. 7.Cochran, D. S., Eversheim, W., Kubin, G. and Sesterhenn, M. L. 2000. The Application of Ad and Lean Management Principles in the Scope of Production System Segmentation, International Journal of Production Research, 38 (6), 1159-1173. 8.Daganzo, C. 1979. Multinomial Probit: The Theory and its Application to Travel Demand Forecasting, Academic Press, New York. 9.De Boer, L., Van Der Wegen, L., Jan Telgen, J. 1998. Outranking Methods in Support of Supplier Selection, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 4 (2-3), 109-118. 10.Deng, H., Yeh C. H., Willis, R. J. 2000. Inter-Company Comparison Using Modified Topsis With Objective Weights, Computers & Operations Research, 27, 963-973. 11.Henn, V. 2000. Fuzzy Route Choice Model for Traffic Assignment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Elsevier Sciences, 116, pp. 77-101. 12.Henn, V. 2002. What is the Meaning of Fuzzy Costs in Fuzzy Traffic Assignment Models. Proceedings of the 13th Mini-EURO Conference on Uncertainity in Transportation, Bari, Italy, pp. 231-239. 13.Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ruan, D. 2004. Multi-Attribute Comparison Ofcatering Service Companies Using Fuzzy Ahp: The Case of Turkey, International Journal of Production Economics, 87,171-184. 14.Kulak, O. and Kahraman, C. 2004. Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Transportation Company Selection Among The Alternatives Using Axiomatic Design and Analytic Hierarchy Process. Information Science, Accepted Paper, (In Progress For Publishing). 15.Kulak, O., Durmuşoglu, M.B. and Tüfekçi, S. 2004. A Complete Cellular Manufact