Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2020 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Penetrating Keratoplasty Combined With Temporary Keratoprosthesis in Traumatic Cases

Pages
328–332
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Patients should be informed about the long-term functional outcomes of this complicated surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the functional and anatomical outcomes of patients underwent combined pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) using temporary keratoprosthesis (TKP) for vitreoretinal pathology and corneal opacities secondary to severe ocular trauma.Materials and Methods: Medical records of participants that underwent combined PPV and PKP surgery with TKP for severe eye trauma were retrospectively analysed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:During the follow-up, functional success (best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)) remained the same or increased, and anatomic success (retinal reattachment, graft transparency) and complications were evaluated.Results: Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients (mean age 43.40±22.43 years, 15 male/7 female) were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patients should be informed about the long-term functional outcomes of this complicated surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose: To evaluate the functional and anatomical outcomes of patients underwent combined pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) using temporary keratoprosthesis (TKP) for vitreoretinal pathology and corneal opacities secondary to severe ocular trauma.Materials and Methods: Medical records of participants that underwent combined PPV and PKP surgery with TKP for severe eye trauma were retrospectively analysed. During the follow-up, functional success (best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)) remained the same or increased, and anatomic success (retinal reattachment, graft transparency) and complications were evaluated.Results: Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients (mean age 43.40±22.43 years, 15 male/7 female) were included in this study. The mean follow-upperiod was 12±7.8 months. At the last follow-up, BCVA increased in 3 patients (13.6%) and remained unchanged in 16 patients (72.7%). Two of 3 patients had decreased BCVA with LogMAR chart from 2.10 to 3.10 logMAR, while 1 patient had decreased from 3.10 logMAR to loss of light sensation (13.6%). At the last follow-up, the retina was attached in 16 patients (72,8%). Corneal graft remained transparent during follow-up in 12 patients (54.5%), while graft failure was seen in 10 eyes (45.5%). Conclusion: PPV and PKP surgery combined with TKP is an alternative method for patients with corneal opacities that not allowed to vitrectomy. Although retinal reattachment is achieved in the majority of patients, corneal graft failure is a common postoperative complication. Patients should be informed about the long-term functional outcomes of this complicated surgery.

🔖

Cite This Article

BESEK, N. K., ERDOGAN, G., ERIS, E., ER, M. O., SONMEZ, O., DEMIR, G., ALKIN, Z. T. (2020). Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Penetrating Keratoplasty Combined With Temporary Keratoprosthesis in Traumatic Cases. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 328–332. https://ajindex.com/articles/289081

References (12)

  1. Al Sabti K, Raizada S. “Endoscope-assisted pars plana vitrectomy in severe ocular trauma,” British Journal of Ophthalmology 2012; 96: 1399-403
  2. Gross JG, Feldman S, Freeman WR. Combine penetrating keratoplasty and vitreoretinal surgery with the Eckart temporary keratoprosthesis. Opthalmic Surgery 1990; 21:67-71
  3. Kapran Z, Ozkaya A, Erdogan G, et al. Wide-Field Landers Keratoprothesis in Various Combined Corneal and Vitreoretinal Problems: Twelve-Month Results.Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017; 48:237-41
  4. Landers III M.B, Foulks G.N, Landers D.M, et al. Hamilton, “Temporary keratoprosthesis for use during pars plana vitrectomy,” American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1981;91:615-9
  5. Agrawal P.K. The pathology of cornea (A histopathological study)Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 1983;31:662-5 6. Spiegel D, Nasemann J, Nawrocki J, et al. “Severe ocular trauma managed with primary pars plana vitrectomy and silicone oil,” Retina.1997;17: 275-85
  6. Chun DW, Colyer MH, Wroblewski KJ. Visual and anatomic outcomes of vitrectomy with temporary keratoprosthesis or endoscopy in ocular trauma with opaque cornea. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2012;43:302-10
  7. Nowomiejska K, Haszcz D, Forlini C, et al. Moneta-Wielgos J., Maciejewski R., Zarnowski T., Juenemann A.G., Rejdak R. Wide-Field Landers Temporary Keratoprosthesis in Severe Ocular Trauma: Functional and Anatomical Results after One Year. J Ophthalmol. 2015: 163675
  8. Ung C, Stryjewski TP, Eliott. Indications, Findings, and Outcomes of Pars Plana Vitrectomy after Open Globe Injury. D.Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 (10). pii: S2468-6530(19)30541 10. Mayalı H, Kayıkçıoğlu Ö, Altınışık M, et al. Clinical Results in Patients with Combined Penetrating Keratoplasty and Vitreoretinal Surgery Using Landers Wide-fi eld Temporary Keratoprosthesis. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct; 49: 270-6
  9. Zimmerman T, Olson R, Waltman S, et al. Transplant size and elevated intraocular pressure. Postkeratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96:2231-3
  10. Noorily SW, Foulks GN, McCuen BW. Results of penetreting keratoplasty associated with silicon oil retinal tamponade. Ophthtalmology 1991;98:1186-9
  11. Roters S, Hamzei P, Szurman P, et al. “Combined penetrating keratoplasty and vitreoretinal surgery with silicone oil: a 1- year follow-up,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2003;241: 24-33
  12. Gelender H, Vaiser A, Snyder W.B, et al. Temporary keratoprosthesis for combined penetrating keratoplasty,