✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
We have observed scrotal erosion in a patient who had been implanted with an AUS device for a second time for the treatment of total urinary incontinence due to open prostatectomy.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We have observed scrotal erosion in a patient who had been implanted with an AUS device for a second time for the treatment of total urinary incontinence due to open prostatectomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We have observed scrotal erosion in a patient who had been implanted with an AUS device for a second time for the treatment of total urinary incontinence due to open prostatectomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We have observed scrotal erosion in a patient who had been implanted with an AUS device for a second time for the treatment of total urinary incontinence due to open prostatectomy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Erkek · Yaşlı · İdrar kaçırma
Abstract
We have observed scrotal erosion in a patient who had been implanted with an AUS device for a second time for the treatment of total urinary incontinence due to open prostatectomy.
Özet
Transvezikal prostatektomi sonrası total iiriner inkontinans gelişen bir olguda 2. kez uygulanan artifisyel üriner sfinkter (A US) implantasyonu sonrası skrotal erozyon gözlendi. Literatür bilgileri ışığında artifisyel üriner sfinkter komplikasyonları tartışıldı.
Keywords
🔖
Cite This Article
İMAMOĞLU, M. A., BAKIRTAŞ, H., SAĞNAK, L., YİĞİTBAŞI, O., ERSOY, H. (2002). A scrotal erosion case which is occured after aus implantation. Optimal Tıp Derg., Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 27–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/288608