Journals / Orta Asya ve Kafkasya Araştırmaları / 2011 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 12

Political Parties in the Turkic Republics: A Comparative Analysis on Kazakh and Uzbek Political Party Systems

Türk Cumhuriyetlerinde Siyasal Partiler: Kazakistan ve Özbekistan Siyasal Parti Sistemleri Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz

Pages
68–87
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this analysis, the political parties’ law of the two countries is explained and the differences between these countries are dealt with.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Political parties are one of the most important criteria in the analysis of a country’s democratization process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Traditional party structures of these countries played a significant role in the establishment of the post-independence party system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this analysis, the political parties’ law of the two countries is explained and the differences between these countries are dealt with.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Political parties are one of the most important criteria in the analysis of a country’s democratization process. Post-Soviet Turkic Republics took over structures of the local Communist Party from Soviet system. Traditional party structures of these countries played a significant role in the establishment of the post-independence party system. This article analyzes Kazakhstan, where dominant-custodian party system with limited space for opposition parties has been institutionalized and Uzbekistan, where a corporatist system with no room for opposition parties has emerged. For this analysis, the political parties’ law of the two countries is explained and the differences between these countries are dealt with.

Özet

Bir ülkenin demokratikleşme sürecinin analizinde en önemli kriterlerden biri siyasal partilerdir. Sovyet sonrası Türk Cumhuriyetleri Sovyet sisteminden yerel Komünist Parti yapılanmalarını aynen devralmıştır, ki bu ülkelerin sahip oldukları geleneksel parti yapısı bağımsızlık sonrasında oluşan parti sisteminde belirleyici rol oynamıştır. Bu çalışmada muhalefet partilerine sınırlı alan tanıyan hakim-vesayetçi parti sisteminin kurumsallaşmaya başladığı Kazakistan ile muhalefet partilerine sistem içinde yer vermeyen dolayısıyla korporatist bir sistem olarak gelişme gösteren Özbekistan ele alınacaktır. İki ülkenin siyasi partiler kanunu ve bu kanunun uygulanması hakkında bilgi verildikten sonra bu kapsamda iki ülke arasındaki farklılıklar ortaya konulmaya çalışılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALKAN, H., DURKAL, M. E. (2011). Political Parties in the Turkic Republics: A Comparative Analysis on Kazakh and Uzbek Political Party Systems. Orta Asya ve Kafkasya Araştırmaları, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 12, 68–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/288302

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abazov, Rafis, “The 1999 Presidential Elections in Kazakhstan”, Electoral Studies, Cilt: 20, Sayı: 2, 2001.
  2. Alibekov, İbrahim, “Russian Party of Kazakhstan may Reflect Moscow’s Influence”, Eurasia Insight, 14 Nisan 2002, (http://www.eurasianet.org/depart ments/insight/articles/eav042402a.shtml). Alkan, Haluk, Orta Asya Türk Cumhuriyetlerinde Siyasal Hayat ve Kurumlar (Ankara: USAK Yayınları, 2011).
  3. Fierman, William, “Political Development in Uzbekistan: Democratization?”, Karen Dawisha & Bruce Parrott (Der.), Conflict, Cleavage and Change in Central Asia and the Caucasus, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
  4. Grodsky, Brian, “Resource Dependency and Political Opportunity: Explaining the Transformation from Excluded Political Opposition Parties to Human Rights Organizations in Post-Communist Uzbekistan”, Government and Opposition, Cilt: 42, Sayı: 1, 2007.
  5. Hayrmuhanmedov, Nurbek, “Kazakistan Siyasal Sisteminde Partilerin Konumu ve Fonksiyonları”, Ahmet Yesevi Stratejik Araştırma Merkezi, 08 Nisan 2005, (http://www.aysam.gen.tr/yay_news.php?newsid=222)
  6. Isaacs, Rico, “The Parliamentary Election in Kazakhstan, August 2007”,
  7. Electoral Studies, Cilt: 27, Sayı: 2, 2008.
  8. Lillis, Joanna, “Kazakhstan Set to Have One-Party Parliament Following Disputed Election”, Eurasia Insight, 20 Ağustos 2007, (http://www.unhcr.org/refworld /publisher,EURASIANET,,KAZ,46cedbf25a,0.html). Pannier, Bruce, “Conflict in Kyrgyzstan Threatens Fergana Valley”, RFE/RL, 1 Eylül 1999, (http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1092068.html).
  9. Pannier, Bruce, “Kazakhstan: Ruling Party Gets Even Bigger”, RFE/RL, 30 Aralık 2006, (http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1073642.html).
  10. Türk, Fahri, “Transformasyon Sürecinde Özbekistan’da Siyasal Partiler ve Özbek Muhalefet Liderlerinin Türk-Özbek ilişkileri Üzerine Etkileri”, Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, Aralık 2008.
  11. Yılmaz, İhsan, “Predicaments And Prospects in Uzbek Islamism: A Critical Comparison with The Turkish Case”, Orta Asya ve Kafkasya Araştırmaları Dergisi- OAKA, Cilt: 3, Sayı: 6, 2008. “Defeated Kazakh Election Candidates Plan to Set Up Own Parliament”, Kazakh Commercial Television, Text Report, 25 Ekim 1999,
  12. Almaty. “Kazakh Deputies Approve Unlimited Terms For Nazarbaev”, RFE/RL, 18 Mayıs 2007, (http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1076560.html). “Political Struggle in Kazakhstan a Reflection of Maturation of Counry’s Economy”, Eurasia Insight, 19 Haziran 2002, (http://www.eurasianet.org/depar tments/b