SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Osteoporoz Dünyasından / 2002 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

The femoral geometrical measurements in postmenopausal Turkish women

Postmenopozal Türk kadınlarında femur geometrik ölçüm sonuçları

H. T. ÇALIŞ
M. ERYAVUZ
M. ÇALIŞ
G. CAN
Pages
15–20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We think that these values are representatives of Turkish women and similar to the values of Caucasian women according to the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Femoral geometric measurements have been suggested to be important in the evaluation of the risk of osteoporotic hip fracture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to determine the normal values of femoral geometric measurements in Turkish women. 232 women were selected by using suitable sample procedure to reflect Turkish women normal values (%95 interval of confidence).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We think that these values are representatives of Turkish women and similar to the values of Caucasian women according to the literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Vücut kitle indeksi · Vücut ağırlıkları ve ölçüleri · Femur

Abstract

Femoral geometric measurements have been suggested to be important in the evaluation of the risk of osteoporotic hip fracture. The aim of this study was to determine the normal values of femoral geometric measurements in Turkish women. 232 women were selected by using suitable sample procedure to reflect Turkish women normal values (%95 interval of confidence). All of them were over 50 years of age postmenauposal women and none have had history of hip fracture. Hip axis length (HAL), femoral neck axis length (FNAL), acetabular width (AW), femoral head width (FHW), femoral neck width (FNW), femoral shaft width (FSW), intertrochanteric width (ITW), cortical bone thickness of the medial femoral neck (NMCT), medial femoral shaft cortical bone thickness (SMCT), lateral femoral shaft (SLCT), cortical bone thick-ness, femoral neck-shaft angle in degrees (N-SA) were measured bilaterally on standart AP plain pelvic X-ray radiograms. In the subjects mean age , weigth,heigth and body mass index (BMI) were 62.5±7.4, 70.84±12.5, 157.5+6.7, 28.58±4.9 respectively. Mean values of femoral geometric measurements for right andleft hip respectively were fallows: HAL130.5±8.9, 130.1 ±9.0 ; FNAL: 112,7±6.9, 112.5±6.9 ; FHW:53.3±3.2, 53.0±3.4; FNW:35.8±2.8, 35.9±2.7; FSW:37.6±3.0, 37.7+3.1; ITW: 62.5±5.3, 63.0±3.9; NMCT: 2.1+0.7, 2.0±0.6; SMCT: 7.8±1.4,7-1 ±1-3; SLOT: 7.0+1.3, 7.1 ±1.3; N-SA: 128.9±5.9,128.9±5.8.There were no statistically significant difference between right and left measurements. We think that these values are representatives of Turkish women and similar to the values of Caucasian women according to the literature.

Özet

Femur geometrik ölçümlerinin osteoporotik kalça kırığı riskini değerlendirmede önemli olduğu bildirilmektedir. Bu çalışmadaki amacımız Türk kadınlarında normal femur geometrik ölçümlerini belirlemekti. Türk kadınlarının normal değerlerini %95 güven aralığında yansıtacak 232 kadın uygun örneklem yolu kullanılarak seçildi. Olguların hepsi kalça kırığı hikayesi olmayan postmenopozal kadınlardı. Kalça eksen uzunluğı (KEU), femur eksen uzunluğu (FEU), asetabuler genişlik (AĞ), femur başı genişliği (FBG), femur boyun genişliği (FBOG), femur şaft genişliği (FŞG), trokanterler arası genişlik (TAG), femur boynu medial kortikal kalınlığı (FBMKK), femur şaftı medial kortikal kalınlığı (FŞMKK), femur şaftı lateral kortikal kalınlığı, femur boynu ile şaftı arasındaki açı (FB-Ş) standart AP x-ray grafide ölçüldü. Olguların ortalama yaş, kilo, boy, vücut kitle indeks (VKİ) değerleri: 62.5±7.4, 70.84112.5, 157.5±6.7, 28.58±4.9 şeklindeydi. Sağ ve sol kalça için femur geometrik ölçüm sonuçları: KEU:130.5±8.9, 130.1 ±9.0 ; FEU: 112.7±6.9,112.5±6.9 ; FBG: 53.3±3.2, 53.0±3.4; FBOG: 35.8±2.8, 35.9±2.7; FŞG: 37.6±3.0, 37.7+3.1 ; TAG: 62.5±5.3, 63.0±3.9; FBMKK: 2.1 ±0.7, 2.010.6; FŞMKK: 7.8±1.4,7.1 ±1.3; FŞLKK: 7.0±1.3, 7.1 ±1.3; FB-Ş: 128.9±5.9, 1 28.9±5.8. olarak bulundu. Sağ ve sol taraf ölçümler arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark yoktu. Biz bu sonuçların Türk kadınlarının femur geometrik ölçümlerini temsil ettiğini ve bu değerlerin beyaz ırktan olan kadınların sonuçlarıyla benzer olduğunu düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALIŞ, H. T., ERYAVUZ, M., ÇALIŞ, M., CAN, G. (2002). The femoral geometrical measurements in postmenopausal Turkish women. Osteoporoz Dünyasından, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 15–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/286798

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Dinçer M D: Osteoporoza bağlı kırıklar ve cerrahi tedavi yaklaşımları. İn: Kutsal Y G (Ed.) Osteoporoz. İstanbul: 1998
  2. 295 2. Cumming SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner W, Cauley J, Ensrud K et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. Lancet 1993
  3. 75 3. Law MR, Wald NJ, Meade TW. Strategies for prevention of osteoporosis and hip fracture. BMJ 1991
  4. Mazess RB, Barden H, Ettinger M, Schultz E. Bone density of the radius, spine, and proximal femur in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1988
  5. 8 5. Aloia JF, McGowan D, Erens E,Micle G. Hip fracture patients have generalized osteopenia with a preferential deficit in the femur. Osteoporosis Int 1991
  6. Melton LJ III, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Wahner HW. Riggs BL, Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 1993
  7. Peacock M, Turner CH, Liu G, Manatunga AK, Tim- merman L, Johnston JR CC Better discrimination of hip fracture using bone density, geometry and architecture. Osteoporosis Int 1995
  8. Faulkner KG, Cummings SR, Black D, Palermo L, Glüer CC, Genant HK. Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture:the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1993
  9. 8(Suppl 9. Coddy DD,Nahigian KK, Jamison JA, Divine GW, Windham JP. Bone density and bone geometry factors in hip fracture risk? J Bone Miner Res 1993
  10. 8(Suppl 1):355. 10. Center JR, Nguyen TV, etal. Femoral neck axis length, height loss and risk of hip fracture in males and fema¬ les. Osteoporosis Int 1996
  11. :75-81. 11. O'Neill TW, Grazio S, Spector TD, Silman AJ. Geometric measurements of the proximal femur in UK women: Secular increase between the late 1950s and early 1990s. Osteoporosis Int 1996
  12. Glüer CC, Cummings SR, Pressman A, et al. Prediction of hip fractures from pelvic radiographs: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Min Res 1994
  13. 9(5):671-677. 13. Karlsson KM, Sernbo I, Obrant KJ, et al. Femoral neck geometry and radiographic signs of osteoporosis as predictors of hip fracture. Bone 1996
  14. 18(4):327-330. 14. Theobald TM, Cauley JA, Gluer CC,et al. Black-white differences in hip geometry. Osteoporos Int 1998
  15. Sümbüloğlu K, Sümbüloğlu V. Örnekleme. Sümbüloğlu K, Sümbüloğlu V.(Ed) Biyoistatistik. Hatiboğlu Yayınevi. Ankara. 1990
  16. s214-39. 16. Tang-Kue Liu, Rong-Sen Yang. Proximal femoral dimension in the Chinese elderly women with hip fractures in Taiwan. Lindsay R