Journals / Osteoporoz Dünyasından / 2007 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Femoral geometry in male patients with atraumatic hip fracture

Atravmatik kalça kırığı olan erkek hastalarda femoral geometri

Pages
15–18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We concluded that besides femur geometric measurements, correlation between these measurements might be an important factors for the fracture risk. (From the World of Osteoporosis 2007;13:15-8)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Hip fracture is the most serious complication of osteoporosis and the most disabling type of fracture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we aimed to compare femoral geometry in hip fractured male patients aged more than 65 years old with age matched controls.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We concluded that besides femur geometric measurements, correlation between these measurements might be an important factors for the fracture risk. (From the World of Osteoporosis 2007;13:15-8)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Femur · Kalça kırıkları · Osteoporoz

Abstract

Aims: Hip fracture is the most serious complication of osteoporosis and the most disabling type of fracture. In this study, we aimed to compare femoral geometry in hip fractured male patients aged more than 65 years old with age matched controls. Patients and Methods: 20 male patients with a history of nontraumatic hip fracture and 19 age-matched healthy controls were included in this study. Bone mineral density of neck and trochanter of hip were measured by DEXA. In addition to BMD, an experienced radiologist measured proximal femur geometric parameters potentially involved in bone strength. Results: Mean BMDs of trochanteric region were not significantly different between groups, but mean BMDs of neck region were statistically significantly lower in the hip fractured group. Neck shaft angle and femur shaft width were the geometric parameters found to be significantly higher in the hip fractured group. The correlation between femur geometric and the anthropometric measurements was present only in the kontrol group. Conclusion: We concluded that besides femur geometric measurements, correlation between these measurements might be an important factors for the fracture risk. (From the World of Osteoporosis 2007;13:15-8)

Özet

Amaç: Kalça fraktürü osteoporozun en önemli ve en fazla sakatlık yaratan komplikasyonudur. Hastalar ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada femoral geometrik ölçümler açısından 65 yaşın üstündeki kalça kırığı geçirmiş erkek hastalar ile cins ve yaş eşleştirilmiş kontrol grubunu kıyaslamayı amaçladık. 20 non-travmatik kalça fraktürü gelişmiş erkek hasta ile 19 kontrol hastası çalışmaya dahil edildiler. Femur boynu ile trokanter kemik mineral yoğunluğu (KMY) ölçümleri Dual Energy Xray Absorbsiometri (DEXA) ile ölçüldü. Deneyimli bir Radyoloji uzmanı tarafından femur geometrik ölçümleri yapıldı. Bulgular: Kalça kırığı gelişen grupta ortalama femur KMY ölçümü istatistiksel olarak daha düşük bulunurken trokanter KMY ölçümü gruplar arasında farklılık göstermemiştir. Boyun shaft açısı ile femur shaft genişliği gruplar arasında anlamlı olarak farklılık gösteren ölçümlerdi. Femur geometrik ölçümleri ile antropometrik ölçümler arasındaki korelasyon sadece kontrol grubunda saptandı. Sonuç: Bu ölçümler arasındaki korelasyonun, femur geometrik ölçümlerinin yanı sıra kırık riski açısından önemli olabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır. (Osteoporoz Dünyasından 2007;13:15-8)

🔖

Cite This Article

TAN, G., ÖZ, B., ÖLMEZ, N., MEMİŞ, A., VİDİNLİ, B., ÖZDEMİR, M. A. (2007). Femoral geometry in male patients with atraumatic hip fracture. Osteoporoz Dünyasından, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 15–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/286759

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Sanders KM, Nicholson GC, Ugoni AM et al. Health burden of hip and other fractures in Australia beyond 2000. Projection based on the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Med J Aust 1999; 170: 467-70
  2. Hawker GA, Jamal SA, Ridoit R et al. A clinical prediction rule to identify premenopausal women with low bone mass. Osteoporos Int 2002; 13: 400-6
  3. Peacock M, Turner CH, Liu G, et al. Better discrimination of hip fracture using bone density, geometry architecture. Osteoporos Int 1995;5: 167-73
  4. Gnudi S, Ripamonti C, Gualtieri G et al. Geometry of proximal femur in the prediction of hip fracture in osteoporotic women. Br J Radiol 1999; 72: 729-33
  5. Alonso CG, Curiel MD, Carransa FH et al. Femoral bone mineral density, neck shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Osteoporos Int 2000; 11: 714-20
  6. El-Kaissi S, Pasco JA, Henry MJ, et al. Femoral neck geometry and hip fracture risk: Geelong osteoporosis study. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 1299-303
  7. Center JR, Nguyen TV, Pocock NA, et al. Femoral neck axis length, height loss and risk of hip fracture in males and females. Osteopros Int 1998; 8: 75-81
  8. Glüer CC, Cummings SR Pressmann A et al. Prediction of hip fracture from pelvic radiograghs:The study of osteoporotic fractures.The study of osteoporotic fractures research group. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9: 671-7
  9. Faulkner KG, Cummings SR, Black D, et al. Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture the study of osteoprotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1993; 8:1211-7
  10. Pulkkinen P, Partanen J, Jalovaara P et al. Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture. Osteopros Int 2004; 15: 274-80
  11. Greenspan SL, Myers ER, Maitland LA et al. Fall severity and bone mineral density as risk factors for hip fracture in ambulatory elderly. JAMA 1994; 271: 128-33
  12. Bergot C, Bousson V, Meunier A et al. Hip fracture risk and proximal femur geometry from DXA scans. Osteopros Int 2002; 13: 542-50
  13. Karlsson KM, Sernbo I, Obrant KJ et al. Femoral neck geometry and radiograghic signs of osteoprosis as predictors of hip fracture. Bone 1996; 18: 327-30
  14. Wand JS, Reeve J. Coxarthrosis and femoral neck fracture. Clin Orthop 1990; 278: 88-94
  15. Michelotti J, Clark J. Femoral neck length and hip fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 1714-20
  16. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fract