SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 22

THE EFFECTS OF NEED FOR TOUCH AND WRITTEN INFORMATION ON PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP

DOKUNMA İHTİYACI VE YAZILI BİLGİNİN PSİKOLOJİK SAHİPLİK ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Batuhan Doğu ALKAYA
Tülay KORKMAZ DEVRANİ
Pages
205–232
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Psychological ownership also positively affects word-ofmouth and customers purchase intention

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate the interaction between need for touch and written information and its effect on psychological ownership in the online shopping environment where physical interaction is not possible.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Also, the effect of psychological ownership on willingness to pay, word of mouth and purchase intention were examined in an online shopping environment. 561 questionnaires were distributed, but the analyses were conducted on 476 validated surveys.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Psychological ownership also positively affects word-ofmouth and customers purchase intention
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dokunma ihtiyacı · psikolojik sahiplik · yazılı bilgi

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the interaction between need for touch and written information and its effect on psychological ownership in the online shopping environment where physical interaction is not possible. Also, the effect of psychological ownership on willingness to pay, word of mouth and purchase intention were examined in an online shopping environment. 561 questionnaires were distributed, but the analyses were conducted on 476 validated surveys. As a result of the analyses, it is found that there is no interaction effect between need for touch low or high and written information on psychological ownership. Although, it is stated that the interaction between the subdimensions of need for touch autotelic and instrumental and written information has an influence on psychological ownership, the influence works in the opposite direction. As the psychological ownership increased in the online shopping environment, consumers’ willingness to pay increase. Psychological ownership also positively affects word-ofmouth and customers purchase intention

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı; tüketicinin dokunma ihtiyacı ile ürüne dokunma imkânının bulunmadığı çevrimiçi alışveriş ortamında, bu eksikliğin telafisi için sunulan yazılı bilgiler arasındaki etkileşimin psikolojik sahiplik üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktır. Ayrıca, çalışmada çevrimiçi alışveriş ortamında psikolojik sahipliğin belirlenen alış fiyatı, ağızdan ağıza iletişim ve satın alma niyeti üzerindeki etkisi incelenmiştir. Çalışmada 561 anket formu dağıtılmış ancak analizler geçerli kabul edilen 476 anket üzerinden yürütülmüştür. Yapılan analizler sonucunda dokunma ihtiyacının düşük veya yüksek oluşu ile yazılı bilgi türü arasındaki etkileşimin psikolojik sahiplik üzerinde etkisi olmadığı bulunmuştur. Diğer yandan dokunma ihtiyacının enstrümantal ve ototelik alt boyutlarının yazılı bilgi türü ile etkileşimi psikolojik sahipliği etkilemektedir. Ancak bu etki dokunma ihtiyacının boyutları ile yazılı bilgi arasında uyum olmadığı durumda ortaya çıkmaktadır. Çevrimiçi alışveriş ortamında ürüne karşı hissedilen psikolojik sahiplik arttıkça belirlenen alış fiyatı, ağızdan ağıza iletişim ve satın alma niyeti artmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

ALKAYA, B. D., DEVRANİ, T. K. (2018). THE EFFECTS OF NEED FOR TOUCH AND WRITTEN INFORMATION ON PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP. Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 22, 205–232. https://ajindex.com/articles/285759

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Alexandrov, A., Lilly, B. ve Babakus, E. (2013). The Effects of Social-and Self-Motives on the Intentions to Share Positive and Negative Word of Mouth. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(5): 531–546
  2. Arndt, J. (1967) Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product. Journal of Marketing Research 4: 291–295.
  3. Arnold, M.J. ve Reynolds, K.E. (2003). Hedonic Shopping Motivations. Journal of Retailing, 79(2): 77-95.
  4. Asatryan, Vahagn S. ve Haemoon Oh. (2008). Psychological Ownership Theory: An Exploratory Application in the Restaurant Industry. Journal of Hospita- lity and Tourism Research, 32(3): 363–386.
  5. Babin, J. B., Darden, W.R. ve Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic & Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(5): 644-656.
  6. Belk, R. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Customer Resear- ch, 15 (2): 139-168.
  7. Bone, P.F. (1995). Word-of-Mouth Effects on Short-Term and Long-Term Product Judgments. Journal of Business Research, 32(3): 213-223.
  8. Brasel, S.A. ve Gips, J. (2014).
  9. Tablets, Touchscreens, and Touchpads: How Var- ying Touch Interfaces Trigger Psychological Ownership and Endowment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2): 226–233.
  10. Lessard-Bonaventure, S. ve Chebat, J. (2016).
  11. Psychological Ownership, Touch, And Willingness to Pay for An Extended Warranty. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(2): 224–234.
  12. Childers, T.L., Carr, C.L., Peck, J. ve Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations for Online Retail Shopping Behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77: 511-535.
  13. Citrin, A., Stem, D., Spangenberg E. R. ve Clark, M. J. (2003). Consumer Need for Tactile Input: An Internet Retailing Challenge. Journal of Business Re- search, 56(11): 915–922.
  14. Craig, J. C. ve Rollman, G.B., (1999). Somesthesis. Annual Review of Psycho- logy. 50 (1): 305 – 331 Derbaix, C. ve Vanhamme, J. (2003). Inducing Word-of-Mouth by Eliciting Surpri- se - A Pilot Investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24 (1): 99-116.
  15. Dichter, E. (1966). How Word-of-Mouth Advertising Works. Harvard Business Review, 44: 147-157.
  16. Franciosi, R., Kujal, P., Michelitsch, R., Smith, V. ve Deng, G. (1996). Experi- mental Tests of the Endowment Effect. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 30 (2): 213–226.
  17. Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E. ve Schreier, M. (2010). The Psychological Effects of Em- powerment Strategies on Consumers’ Product Demand. Journal of Marke- ting, 74(1): 65–79.
  18. Fullerton, G. (2003). When D