SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 23

DOES PRICE ADVANTAGE ALWAYS PERCEIVED AS FAIR? EFFECTS OF CUSTOMER IDENTIFICATION BASED DIFFERENTIATED PRICING, CUSTOMER GROUP AND MONEY REFUND

AVANTAJLI FİYAT HER ZAMAN ADİL ALGILANIR MI? MÜŞTERİ KİMLİĞİ BAZLI FARKLILAŞTIRILMIŞ FİYATLANDIRMA, MÜŞTERİ GRUBU VE PARA İADESİNİN ETKİLERİ

ÖZGE SIĞIRCI
A. Ercan GEGEZ
Pages
21–53
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Money refunds on the other hand are found to have no significant effect on the fairness perception of customers

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main and interaction effects of customer identification-based differentiated pricing, customer group, and the price refund policy of the company on consumer fairness perceptions are examined. 2x2x3 between groups factorial design is used and scenarios are designed to manipulate independent variables. 12 different scenarios are read by different respondent groups, then the perceived fairness of these groups is measured and group differences are compared.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The fairness of offering higher prices either to new or former customers are perceived differently by new or former customer groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Money refunds on the other hand are found to have no significant effect on the fairness perception of customers
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fiyat · farklılaştırılmış fiyatlandırma · gelir yönetimi

Abstract

The main and interaction effects of customer identification-based differentiated pricing, customer group, and the price refund policy of the company on consumer fairness perceptions are examined. 2x2x3 between groups factorial design is used and scenarios are designed to manipulate independent variables. 12 different scenarios are read by different respondent groups, then the perceived fairness of these groups is measured and group differences are compared. The fairness of offering higher prices either to new or former customers are perceived differently by new or former customer groups. The tactic of offering prices to former customers higher than the new ones are perceived unfair by former customers as much as it is perceived unfair by the advantaged price group; new customers. Money refunds on the other hand are found to have no significant effect on the fairness perception of customers

Özet

Çalışmada, eski ya da yeni müşterilere daha yüksek fiyat sunmak şeklinde uygulanan bir müşteri kimliği bazlı fiyat farklılaştırmasının, müşterilerin avantajlı ya da dezavantajlı fiyat alması ve işletmenin para iadesi politikası göz önüne alınarak tüketicilerin adalet algıları üzerindeki etkileri incelenmiştir. 2x2x3 gruplararası faktöryel tasarım kullanılmış ve bağımsız değişkenleri manipüle edebilmek için senaryolar tasarlanmıştır. Tasarlanan 12 farklı senaryo farklı cevaplayıcı grupları tarafından okunmuş ve ardından bu grupların adalet algıları ölçülmüş ve gruplar arası farklılıklar analiz edilmiştir. İşletmelerin yeni ya da eski müşterilere daha yüksek fiyat sunma uygulamalarının adaletini eski ve yeni müşteri grupları farklı algılamaktadır. Eski müşterilere yeni müşterilerden daha yüksek fiyat sunulması uygulaması eski müşteriler tarafından adaletsiz algılandığı kadar avantajlı tarafta olan yeni müşteriler tarafından da adaletsiz algılanmaktadır. Para iadesi sunmak şeklinde yapılan telafinin ise müşteri adalet algıları üzerinde istatiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisi bulunmamaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

SIĞIRCI, Ö., GEGEZ, A. E. (2019). DOES PRICE ADVANTAGE ALWAYS PERCEIVED AS FAIR? EFFECTS OF CUSTOMER IDENTIFICATION BASED DIFFERENTIATED PRICING, CUSTOMER GROUP AND MONEY REFUND. Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 23, 21–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/285751

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ackerman, D. ve Perner, L. (2004). Did You Hear What My Friend Paid Examining the Consequences of Social Comparisons of Prices. Advances in Consumer Research, 31: 586-592.
  2. Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology içinde. New York: Academic Press, 267- 299. Antón, C., Camarero, C. ve Carrero, M. (2007). The Mediating Effect of Satisfaction on Consumers’ Switching Intention”. Psychology & Marketing, 24 (6): 511–38.
  3. Armstrong, G. ve Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing: An Introduction (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Baker, W., Marn, M. ve Zawada, C. (2001). Price Smarter on the Net’. Harvard Business Review, 79(2): 122-127.
  4. Barone M. J, Roy T. (2010). Does Exclusivity Always Pay Off? Exclusive Price Promotions and Consumer Response. Journal of Marketing, 74 (2): 121– 132. Batur, A. (2012). Fitnes Sektörü 70 Milyar Dolara Ulaştı, Türkiye’nin Payı yüzde 0.5’te Kaldı. Hürriyet Ekonomi, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ ekonomi/20777189.asp (1 Kasım 2017).
  5. Beldona, S. ve Namasivayan, K. (2006). Gender and Demand-Based Pricing: Differences in Perceived (Un)Fairness and Repatronage Intentions. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 14 (4): 89-107.
  6. Bertini, M. ve Gourville, J. T. (2012). Pricing to Create Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 90 (60): 97-104.
  7. Bitner, M.J., Booms, B.H. ve Tetreault, M.S. (1990). The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents. Journal of Marketing, 54 (1): 71-84.
  8. Blodgett, J.G., Hill, D.J. ve Tax, S.S. (1997).
  9. The Effects of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Postcomplaint Behavior. Journal of Retailing, 73 (2): 185–210.
  10. Bolton, L.E., Warlop, L. ve Alba, J.W., (2003). Consumer Perception of Price (Un)Fairness. Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (4): 474–491.
  11. Campbell, M. (2007). Says Who? How the Source of Price Information and Affect Influence Perceived Price (Un)Fairness. Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (2): 261-271.
  12. Campbell, M. C. (1999). Perceptions of Price Unfairness: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (2): 187–199.
  13. Carroll, K. ve Coates, D. (1999). Teaching Price Discrimination: Some Clarification. Southern Economic Journal, 66 (2): 466-480.
  14. Chen, Shih-Fen S., Monroe, K. M. ve Lou, Y-C. (1998). The Effects of Framing Price Promotion Messages on Consumers’ Perceptions and Purchase Intentions. Journal of Retailing, 74 (3): 353-372.
  15. Cox, J.L. (2001). Can differential