Journals / Marmara Medical Journal / 2009 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Diz artroskopisi cerrahisinde prilokain ile yapılan spinal ve epidural anestezinin derlenme özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması

The comparison of the recovery characteristics of either spinal or epidural anesthesia with prilocaine for knee arthroscopy

Pages
225–232
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Relatively fast recovery time make epidural anesthesia with prilocaine a good alternative for outpatient knee arthroscopy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of our study was to compare the recovery characteristics of single-dose spinal and epidural anesthesia with 2 % prilocaine for outpatient knee arthroscopy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After 48 hours, the patients were questioned for pain and need for analgesia, their opinion about the quality of anesthesia, side effects such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, backache, post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), urinary difficulties and transient neurological symptoms (TNS).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Relatively fast recovery time make epidural anesthesia with prilocaine a good alternative for outpatient knee arthroscopy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our study was to compare the recovery characteristics of single-dose spinal and epidural anesthesia with 2 % prilocaine for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Methods: Forty patients were randomly assigned to receive either spinal or epidural with prilocaine. Maximum sensory level, recovery of the motor and sensorial functions, time to ambulate, time to voiding, side effects, and medications used for treatment were recorded. After 48 hours, the patients were questioned for pain and need for analgesia, their opinion about the quality of anesthesia, side effects such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, backache, post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), urinary difficulties and transient neurological symptoms (TNS). Results: Maximum sensory level was similar in the groups. The time from injection to recovery of motor and sensory functions and ambulation time were significantly shorter in the epidural group than the spinal group (p < 0.05). The percentage of patients who required additional analgesic was 9% versus 6% in spinal versus epidural groups. One of the patients in the spinal group had PDPH postoperatively. None of the patients had postoperative nausea, vomiting, pruritus, backache, urinary difficulties or TNS. Conclusion: Relatively fast recovery time make epidural anesthesia with prilocaine a good alternative for outpatient knee arthroscopy.

Özet

Amaç: Bu calışma spinal ve epidural anestezide kullanılan tek doz prilokainin hastanın derlenme özellikleri üzerine etkisinin karşılaştırılması amacıyla planlanmıştır. Method: Diz artroskopisi geçirecek 40 hasta, 2 mL %2 prilokain ile spinal ya da 15-20 mL %2 prilokain ile epidural anestezi yapılacak şekilde randomize olarak 2 gruba ayrıldı. Hastaların maksimum duyu bloğu seviyeleri, motor ve duyu bloğunun geri dönüş süreleri, ayağa kalkma zamanları, ilk idrar yapma zamanları, yan etkiler ve tedavisinde kullanılan ilaçlar kaydedildiler. Hastalar taburcu olduktan 48 saat sonra, telefonla aranarak, operasyon sonrası ağrıları, analjezik ihtiyaçları, anestezi yönteminden memnuniyetleri, bulantı, kusma, kaşıntı, belağrısı, dura delinmesine bağlı baş ağrısı, idrar yaparken zorlanma ve geçici nörolojik semptomlar açısından sorgulandılar. Bulgular: Maksimum duyu bloğu seviyesi her iki grupta benzerdi. İlacın verilişinden duyu ve motor bloğun sonlanmasına dek geçen süre ve ayağa kalkma süresi epidural anestezi sonrası belirgin kısa bulundu (p < 0.05). Ek analjezik kullanan hasta sayısı, spinal anestezi sonrası %9 iken, epidural anestezi sonrası %6 idi. Spinal gruptan bir hastada dura delinmesine bağlı başağrısı görüldü. Hastaların hiçbirinde postoperatif bulantı, kusma, kaşıntı, bel ağrısı, idrar zorluğu ya da gecici norolojik semptomlar görülmedi. Hasta memnuniyeti açısından gruplar arasında fark bulunmadı. Sonuç: Hızlı derlenme süresi nedeniyle prilokain ile epidural anestezi diz artroskopilerinde iyi bir alternatiftir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRE, H., AY, B., ETİ, Z., GÖĞÜŞ, F. Y. (2009). Diz artroskopisi cerrahisinde prilokain ile yapılan spinal ve epidural anestezinin derlenme özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 225–232. https://ajindex.com/articles/284326

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Jenkins K, Grady D, Wong J, Correa R, Armanious S, Chung F. Post-operative recovery: day surgery patients-preferences. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 272-274
  2. Ben David B, Levin H, Solomon E, Admoni H, Vaida S. Spinal bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: The effect of saline dilution. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 716-720
  3. Patel NJ, Flashburg MH, Paskin S, Grossman R. Regional anesthetic technique compared to general anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 1986; 65: 185-187
  4. Pavlin DJ, Rapp SE, Polissar NL, Malmgren JA, Koerschgen M, Keyes H. Factors affecting discharge time in adult outpatients. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 816-826
  5. Pollock Je, Mulroy MF, Bent E, Polissar NL. A comparison of two regional anesthetic techniques for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 397-401
  6. Casati A, Cappelleri G, Fanelli G, Borghi B, Anelati D, Berti M, et al. Regional anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a randomized clinical comparison of two different anaesthetic techniques. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 543-547
  7. Heidvall M, Hein A, Davidson S, Jakobsson J. Cost comparison between three different general anaesthetic techniques for elective arthroscopy of knee. Acta Anaesthesiol Scan 2000; 44: 157-162
  8. Jacobson E, Forssblad M, Rosenberg J, Westman L, Weidenhielm L. Can local anesthesia be recommended for routine use in elective knee arthroscopy? A comparison between local, spinal, and general anesthesia. Arthroscopy 2000; 16: 183-190
  9. Forssblad M, Weidenhielm L. Knee arthroscopy in local versus general anaesthesia: the incidence of re-artroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1999; 7: 323-326
  10. Dahl V, Gierloff C, Omland E, Raeder JC. Spinal, epidural or propofol anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997; 41: 1341-1345
  11. Trieshmann H. Knee arthroscopy: a cost analysis of general and local anesthesia. Arthroscopy 1996; 12: 60-63
  12. Mulroy MF. Local and regional anesthesia. In: White PF, ed. Ambulatory Anesthesia& Surgery. London: W.B. Saunders Company Ltd, 1993:406-433
  13. Parnass SM, McCarthy RJ, Bach BR, et al. Beneficial impact of epidural anesthesia on recovery after outpatient arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 1993; 9: 91-95
  14. Fisher A, Bryce-Smith R. Spinal analgesic agents. A comparison of cinchocaine, lignocaine and prilocaine. Anaesthesia 1971; 26: 324-329
  15. Kuusniemi KS, Pihlajamäki KK, Irjala JK, Jaakkola PW, Pitkänen MT, Korkeila JE. Restricted spinal anaesthesia for