Journals / Marmara Medical Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

An elective program in medical education: Communication with Hard of Hearing People and Turkish Sign Language

Tıp eğitiminde bir seçmeli program: İşitme Engelli Bireylerle İletişim ve Türk İşaret Dili

Pages
14–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Inthe data analysis, descriptive qualitative and quantitative analysiswas used.Results: The mean overall score given to the program bythe students was 8.53±0.88 out of 10.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to present the outcome of theCommunication with Hard of Hearing People and Turkish SignLanguage elective program which is implemented for medicalstudents.Materials and Methods: Feedback from the students wascollected using a questionnaire of 21 statements under 10 headings.Student success was evaluated by theoretical and skill examinationresults and program success was evaluated by portfolio essays.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Inthe data analysis, descriptive qualitative and quantitative analysiswas used.Results: The mean overall score given to the program bythe students was 8.53±0.88 out of 10.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Themost significant output of the program was learning Turkish SignLanguage.Conclusion: The findings of this study show that the effect ofthe program on learning was highly positive and student feedbackwas encouraging for continuity of the program.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Eğitim programı geliştirme · Tıp eğitimi · İletişim

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to present the outcome of theCommunication with Hard of Hearing People and Turkish SignLanguage elective program which is implemented for medicalstudents.Materials and Methods: Feedback from the students wascollected using a questionnaire of 21 statements under 10 headings.Student success was evaluated by theoretical and skill examinationresults and program success was evaluated by portfolio essays. Inthe data analysis, descriptive qualitative and quantitative analysiswas used.Results: The mean overall score given to the program bythe students was 8.53±0.88 out of 10. The students expressedthe contribution levels of the block to the competence areasof professionalism as 8.45±1.64, to medical knowledge andunderstanding as 7.72±1.66, to clinical skills as 7.92±1.99 and tohigh-level skills as 8.09±1.52. The average of the block assessmentscores of the students was 88.39±0.76 at the end of the block. Themost significant output of the program was learning Turkish SignLanguage.Conclusion: The findings of this study show that the effect ofthe program on learning was highly positive and student feedbackwas encouraging for continuity of the program.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, tıp öğrencileri için uygulanan İşitme Engelli Bireylerle İletişim ve Türk İşaret Dili seçmeli program çıktılarını paylaşmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Öğrenci geribildirimleri 10 başlık altında 21 önermeden oluşan bir anket kullanılarak toplandı. Öğrenci başarısı, teorik ve beceri sınav sonuçlarıyla, program başarısı ise portfolyo yazılarıyla değerlendirildi. Veri analizinde niceliksel ve niteliksel betimleyici analiz kullanıldı. Bulgular: Öğrencilerin programa genel olarak verdikleri puanların ortalaması 10 üzerinden 8,53±0,88’dir. Öğrenciler bloğun yetkinlik alanı olarak profesyonelliğe katkısını 8,45±1,64, tıbbi bilgi ve anlayışa katkısını 7,72±1,66, klinik becerilere katkısını 7,92±1,99 ile üst düzey becerilere katkısını 8,09±1,52 olarak ifade ettiler. Öğrencilerin blok sonunda sınav sonuç ortalamaları 88,39±0,76’dır. Programın en önemli çıktısı Türk İşaret Dili’ni öğrenmek oldu. Sonuç: Bulgularımız, programın öğrenme üzerine olumlu etkisi olduğunu göstermekte ve öğrenci geri bildirimleri programın sürekliliğini gerekli kılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MIDIK, Ö., BAŞAR, F., EMİRZEOĞLU, M., ALAYLI, G., SARISOY, G., GÜNBEY, E., YÜCE, M., AĞAR, E. (2016). An elective program in medical education: Communication with Hard of Hearing People and Turkish Sign Language. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 14–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/283857

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. World Health Organisation. Action Plan “Better health for persons with disabilities” Frequently Asked Questions. 2015 http://www.who.int/disabilities/policies/actionplan/faq. pdf?ua=1 (Accessed 20 April 2015)
  2. World Health Organisation. World Report on Disability. 2011. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789240685215_ eng.pdf. (Accessed 20 April 2015)
  3. World Health Organisation. Promoting ear and hearing care through CBR Community-Based Rehabilitation. 2012. http://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/news/CBREarHearingCare. pdf. (Accessed 20 April 2015)
  4. Guidelines for Reporting and Writing about People with Disabilities. 2008. http://www.rtcil.org/products/RTCIL%20publications/Media/ Guidelines%20for%20Reporting%20and%20Writing%20 about%20People%20with%20Disabilities.pdf. (Accessed 20 April 2015
  5. WHO. Deafness and hearing loss. 2015. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs300/en/. (Accessed 22 April 2015
  6. WHO global estimates on prevalence of hearing loss. 2012 http://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/WHO_GE_HL.pdf (Accessed 24 April 2015
  7. Türkiye Özürlüler Araştırması-2002, ileri analiz raporu. Ankara: Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü, 2005
  8. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Engelli İstatistikleri. 2010. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1017. (Accessed 2015 April, 24)
  9. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Özürlülerin Sorun ve beklentileri araştırması. 2011. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=6370. (Accessed 2015 April, 26)
  10. Kemaloğlu YK. Ülkemizde İşitme Engellilerin Nüfusu Ne Kadardır? http://engelsiz.karatekin.edu.tr/e_isit/dosya/EK-01. pdf. (Accessed 2015 April, 26)
  11. Barnett S. Communication with deaf and hard of hearing people: A guide for medical education. Acad Med 2002; 77:694-700. doi: 00001888-200207000-00009 12. Steinberg A, Barnett S, Meador, HE, Wiggins, EA, Philip Z. Health Care System accessibility. Experiences and perceptions of deaf people. JGIM 2006; 21: 260-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525- 1497.2006.00340.x 13. Lezzioni LI, O’day BL, Killeen M, Harker H. Communicating about health care: observations from persons who are deaf or hard of hearing. Ann Intern Med 2004;140: 356-63. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-140-5-200403020-00011
  12. Chaveiro N, Barbosa MA, Porto CC. Literature revision about the attendance of deaf patient by health professionals. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2008; 42: 578-83. doi: 10.1590/S0080- 62342008000300023
  13. Hoang L, LaHousse SF, Nakaji MC, Sadler GR. Assessing deaf cultural competency of physici