SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marmara Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Comparing the effects of general and spinal anesthesia on the postoperative pain intensity in patients undergoing emergent or elective cesarean section

Reyhan ARSLANTAŞ
Tumay UMUROĞLU
Pages
62–67
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cesarean section · Emergent cesarean sections · Elective cesarean sections

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLANTAŞ, R., UMUROĞLU, T. (2019). Comparing the effects of general and spinal anesthesia on the postoperative pain intensity in patients undergoing emergent or elective cesarean section. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 62–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/283796

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology 2016 Feb
  2. doi:10.1097/ALN.000.000.0000000935 2. Cyna AM, Dodd J. Clinical update: obstetric anaesthesia. Lancet 2007
  3. S0140-6736(07)61320-8 3. Ismail S, Shahzad K, Shafiq F. Observational study to assess the effectiveness of postoperative pain management of patients undergoing elective cesarean section. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2012
  4. doi: 10.4103/0970- 9185.92432. 4. Hobson JA, Slade P, Wrench IJ, Power L. Preoperative anxiety and postoperative satisfaction in women undergoing elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2006
  5. Gorkem U, Togrul C, Sahiner Y, Yazla E, Gungor T. Preoperative anxiety may increase postcesarean delivery pain and analgesic consumption. Minerva Anestesiol 2016
  6. Kessous R, Weintraub AY, Wiznitzer A, et al. Spinal versus general anesthesia in cesarean sections: the effects on postoperative pain perception. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012
  7. doi: 10.1007/s00404.012.2265-y. 7. Powell R, Scott NW, Manyande A, et al. Psychological preparation and postoperative outcomes for adults undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016 26:CD008646. doi: 10.1002/14651858 8. Sutton CD, Carvalho B. Optimal pain management after cesarean delivery. Anesthesiol Clin 2017
  8. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2016.09.010. 9. Riker RR, Picard JT, Fraser GL. Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 1999
  9. Kessous R, Wiznitzer A, Polachek H, et al. Preoperative analgesia with local lidocaine infiltration for post cesarean delivery pain management. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012
  10. doi:10.3109/14767.058.2011.624222. 11. Wang JJ, Ho ST, Liu HS, Tzeng JI, Tze TS, Liaw WJ. The preemptive effect of regional anesthesia on post-cesarean section pain. Acta Anaesthesiologica Sinica 1995
  11. Fassoulaki A, Staikou C, Melemeni A, Kottis G, Petropoulos G. Anaesthesia preference, neuraxial vs general, and outcome after caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010
  12. doi: 10.3109/01443.615.2010.518650 13. Acikel A, Ozturk T, Goker A, Hayran GG, Keles GT. Comparison of patient satisfaction between general and spinal anaesthesia in emergency caesarean de