Journals / Marmara Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

Diagnostic accuracy of noncompacted-to-compacted wall ratio criteria on CMRI for the diagnosis of left ventricular noncompaction

Pages
124–129
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We suggest using higher NC/C cut-off value in individualswithout high clinical suspicion of LVNC.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the current criterion, noncompacted-to-compacted (NC/C) wall ratio > 2.3 oncardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) for the diagnosis of left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC).Materials and Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 37 patients as an LVNC group and a total of 97 participants with ischemic,hypertrophic, and dilated cardiomyopathy and healthy controls as a control group.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The NC/C ratio was measured perpendicularlyon short-axis cine images for segments 1-16 and four-chamber cine images for the apex during the end-diastole.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We suggest using higher NC/C cut-off value in individualswithout high clinical suspicion of LVNC.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Accuracy · Cardiomyopathy · CMR

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the current criterion, noncompacted-to-compacted (NC/C) wall ratio > 2.3 oncardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) for the diagnosis of left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC).Materials and Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 37 patients as an LVNC group and a total of 97 participants with ischemic,hypertrophic, and dilated cardiomyopathy and healthy controls as a control group. The NC/C ratio was measured perpendicularlyon short-axis cine images for segments 1-16 and four-chamber cine images for the apex during the end-diastole. The sensitivity,specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of NC/C ratio > 2.3 for the diagnosis of LVNC were calculated.Results: LVNC patients comprised 24 males (64.8%) and 13 females (35.2%) with the mean age of 29.24 ± 11.79 years. The NC/C ratio> 2.3 detected in all but one of the LVNC patients (97.3%). On the other hand, the specificity of NC/C ratio > 2.3 was 79.4% for thediagnosis of the LVNC patients. Using NC/C ratio > 2.66 and > 2.8 yielded 91.9% sensitivity and 97% specificity, and 81% sensitivityand 100% specificity, respectively.Conclusion: NC/C ratio > 2.3 might lead to overdiagnosis of LVNC. We suggest using higher NC/C cut-off value in individualswithout high clinical suspicion of LVNC.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALIŞ, D., ASMAKUTLU, O., ŞAHİN, H. A., GÜLER, A. (2019). Diagnostic accuracy of noncompacted-to-compacted wall ratio criteria on CMRI for the diagnosis of left ventricular noncompaction. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 124–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/283790

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ritter M, Oechslin E, Sutsch G, Attenhofer C, Schneider J, Jenni R. Isolated noncompaction of the myocardium in adults. Mayo Clin Proc 1997
  2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.017 [2] Oechslin EN, Attenhofer Jost CH, Rojas JR, Kaufmann PA, Jenni R. Long-term follow-up of 34 adults with isolated left ventricular noncompaction: a distinct cardiomyopathy with poor prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000
  3. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00755-5 [3] Oechslin E, Jenni R. Left ventricular non-compaction revisited: a distinct phenotype with genetic heterogeneity? Eur Heart J 2011
  4. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq508 [4] Elliott P, Andersson B, Arbustini E, et al. Classification of the cardiomyopathies: a position statement from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J 2008
  5. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm342 [5] Maron BJ, Towbin JA, Thiene G, et al. Contemporary definitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee
  6. Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Groups
  7. and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation 2006
  8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.174287 [6] Ichida F, Tsubata S, Bowles KR, et al. Novel gene mutations in patients with LV noncompaction or Barth syndrome. Circulation 2001
  9. 1256–63. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.9.1256 [7] Klaassen S, Probst S, Oechslin E, et al. Mutations in sarco- mere protein genes in LV noncompaction. Circulation 2008
  10. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.109.903898 [8] Sasse-Klaassen S, Gerull B, Oechslin E, Jenni R, Thierfelder L. Isolated noncompaction of the LV myocardium in the adult is an autosomal dominant disorder in the majority of patients. Am J Med Genet A 2003
  11. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20075 [9] Jenni R, Oechslin E, Schneider J, Attenhofer Jost CH, Kaufmann PA. Echocardiographic and pathoanatomical characteristics of isolated LV non-compaction: a step towards classification as a distinct cardiomyopathy. Heart 2001
  12. doi: 10.1136/heart.86.6.666 [10] Oechslin EN, Jost CHA, Rojas JR, Kaufmann PA, Jenni R, Long-term follow-up of 34 adults with isolated left ventricular noncompaction: a distinct cardiomyopathy with poor prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000
  13. 493–500. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(0