SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Kollektivist Kültür Değerinin Sosyal Sorumlu Tüketim Üzerine Etkisini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma / A Study to Determine the Effect of the Value of Collectivist Culture on Socially Responsible Consumption

Alpaslan YÜCE
Pages
0
Publication Date
2014-01-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been confirmed that perceptions of students on the dimensions of Socially Responsible Consumption do not differ from their taking course of public service applications or not.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Rapid advances in technology, the perspective which aims to increase the consumption by forgetting that natural resources of mankind are limited and accordingly rise in production have confronted not only environmental and resource problems which threaten earth life but also social problems in the world today.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All these developments have raised the concept of socially responsible consumption that means conscious consumption.In this study, effects of the courses in community service applications for the students on social responsibility, performance of the students who have “dimensions of socially responsible consumption”, the traditional purchasing behaviour, the recycling behaviour and the environment-conscious have been discussed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been confirmed that perceptions of students on the dimensions of Socially Responsible Consumption do not differ from their taking course of public service applications or not.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal Sorumlu Tüketim Anlayışı · Topluma Hizmet Uygulamaları Dersi · Kollektivizm

Abstract

Rapid advances in technology, the perspective which aims to increase the consumption by forgetting that natural resources of mankind are limited and accordingly rise in production have confronted not only environmental and resource problems which threaten earth life but also social problems in the world today. This situation has led to assessments of people’s habits of consumption, lifestyles and primarily environment and social sensitivities. All these developments have raised the concept of socially responsible consumption that means conscious consumption.In this study, effects of the courses in community service applications for the students on social responsibility, performance of the students who have “dimensions of socially responsible consumption”, the traditional purchasing behaviour, the recycling behaviour and the environment-conscious have been discussed. In addition, relationship between the students with values of collectivist cultural and the dimensions of socially responsible consumption has been examined. In this direction, a survey has been conducted over the students who have been receiving an education in Kafkas University. As a result of the conducted research, it has been ascertained that there has been a connection with the perception of other dimensions oriented apart from values of students’ collectivist culture and the traditional purchasing behaviour which is one of the perceptions of socially responsible consumption. It has been confirmed that perceptions of students on the dimensions of Socially Responsible Consumption do not differ from their taking course of public service applications or not.

Özet

Öz: Teknolojideki hızlı gelişmeler, insanoğlunun doğal kaynakların kısıtlı olduğunu unutarak tüketimi

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCE, A. (2014). Kollektivist Kültür Değerinin Sosyal Sorumlu Tüketim Üzerine Etkisini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma / A Study to Determine the Effect of the Value of Collectivist Culture on Socially Responsible Consumption. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 0. https://ajindex.com/articles/28373

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alnıaçık, U., Alnıaçık, E., Genç, N. (2011). “How Corporate Social Responsibility Information Influences Stakeholders’ Intentions”. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental ManagementCorp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Mgmt,18, ss.234–245.
  2. Balıkçıoğlu, B. (2008). “Tüketici Etnosantrizminin Satinalma Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Ankara Örneği” (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı. Bayraktar, M. (2001). “Sürdürülebilir Bir Toplum İçin Sorumlu Tüketim Modeli”. Standart Ekonomik ve Teknik Dergisi, Mayıs, No:481, ss.51-53.
  3. Çiftci, S., Koçak, A. (2008). “Sosyal Sorumlu Tüketim Anlayışının Boyutları ve Ölçümüne İlişkin Ankara Üniversitesi Öğrencilerine Yönelik Bir Uygulama”. Ulusal Pazarlama Kongresi, 25-29
  4. Ekim, Nevşehir. Dinçer, B. (2011). “Do the Shareholders Really Care about Corporate Social Responsibility?”. International Journal of Business and Social Science,Vol:2, No:10, June. Erdem T., Swait, J.- Valenzuela, A. (2006). “Brands as Signals: A Cross-CountryValidation Study Brands”. Journal of Marketing, Vol:70, January, ss.34–49.
  5. Ertürk, S. (1997). Eğitimde Program Geliştirme. Ankara:
  6. Meteksan A.Ş. Fraj, E., Martinez, E. (2006). Environmental values and lifestyles as determining factors of ecological consumer behaviour.An emprical analysis, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23 (3), 113-144.
  7. Hayta, A.B. (2009). “Sürdürülebilir Tüketim Davranışının Kazanılmasında Tüketici Eğitiminin Rolü”. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt:10, Sayı:3, Aralık, ss.143-151.
  8. Hofstede, G. (1994). “Management Scientists Are Human”. Management Science, Vol:49, No:1, January. Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures Consequences: Comparing Values, Behavior, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (2 nd Eddition). Thousand Oaks; CA: Sage Publications. Rice, G. (2006). “Pro-environmental Behavior in Egypt: Is there a Role for Islamic Environmental Ethics?”. Journal of Business Ethics, June, Volume: 65, Issue: 4, pp 373-390.
  9. Karalar, R., Erdoğan, Z., Kiracı, H. (2008). “Çevreye İlişkin Bilgi Düzeyi ve Sürdürülebilir Tüketim Davranışı İlişkisi: Üniversite Öğencileri Üzerine Bir Uygulama”. 13. Ulusal Pazarlama Kongresi, Adana: ss. 340-358.
  10. Kim, Y., Choi, S. M. (2005). “Antecedents of Green Purchase Behavior: An Examination Of Collectivism, Environmental Concern, and PCE”, Advances in Consumer Research, Volume: 32, 592-599.
  11. Kocabaş, İ., Erdem, R. (2006). “Kurum yöneticilerinin kültürel eğilimlerinin yata