Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Preeklamptik Hastalarda Eritrosit İndeksleri

Erythrocyte Indices in Patients with Preeclampsia

Pages
35–42
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides, in ROC analysis of preeclampsia patients with different severities, RDW and RBC showed the ideal predictive values (p=0.006, p=0.031, respectively).Conclusion: Our study results revealed that among the red blood cell indices, only increased RDW values were associated with both the presence and the severity of preeclampsia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of study was to investigate erythrocyte indices in patients with preeclampsia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The study population consisted of 102 patients with preeclampsia (49 mild, 53 severe preeclampsia) and 98 control pregnant patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides, in ROC analysis of preeclampsia patients with different severities, RDW and RBC showed the ideal predictive values (p=0.006, p=0.031, respectively).Conclusion: Our study results revealed that among the red blood cell indices, only increased RDW values were associated with both the presence and the severity of preeclampsia.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of study was to investigate erythrocyte indices in patients with preeclampsia. Materials and Methods: The study population consisted of 102 patients with preeclampsia (49 mild, 53 severe preeclampsia) and 98 control pregnant patients. For the entire study population, red blood cell indices, including baseline mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), red cell distribution width (RDW), and red blood cell (RBC) were measured by using an automatic blood counter.Results: In the preeclampsia group, the median RDW was 15% (13.8-16.57), whereas in the control group it was 13.9% (13-15.6) (p<0.01). On the other hand, the mean MCV value was 80.42±7.86 (fL) in preeclampsia group and 83.88±2.31 (fL) in control group (p=0.003). Besides, the mean MCHC value was 33.66±1.71 (g/dL) in preeclampsia group and 33.09±1.48 (g/dL) in control group (p=0.012). However MCH and RBC values were not statistically different between the groups. (p>0.05) Moreover, subgroup analysis revealed that RDW levels were significantly increased in preeclampsia subjects than in mild preeclampsia patients (15.4% (13.9-17.45) vs 14.3% (13.7-15.7), p=0.031), MCV levels were decreased (78.81±7.91 (fL) vs 82.16± 7.43 (fL), p=0.03), RBC values were increased (4.16 (3.79-4.85)x(1012/L) vs 3.82 (3.454.34)x(1012/L), (p=0.006)) in patients with severe preeclampsia when compared to the patients with mild preeclampsia. In the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis of subjects with and without preeclampsia, RDW and MCV showed high predictive values (p<0.01). Besides, in ROC analysis of preeclampsia patients with different severities, RDW and RBC showed the ideal predictive values (p=0.006, p=0.031, respectively).Conclusion: Our study results revealed that among the red blood cell indices, only increased RDW values were associated with both the presence and the severity of preeclampsia.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı preeklampsi tanısı konmuş hastalarda eritrosit indekslerini araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya 102 preeklampsi (49 hafif ve 53 şiddetli preeklampsi olmak üzere) ve 98 kontrol hastası dahil edilmiştir. Tüm çalışma grubunda eritrosit indeksleri olan ortalama korpuskular hacim (MCV), ortalama korpuskular hemoglobin (MCH), ortalama korpuskular hemoglobin konsantrasyonu (MCHC), eritrosit sayımı ve eritrosit dağılım genişliği değerleri otomatik kan sayım cihazı ile ölçüldü Bulgular: Preeklampsi grubunda, medyan RDW %15 (13,8-16,57), ortalama MCV değeri 80,42±7,86 (fL), ortalama MCHC değeri 33,66±1,71 (g/dL) ve kontrol grubunda medyan RDW %13,9 (13-15,6), ortalama MCV değeri 83,88±2,31 (fL), ortalama MCHC değeri 33,09±1,48 (g/dL) idi (sırasıyla p 0,05). Preeklampsi grubunda subgroup analizi yapıldığında, hafif preeklampsi grubuna göre, ciddi preeklampsi grubunda artmış RDW değerleri (% 15,4 (13,9-17,45) vs %14,3 (13,7-15,7), p=0,031), azalmış MCV değerleri (78,81±7,91 (fL) vs 82,16±7,43 (fL), p=0,03), artmış RBC değerleri (4,16 (3,79-4,85)x(1012/L) vs 3,82 (3,45-4,34)x(1012/L), (p=0,006) saptandı. Preeklampsi ve kontrol grubu hastalarının Receiver operatör karakteristik (ROK) analizi sonuçlarına göre eritrosit sayımı ve eritrosit dağılım genişliğinin hastalığı tespit etmede yüksek prediktif değerleri saptandı (p<0,01). Ayrıca ROK analiz sonuçlarına göre, hafif ve ciddi preeklampsili hastalarda RDW ve RBC değerleri hastalığın ciddiyetini belirlemede ideal prediktif değerlere sahip idi (p=0,006, p=0,031). Sonuç: Eritrosit indeksleri arasında artmış RDW değerleri hem preeklampsi tanısı, hem de hastalığın ciddiyeti ile ilişkilidir

🔖

Cite This Article

AVCIOĞLU, S. N., SEZER, S. D., ALTINKAYA, S. Ö., KÜÇÜK, M., ÖMÜRLÜ, İ. K., YÜKSEL, H. (2015). Preeklamptik Hastalarda Eritrosit İndeksleri. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 35–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/282876

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Roberts CL, Algert CS, Morris JM, Ford JB, Henderson-Smart DJ. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a population-based study. Med J Aust 2005; 182: 332-5.
  2. North RA, Taylor RS, Schellenberg JC. Evaluation of a definition of pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 767-73.
  3. Roberts JM, Taylor RN, Musci TJ, Rodgers GM, Hubel CA, McLaughlin MK. Preeclampsia: an endothelial cell disorder. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1200-4. Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol 2009; 33: 130-7.
  4. Gezer C, Ekin A, Özeren M, Taner CE, Avcı ME, Doğan A. Erken ve geç preeklampside birinci trimester inflamasyon belirteçlerinin yeri. Perinatal Journal 2014; 22: 128-32.
  5. Pijnenborg R, Bland JM, Robertson WB, Brosens I. Uteroplacental arterial changes related to interstitial trophoblast migration in early human pregnancy. Placenta 1983; 4: 397-413.
  6. Saito S, Shiozaki A, Nakashima A, Sakai M, Sasaki Y. The role of the immune system in preeclampsia. Mol Aspects Med 2007; 28: 192-209.
  7. Bessman JD, Gilmer PR Jr, Gardner FH. Improved classification of anemias by MCV and RDW. Am J Clin Pathol 1983; 80: 322-6.
  8. Sultana GS, Haque SA, Sultana T, Rahman Q, Ahmed AN. Role of red cell distribution width (RDW) in the detection of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy within the first 20 weeks of gestation. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2011; 37: 102-5.
  9. Tanindi A, Topal FE, Topal F, Celik B. Red cell distribution width in patients with prehypertension and hypertension. Blood Press 2012; 21: 177-81.
  10. Montagnana M, Cervellin G, Meschi T, Lippi G. The role of red blood cell distribution width in cardiovascular and thrombotic disorders. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 50: 635-41.
  11. Liu DS, Jin Y, Ma SG, Bai F, Xu W. The ratio of red cell distribution width to mean corpuscular volume in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis. Clin Lab 2013; 59: 1099-104. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 77: 67-75.
  12. Abdullahi H, Osman A, Rayis DA, Gasim GI, Imam AM, Adam I. Red blood cell distribution width is not correlated with preeclampsia among pregnant Sudanese women. Diag Pathol 2014; 9: 29. Kurt RK, Aras Z, Silfeler DB, Kunt C, Islimye M, Kosar O. Relationship of red cell distribution width with the presence and severity of preeclampsia. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2015; 21: 128-31.
  13. Patel KV, Semba RD, Ferruc