Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Türk Otomotiv Endüstrisinde Maliyet ve Toplam Faktör Verimliliği

Pages
325–350
Publication Date
2015-03-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that factors of production used to be substitutes for each other and the industry positively affected from economies of scope for companies engaged in the production.Keyuords: Seemingly Unrelated Regression, Hedonic Cost Function, Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index, Turkish Automotive Industry, Data Envelopment Analysis, Productivity

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main objective of this study is to analyze the production cost and total factor productivity of Turkish Automotive Industry as an example of differentiated oligopoly market for the period of 1992-2011.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To achieve this goal, Data Envelopment Analysis and Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index methods applied separately for each period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that factors of production used to be substitutes for each other and the industry positively affected from economies of scope for companies engaged in the production.Keyuords: Seemingly Unrelated Regression, Hedonic Cost Function, Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index, Turkish Automotive Industry, Data Envelopment Analysis, Productivity
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Görünüşte İlişkisiz Regresyon · Hedonik Maliyet Fonksiyonu · Malmquist Toplam Faktör Verimlilik İndeksi

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to analyze the production cost and total factor productivity of Turkish Automotive Industry as an example of differentiated oligopoly market for the period of 1992-2011. To achieve this goal, Data Envelopment Analysis and Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index methods applied separately for each period. Moreover, by taking into account product characteristics produced by firms into Turkish Automotive Industry, it is to put forward a hedonic cost function for whole industry and is to estimate an elasticity of substitution, economies of scale and economies of scope. Consequently, the change in total factor productivity and its components were estimated for the firms into Turkish Automotive Industry. Additionally, the hedonic cost function was estimated for Turkish Automotive Industry firms among the same period. It was concluded that factors of production used to be substitutes for each other and the industry positively affected from economies of scope for companies engaged in the production.Keyuords: Seemingly Unrelated Regression, Hedonic Cost Function, Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index, Turkish Automotive Industry, Data Envelopment Analysis, Productivity

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, farklılaştırılmış oligopol piyasası örneği olan Türk otomotiv endüstrisi için 1992-2011 dönemi itibariyle üretim maliyetini ve toplam faktör verimliliğini detaylı olarak analiz etmektir. Bu amacı gerçekleştirmek üzere, Veri Zarflama Analizi ve Malmquist Toplam Faktör Verimliliği İndeksi yöntemleri her bir dönem için ayrı ayrı uygulanmıştır. Ayrıca, Türk otomotiv endüstrisinde faaliyet gösteren firmaların üretmiş oldukları ürün özellikleri dikkate alınarak endüstri genelinde hedonik maliyet fonksiyonu ortaya konulmuş, ikame esnekliği, ölçek ekonomileri ve kapsam ekonomileri tahmin edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, Türk otomotiv endüstrisinde faaliyet gösteren firmaların toplam faktör verimliliğindeki değişme ve bileşenleri yıllar itibariyle tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, endüstrideki firmaların kullandıkları üretim faktörlerinin birbirinin ikamesi olduğu ve endüstrinin kapsam ekonomilerinden olumlu etkilendiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAYLALI, M., YAYLALI, M., ÇALMAŞUR, G. (2015). Türk Otomotiv Endüstrisinde Maliyet ve Toplam Faktör Verimliliği. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 325–350. https://ajindex.com/articles/28241

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akkaya, Ş. ve Pazarlıoğlu, M. V. (1998). Ekonometri II. İstanbul:
  2. Erkam Matbaacılık. Arnade, C. (1994). “Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Measure International Agricultural Efficiency and Productivity”. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin, Number: 1831. Bakırcı, F. (2006). “Sektörel Bazda Bir Etkinlik Ölçümü: VZA ile Bir Analiz”. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 20 (2), 199–217. Banker, R. D. (1992). “Estimation of Returns to Scale Using Data Envelopment Analysis”. European Journal of Operational Research, 62 (1), 74-84.
  3. Baumol, W. J. (1977). “On the Proper Cost Tests for Natural Monopoly in a Multiproduct Industry”. The American Economic Review, 67 (5), 809-822.
  4. Berry, S., Kortum, S. ve Pakes, A. (1996). “Environmental Change and Hedonic Cost Functions for Automobiles”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Colloquium Paper, (93), 12731–12738. Büyükkılıç, D. ve Yavuz, İ. (2005). İmalat Sanayinde Toplam Faktör Verimliliği: Teknik Değişim, Teknik Etkinlik (1994-2001). MPM Yayınları No: 685. Ankara:
  5. MPM. Cameron, C. A. ve Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R. ve Tretheway, M. W. (1980). “Flexible Cost Functions for Multiproduct Firms”. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 62 (3), 477-481.
  7. Caves, R. E., Christensen, L. ve Diewert, W. E. (1982). “The Economic Theory Index Number and The Measurement of Output and Productivity”. Econometrica, 50 (6), 1393-1414.
  8. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. ve Rhodes E. (1978). “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units”. European Journal of Operational Research, II, 429-444.
  9. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. ve Rhodes, E. (1981). “Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envolopment Analysis to Program Follow Through”. Management Science, 27 (6), 668-697.
  10. Charnes, A., Cooper, W., Lewin, A. Y. ve Seiford, L. M. (1994). Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Application. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  11. Chen, Y. (2011). “Productivity of Automobile Industries Using the Malmquist Index: Evidence from the Last Economic Recession”. Journal of Centrum Cathedra, 4 (2), 165-181.
  12. Coelli, T. J. (1996). “A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program”. Center for Efficiency and Productive Analysis Working Paper, No: 8. Coelli, T. J. ve Rao, D. S. P. (2003). Total Factor Productivity Growth in Agricultur