SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mali Çözüm / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 155

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & TAX AVOIDANCE: AN INVESTIGATION ON BIST FIRMS

KURUMSAL YÖNETİM & VERGİDEN KAÇINMA İLİŞKİSİ: BİST İŞLETMELERİ ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

Duygu Şengül ÇELİKAY
Fatma Münevver YILANCI
Pages
13–32
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analyzes, similar to the current studies in the literatüre, it has been concluded that tax avoidance increased in the presence of effective corporate governance mechanisims.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to reveal the relationship between different corporate governance practices of businesses and tax avoidance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For his purpose; the relationship between corporate governance variables (the number of board members, the number of independent members of the board of directors, the number of female members in the board of directors, the independent audit opinion, the corporate ownership rate) and tax avoidance measured by adjusted book- tax gap method were analyzed using “the generalizedestimation equation method,” which is appropriate for the structure of the data of the companies quoted on the BIST ALL index during the period of 2010- 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analyzes, similar to the current studies in the literatüre, it has been concluded that tax avoidance increased in the presence of effective corporate governance mechanisims.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2010- 2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reveal the relationship between different corporate governance practices of businesses and tax avoidance. For his purpose; the relationship between corporate governance variables (the number of board members, the number of independent members of the board of directors, the number of female members in the board of directors, the independent audit opinion, the corporate ownership rate) and tax avoidance measured by adjusted book- tax gap method were analyzed using “the generalizedestimation equation method,” which is appropriate for the structure of the data of the companies quoted on the BIST ALL index during the period of 2010- 2015. As a result of the analyzes, similar to the current studies in the literatüre, it has been concluded that tax avoidance increased in the presence of effective corporate governance mechanisims.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı işletmelerin farklı kurumsal yönetim uygulamalarıyla vergiden kaçınma oranları arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda; 2010-2015 yılları arasında BİST TÜM endeksine kote olan işletmelerin kurumsal yönetim değişkenlerinin (kurumsal sahiplik oranı, yönetim kurulu üye sayısı, yönetim kurulu bağımsız üye sayısı, yönetim kurulundaki kadın üye sayısı, bağımsız denetim görüşü, denetim şirketi ve aile işletmesi olma), “düzeltilmiş ticari kâr – mali kâr farkı” yöntemiyle ölçülen vergiden kaçınmayla ilişkileri, verilerin yapısına uygun olan panel veri analizi yöntemlerinden “genelleştirilmiş tahmin eşitliği” yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Analizler sonucunda literatürdeki mevcut çalışmalarla benzer şekilde, genel olarak etkin kurumsal yönetimin varlığında vergiden kaçınmanın arttığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİKAY, D. Ş., YILANCI, F. M. (2019). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & TAX AVOIDANCE: AN INVESTIGATION ON BIST FIRMS. Mali Çözüm, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 155, 13–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/281573

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Amiram, D., Bauer, A. M. ve Frank, M. M. (2013). Corporate Tax Avoidance and Managerial Incentives Generated by Shareholder Dividend Tax Policy Erişim Adresi: http://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty-research/ sites/facultyresearch/files/accounting/AMIRAM.BURTON.2013.pdf Annuar, H. A., Salihu, I. A., Obid, S. N. S., (2014). “Corporate Ownership, Governance and Tax Avoidance: An Interactive Effects”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, ss. 150 – 160, International Conference on Accounting Studies 2014, ICAS 2014, 18-19 August 2014,
  2. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Armstrong, C.S., Blouin, J. L. and Larcker, D.F. (2012).
  3. The Incentives for Tax Planning, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53 (1-2), 391-411.
  4. Armstrong, C.S., Blouin, J.L., Jagolinzer, A.D. and Larcker, D.F. (2015).
  5. Corporate Governance, Incentives and Tax Avoidance, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60 (1), 1-17.
  6. Baltagi, B.H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data. 3. bs. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Baltagi, B.H. and Wu, P.X. (1999). Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR(1) disturbances. Econometric Theory, 15, 814-823.
  7. Bauer, A. (2011). Internal Control Quality as an Explanatory Factor of Tax Avoidance, (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) School of Accounting & Finance University of Waterloo Bauer, A. (2014). Tax Avoidance and the Implications of Weak Internal Controls, Contemporary Accounting Research, 33 (2), 449 – 486. Boussaidi, A. and Hamed, M. S. (2015). The Impact of Governance Mechanisms on Tax Aggressiveness: Empirical Evidence From Tunisian Context, Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 5, (1), 1-12.
  8. Brown, M. and Forsythe, A. (1974), Robust test for the equality of variances, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 364-367.
  9. Chen, K. P. and Chu, C. Y. C. (2005). Internal Control vs. External Manipulation: A Model of Corporate Income Tax Evasion, RAND Journal of Economics, 36, 151 – 164. Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q. And Shevlin, T. (2010). Are Family Firms More Tax Aggressive Than Non-Family Firms?, Journal of Financial”Economics, 95, 41-61.
  10. Desai, M. and Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate Tax Avoidance and Highpowered Incentives, Journal of Financial Economics, 79, (1), 145–179.
  11. Desai, M. ve Dharmapala, D. (2009). Corporate Tax Avoidance and Firm Value, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, (3), 537-546.
  12. Donohoe, M. P. ve Knechel, W. B. (2014). Does Corporate Tax Aggressiveness Influence Audit Pricing?, Contemperory Accounting Research, 31, (1), 2