SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mathematical and Computational Applications / 2011 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Technical efficiency and total factor productivity growth in the hazelnut agricultural sales cooperatives unions in Turkey

Mehmet CANDEMİR
Mümin ÖZCAN
Mustafa GÜNEŞ
ERTUĞRUL DELİKTAŞ
Pages
66–76
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has also been observed that there are average annual %1.3 improvements in technical efficiency, 3% regress in technical change, and %1.7 decreases in the total factor productivity of the HASCUs over the period 2004-2008.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study measures the production efficiencies and total factor productivity changes of Hazelnut Agricultural Sales Cooperatives Unions (HASCUs) in Turkey over the period 2004-2008.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Turkey produces %78.2 hazelnut production of world and gives service to 233,820 farmers in the Black Sea Region of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has also been observed that there are average annual %1.3 improvements in technical efficiency, 3% regress in technical change, and %1.7 decreases in the total factor productivity of the HASCUs over the period 2004-2008.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004-2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study measures the production efficiencies and total factor productivity changes of Hazelnut Agricultural Sales Cooperatives Unions (HASCUs) in Turkey over the period 2004-2008. Turkey produces %78.2 hazelnut production of world and gives service to 233,820 farmers in the Black Sea Region of Turkey. To measure production efficiencies of these units, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach and Malmquist Productivity Indexes are used. In the our efficiency analysis, the data of 50 HASCUs is considered but only the data of 37 cooperative units is found appropriate for the DEA. The findings of our study show that the average annual technical efficiency scores of HASCUs change between 0.841 and 0.938. It has also been observed that there are average annual %1.3 improvements in technical efficiency, 3% regress in technical change, and %1.7 decreases in the total factor productivity of the HASCUs over the period 2004-2008.

Özet

Türkçe Öz Yok

🔖

Cite This Article

CANDEMİR, M., ÖZCAN, M., GÜNEŞ, M., DELİKTAŞ, E. (2011). Technical efficiency and total factor productivity growth in the hazelnut agricultural sales cooperatives unions in Turkey. Mathematical and Computational Applications, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 66–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/280501

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. www.fiskobirlik.gov.tr 2.www.ieuhazelnut.org/hazelnut-production.aps 3.www.gursoy.com.tr/content/view/287/247/lang/en 4.T.J. Coelli and D.S.P Rao, Implicit Value Shares in Malmquist TFP Index Numbers, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, CEPA Working Papers, 4, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Australia Working Papers, 1-27,2003. 5.A.Ö. Önder, E.Deliktaş ve M.Karadağ, The comparison of DEA and SFA Methods in the efficiency of the Turkish Manufacturing Industry, DEÜ, İİBF Journey, 18-1,71-92. İzmir,2003. 6.C.A.K, Lowell, Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency in Fried, H.O., C.A.K., Lovell ve S.S. Schmidt (Eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Oxford University Press, 3-67, New York, 1993. 7.R. Fare, Grosskopf, S., M. Norriss, Z.Y.Zhang, Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries, The American Economic Review, March, Vol.84,66-80,1994. 8.A.I. Ali and L.M. Seiford, The Mathemetical Programming Approach to Efficiency Analysis in Fried H.O., C.A.K. Lovell and S.S. Schmidt (Eds), The Measurement of Productivity Efficiency, Oxford University Press,, 120-159, New York,1993. 9.A. Charnes, W. Cooper, A.Y. Lewin, L.M, Seiford, Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Metodology and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1995. 10.Seiford, L.M., (1996). "Data Envelopment Analysis, The Evolution of the State of the Art (1978-1995)", Journal of Productivity Analysis 7(2/3), 97-137. 11.T.J. Coelli, D.S.P. Rao, G.E. Battase, An Introduction to Efficiency ve Productivity Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1998. 12.O. Zaim ve F. Taşkın, The Comparative Performance of Public Enterprise Sector in Turkey: A Malmquist Productivity Index Approach, Journal of Comparative Economics 25, 129-157,1997. 13.M. Karadağ and E. Deliktaş, Growth of Factor Productivity in the Turkish Manufacturing Industry at Provincal Level, Regional Studies, Vol 39.2, pp.213-223, 2005. 14.E.H. Çakmak and O. Zaim, Türkiye'de Tarım Kesiminde Etkinlik, ODTÜ Gelişme Journey, 19(3), ss.305-316, Ankara, 1992. 15.A. Amade Carlos, Using Data Envelopment Analysis To Measure International Agricultural Efficiency and Productivity, United States Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin Number 1831, 1-26,1994. 16.K.Suhariyanto and C.Thirtle, Asian Agriculture Productivity and Convergence, Journal of Agricultural economics, Vol, 52(3), 96-110,2001. 17.G.B. Nkamleu, Productivity Growth, Technical